Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... The Trick to Money Is Having Somepor Stuart Wilde
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. In this book, Stuart Wilde shows you that money is merely a form of energy, and that the difference between having it and not having it is merely a small but subtle shift in consciousness (in fact, one woman claims she won $1.7 million in the lottery using the techniques presented within these pages). Like his other highly successful books, this work is chock full of useful information and practical ideas. His breezy and comical style makes for effortless reading as you plot your path to complete financial freedom. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
'Money making is not a serious business. It is a game that you play. At first it may seem that it is a game that you play with forces outside of yourself - the economies of the marketplace, so to speak - but as you proceed you discover it is actually a game you play with yourself.' - Stuart Wilde Stuart Wilde's fifth book deals with the E.S.P. of easy money and the metaphysics of being in the right place at the right time, with the right idea and the right attitude. Like his other highly successful books, this work is chock full of useful information. His breezy and comical style makes for effortless reading, as you plot your path to complete financial freedom. Stuart shows you that money is merely a form of energy - and that the difference between having it and not having it is merely a small but subtle shift in consciousness. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)332.024Social sciences Economics Finance Miscellany And Personal Finance Personal FinanceClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
Personally there’s also a big reason for me to read him, which is why it’s always been hard for me to read him. I found out about him through Wayne, who’s an (evolved) codependent, and despite Stuart and Wayne being similar enough that they could be in a band, Stuart doesn’t have the same energy; he’s much rather be a black hat if it came to that, rather than fawn and flatter, if it came to that. They’re both successful, but Stuart’s energy fed Wayne and I know it could feed me, if I allow it to get past my defenses.
…. As for Stu’s philosophy, well, first for the politics part: I generally find libertarians to be a little exaggerated and comic, (in this age there do have to be a certain amount of grey bureaucrats to do the dull grey work, and some of them are in government, so the libertarians stand up in the middle of the pub and give a speech about men and liberty, you know 🗽), and certainly Stuart is part of that; he’s wild. But there are some good aspects to his philosophy, and not all in the not-specifically-libertarian bits.
Which leads into the other part, for example about yin and yang—although he’s very sparing about guru words, but they’re good words, quiet feminine yin and expansive masculine yang. Stuart says there’s an imbalance, and over-abundance of yang, in society, and of course he’s right. Even in the academy you have that, with the “hard sciences”, and clearly that’s not the only example. But I think it’s more personal than he implies: some people have too much yin. The new age subculture often has too much yin (not, incidentally, the same as a non-mistreatment of women situation), and Wild Stu is kinda the yang element in there himself. I myself have too much yin energy—not to such a fundamentalist extent as a femme mystique girl or boy (although I was one once, ten years ago), but even the scholar—at least the sort of scholar I am, often has too much yin. Stay at home, read books, feel safe. Of course, reading and writing can indeed be productive activity, but everything has its shadow, and the yin scholar often spends too much time on, stay at home, read books, feel safe. If you don’t have a serious in some sense goal of practical mastery and practical spirituality and ideas, and not Just the aspect that is different from that, well, it opens up the question as to whether or not you’re making a mistake….
Even Thoreau in Walden, which I just started awhile ago, opens the essays with one called Economics or something; it’s personal economics, and it’s Thoreau, and it’s Walden, you know. It’s worth thinking about. Of course, accepting is as important as having, and it’s always possible that you might die on some day you didn’t expect to have to, and spiritually and really it might not be a bad thing, but if a sea crawler grabs your leg, and holds you under, trying to drown you, is it not prudent—and appropriate—even as you understand that you don’t need, on some level to pump fear toxins into your body and attack yourself, (I mean, either in your body or in your mind you accept that the fear toxins aren’t helpful), but also, prudently, appropriately, try to get your head above water so that you can live; you go all-in and use up your energy reserves because we came to this place to live, right.