Tony Williams (2)Reseñas

A horrid attempt to fuse literary device with historiography canon.

During Boston's smallpox outbreak in 1721, Puritan clergyman Cotton Mather and a young Benjamin Franklin found themselves on opposite sides of the inoculation question. One was for using a method known in Africa and Asia but only recently discovered by the European scientific community. The other was against this untried method that would likely spread the contagion rather than curb it. Surprisingly, Cotton Mather was the most prominent Bostonian advocating inoculation, while most of its physicians as well as Benjamin Franklin and his printer brother were against it. Using the smallpox epidemic as an example, the author explores the worldview of clergymen such as Cotton Mather who integrated science and religion.

The end notes and bibliography consist mainly of secondary sources; primary sources are limited to newspapers of the era, a few pamphlets, and published papers, diaries, journals, and autobiographies/memoirs. It is not suitable for an academic/scholarly audience, although it might be appropriate for a high school library collection. Recommended only for readers with a casual interest in the topic.½

Another bit of research for my Boston By Foot Dark Side tour, this one discussing the history of the smallpox pandemic of 1721. Cotton Mather, a religious conservative but also a man of science (and member of the Royal Society), responded by encouraging people to take inoculation with the only doctor willing to help him, Zabdiel Boylston. Mather partially credited the practice to his African slave Onesimus once again showing himself a man ahead of his time as he both thought African medicine valid and gave credit where credit was due. Mather faced much opposition both on superstitious and scientific grounds. His most surprising opponent was the New England Courant published by Benjamin Franklin's elder brother James whom one would assume would be on the side of reason and science. Williams holds that the smallpox pandemic and the inoculation controversy was the death knell of the Puritan covenant and forever changed the culture of Boston. He brings in lots of interesting details and facts of early 18th century Boston although at times it feels like he's padding an already thin book. Maybe this would hold together better as a long article rather than a book but I found it interesting and informative.

Nicely done and fun to read. Tony Williams' book follows the east coast path of a Hurricane (Hurricane of Independence) during early Sept of 1775 when the the Revolutionary War is taking shape. He uses the storm to show how weather can affect and shape historical events, not only physically but psychologically as well. His work touches on the influences of other weather systems (aside from the subject Hurricane ) on Revolutionary events to make his point. The book I feel at times gets a little disjointed, but I did like how he uses the hurricane (and other weather systems) to explore the lives of the people of the time.

It does not take long to realize that this book was written by a history teacher. Packed full of interesting facts and notes; it unfortunately does not flow. Although tied together (quite loosely) by a hurricane, the book jumps around chronologially as the author tells of the hurricane as it travels up the Atlantic coast. The author, in my opinion, assumes that the reader has a better than average knowledge of the main characters as he mentions politicans, battles, congresses, and military leaders in the years prior to the "Battle for Independence".
By chapter 12, you just want to finish. It is really a shame, because the author really knows his facts.