PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do

por Erik J. Larson

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaConversaciones
841321,908 (3.91)Ninguno
Futurists are certain that humanlike AI is on the horizon, but in fact engineers have no idea how to program human reasoning. AI reasons from statistical correlations across data sets, while common sense is based heavily on conjecture. Erik Larson argues that hyping existing methods will only hold us back from developing truly humanlike AI.… (más)
Añadido recientemente porcoachdaddy, boydnguyen, LawyerGroup, nathanm, Zare
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

AI was always a field of interest for me. By knowing people longer in this field than me I was aware of the up-and-down of interest in AI since after WW2, starting from simpler application like self-guiding systems to expert-systems and ways of training neural networks for purposes of data classification. For me this was always rather mechanistic, without that mystery and magnificence of SF AI's. As time went by I started to think that AI will at the end be a cross-over of human tissue and technology, not unlike in W4oK.

So when all the hype started couple of years ago I was taken aback. For any question I asked I got no answer - be it verbal or in texts in magazines. Everything came to - it works on its own, it is just required to add sufficient data. OK, this sounds like expert system but what about AI, how does it reason? Same answer. And it was given to me in a way like I was most stupid man ever for not getting it. And I started feeling like that after every discussion with my colleagues - AI is here, will take whole bunch of tasks because you can program it to do almost everything. OK, all good, great, but bloody how? Just add more data.

And this put me in place where I could not make sense out of anything. I was sure I was missing something and tried finding additional literature - unfortunately these were such a mish-mash of wishful thinking that it only left me with more questions.

And then I found this book.

In a very concise way author gives the overview of current AI research and its rather sorry state.

Author is very to the point and he writes as if he was asked so many times about the AI [by people like me :)] that he decided to write a book to provide reference to everyone interested in the field.

Book is somewhere between popular and mid level science book. Few chapters that deal with logic and rules of logical reasoning might be uninteresting to people that are not in field of computer science or applied mathematics but rest of the book is accessible to everyone.

And what a damning picture this book paints. Presented with the possibility that there are no more major breakthroughs ahead (rather theoretical Nobel prizes notwithstanding I think there is still lot more practical research to be done) scientists took an unscientific approach - instead of research they changed their course and joined forces with the corporations. Corporations, being in their nature, decided to push their own products as they are, because any further research would cost, and marketing hype came in force. Result? Terrible. It only confirmed that for person with hammer every problem looks like a nail.

Due to the hype that came form all known authorities in the field (corporations and individual scientists associated with them) states started funding research that was using AI (in truth only classification engines) and neglecting others, that went more traditional way. As a result AI research was a major hit - nobody wanted to "waste time" when AI will definitely bring results (and if anyone asked how, answer was definitely "Add more data").

As author clearly states - entire AI research to date is based on constant futile attempts of simplifying human brain to the level of chain of data processors. Futile because this same attempt failed over and over again (including now, even with the enormous computer power and data collections). Reason? Very simple, how can one build intelligence when we do not know anything about our own intelligence process (when I read this I was stupefied, even after all these years we still do not have definitive answer on how our mind works, mind-blowing).

It is like entire science community decided to decipher how does automobile work by just looking at the outside parts and not being aware of the main part - engine. And expected good results. Blimey.

As a result complete AI research wasted good part of last decade. Significant improvements were made for classification systems and expert systems (as author says very very narrow AIs) but everything else was stopped in its tracks.

Unfortunately hype caused quite a social upheaval. I agree with the author, it looks like anti-human revolution took place, humans were discarded as used tools (it is incredible how this morbid cult of human irrelevance and expendability took root world wide in last decade) all in expectations of rise of our machine masters. Benevolent or not, it seems it does not matter to any of the technocratic leaders - they are so eager to give birth to something - without even knowing what exactly.

In a short time use of classification engines helped to create a divide between people by pushing news people like to read. It is not their error, mind you, they do what they are programmed to do but inadvertently this back-fired because of society totally surrendered itself to these computer idiot-savants for everyday news and information - from food to politics.

This is very timely book, and I hope that author's message to bring back sense in AI scientific research is accepted by the community. AI in any form can do wonders for humans but it must not be goal in itself. It is a device that can bring enlightenment and propel the humanity forward, but that can only be achieved without trickery [in scientific approach] and by following age old scientific approach (getting to theories and proving or disapproving them] that proved itself many times over.

Will it take time? Definitely. But this will help us to perform detailed and valuable research and, which might be more important, we will become mature enough to cope with the end-results.

Excellent book, highly recommended. ( )
  Zare | Jan 23, 2024 |
sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

Futurists are certain that humanlike AI is on the horizon, but in fact engineers have no idea how to program human reasoning. AI reasons from statistical correlations across data sets, while common sense is based heavily on conjecture. Erik Larson argues that hyping existing methods will only hold us back from developing truly humanlike AI.

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (3.91)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3 2
3.5
4 4
4.5
5 4

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 205,944,408 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible