1C

Este tema está marcado actualmente como "inactivo"—el último mensaje es de hace más de 90 días. Puedes reactivarlo escribiendo una respuesta.

1Andrew-theQM
Sep 17, 2017, 1:26 pm

Was it reckless of Michelle to go after the boy with the gun to see if he needed help?

2Carol420
Editado: Sep 17, 2017, 1:57 pm

That was her first TSTL moment. I'm sure she's only started having them:) A child can kill you just as dead as an adult.

3EadieB
Sep 17, 2017, 3:28 pm

I agree TSTL moment. Definitely reckless.

4bhabeck
Sep 17, 2017, 4:02 pm

of course it was reckless, but we're used to seeing that with Michelle. She tends to react first and think later.

5sushicat
Sep 17, 2017, 4:12 pm

What a way to acquire a client...

6Sergeirocks
Sep 17, 2017, 5:52 pm

It did appear impulsive, but we found out later that Michelle had spotted that the gun was disabled (if we can believe her) so perhaps this wasn't so reckless after all.

7bluebird_
Sep 17, 2017, 7:06 pm

It seemed so at the time, but once she revealed the gun was not usable it became more acceptable a move.

8Olivermagnus
Sep 17, 2017, 9:04 pm

I agree. Reckless, but if she knew the gun was disabled it wasn't too bad.

9Andrew-theQM
Sep 18, 2017, 6:02 pm

>6 Sergeirocks: I'm not sure I believe her.

10Andrew-theQM
Sep 18, 2017, 6:03 pm

Very reckless and I agree a TSTL moment.

Colin we refer to some actions as TSTL (Too Stupid to Live) moments.

11LadyJ71
Sep 18, 2017, 7:56 pm

She read the situation as the boy being scared and went with it. I also can't buy the story that she saw the trigger was missing in the dark with only the car headlights.

12ColinMichaelFelix
Sep 18, 2017, 10:28 pm

Reckless maybe but so Michelle

13Carol420
Sep 19, 2017, 6:02 am

>12 ColinMichaelFelix: That certainly is characteristic of Michelle.