Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Rawls and Habermas: Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophypor Todd Hedrick
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. Hedrick reviews Rawls' and Habermas's political theories, taking them as the major exemplars of post-traditional or post-metaphysical political thinking, in which reason becomes "modest" and has no content of its own but merely provides the mechanism for justifying substantive content originating elsewhere. He summarizes their theories, compares and contrasts them, describes what he sees as the most important critiques of their work, lists their supporters and detractors, picks Habermas's as the strongest conception and explains why it's not totally irrelevant, despite some initial appearances, to the way politics is conducted here and now. This is an excellent book but it is demanding, requiring not only a familiarity with Rawls and Habermas but also a willingness to read carefully and think hard, but the effort is worth it as Hedrick situates these two seminal thinkers within the current intellectual context clearly and concisely. This ain't casual reading, but is certainly accessible to anyone who can read and understand Habermas. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
A critical evaluation of Rawlsian and Habermasian paradigms of political philosophy that offers an interpretation and defense of Habermas's theory of law and democracy as a superior alternative to Rawls's political liberalism. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNinguno
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)320.01Social sciences Political Science Political Science Political Science Philosophy and TheoryClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
He summarizes their theories, compares and contrasts them, describes what he sees as the most important critiques of their work, lists their supporters and detractors, picks Habermas's as the strongest conception and explains why it's not totally irrelevant, despite some initial appearances, to the way politics is conducted here and now.
This is an excellent book but it is demanding, requiring not only a familiarity with Rawls and Habermas but also a willingness to read carefully and think hard, but the effort is worth it as Hedrick situates these two seminal thinkers within the current intellectual context clearly and concisely.
This ain't casual reading, but is certainly accessible to anyone who can read and understand Habermas. ( )