Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Walker Texas Rangerpor James Reasoner
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Pertenece a las series
Texas Ranger Walker matches wits with old enemies Carlos and Ramon Vega Garcia when a brutal drug-smuggling cartel decides to bring heroin into Dallas by disguising it in packages of legitimate medicine. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNinguno
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999ValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
Reasoner demonstrates a good grasp of action scenes, basic law enforcement tactics, and weapons handling. The fights and gun battles are meticulously blocked out and flow smoothly. However, this has been done at the expense of any real character development.
Even the established characters come across as largely one dimensional. Walker displays none of the caring and compassion or dedicated service to the community for which the character is famous. Instead, Reasoner writes for him as a hard core cop who doesn't care who gets hurt as long as he gets results.
His characterizations of the remaining core characters is much better; unfortunately, the reader doesn't see much of them to the point that one wonders why he bothered to write them into the story in the first place.
Reasoner also should have spent more time studying the series. Several crucial details are incorrect, including basically known facts such as Trivette's inability to drive a semi or ride a horse or the name of CD's restaurant.
The original characters are interesting and present potential for development, but Reasoner never quite manages to get there. The reader is left with tantalizing hints about these characters but nothing more. Almost all of them are cardboard cut-outs and stereotypes.
It's not a bad read but it's disappointing because it could have been much more if the writer had spent time with the characters. It's almost as though he tried for a writing style like Elmer Kelton's or Louis L'Amour's and didn't quite make it. ( )