Kent Greenfield
Autor de The Myth of Choice
4 Obras 115 Miembros 10 Reseñas
Sobre El Autor
Kent Greenfield is professor of law and law fund research scholar, Boston College.
Obras de Kent Greenfield
Etiquetado
9781416500414 (1)
A good book on choice and free will written at a level for the amateur. Similar to a lot of other pop-social science books that seemt o be the rage. The writing was not as good as Gladwell or Ariely (1)
Autoayuda (1)
choice (2)
Ciencia (2)
cognitive (1)
Derecho (4)
Descuento (1)
Early Review (1)
Early Reviewers (1)
Economía conductual (1)
Energy Office (1)
Fall 2011 (1)
FarBed C2 (1)
Filosofía (2)
first-reads (1)
goodreads books (1)
her (1)
holiday 2011 (1)
incentives (1)
Kindle (1)
Libro electrónico (2)
Lista de deseos (4)
March 2012 (1)
need-to-find (1)
No ficción (11)
nudging (1)
Por leer (16)
Psicología (13)
psychology-and-behaviour (1)
September 2011 (1)
should-i-happen-upon (1)
socio-economics (1)
spl (1)
the-will-is-that-which-wins-out (1)
Trabajo (1)
unsortedISBN (1)
Wikler (1)
Wikler at Home (1)
Ética (2)
Conocimiento común
- Género
- male
- Ocupaciones
- professor (Law)
Miembros
Reseñas
The Myth of Choice: Personal Responsibility in a… por Kent Greenfield
Very nicely written, about what choice is and that there is a presumption of more choice than actually exists. From a legal and psych perspective more than a philosophical perspective. I thought his criticism of market economy was weak in spots but overall book very thoughtful and thought provoking.
Denunciada
steve02476 | 9 reseñas más. | Jan 3, 2023 | A genuine must-read book will help you interpret society in new and revealing ways.
Denunciada
elahrairah | 9 reseñas más. | Jan 2, 2021 | This is probably my fault for attempting to read this during a busy family weekend, but I found much of the discussion and topics raised to be better addressed in other books I have read. The odd use of photographs as well as the cursory attention paid to some of the issues made this a rather non-compelling read.
Denunciada
resoundingjoy | 9 reseñas más. | Jan 1, 2021 | Esta reseña ha sido escrita por los Primeros Reseñadores de LibraryThing.
Slightly more philosophical/political than many other popular books looking at the implications of behavioral psych, like our vulnerability to framing effects and habits. Among other things, Greenfield argues that because fish don’t know what water is—that is, our aspirations and beliefs are formed in contexts that shape what we think of as possible—we can’t limit condemnation of discrimination only when the targets “feel” discriminated against. This is an easier argument for me to accept with respect to my own preferences than some of those of others—he picks the very fraught example of the burqa; while my own intuitions tell me that it’s oppressive, I think the first step is to give women a bunch of other, real opportunities (yes, choices) in their lives. He’s best at challenging the idea that everything is okay if it was the result of “choice,” the common right-wing response to many problems today. Among other things, “if you’re given a choice between being pushed down an open elevator shaft or pushed down a staircase and you rationally pick the latter, it doesn’t mean you weren’t pushed, aren’t going down, and won’t get hurt on the way to the bottom.”
Greenfield diagnoses an equivocation on the meaning of “personal responsibility” that has worked to the benefit of individualizing rhetoric. One meaning is doing the right thing because you take responsibility; the other is that anything you choose is therefore fine (and this latter meaning does not offer any substantive theory of what the right thing might be). The latter meaning doesn’t work because of the many, many externalities we regularly impose on each other; if I don’t wear a helmet on my motorcycle, the damage I suffer in an accident will also result in costs to others.
Another issue: humans are generous in interpreting our own bad actions as the result of circumstances and not character, and stingy in interpreting the bad actions of others. Greenfield wants us to give the same empathy to other people as we regularly accord automatically to ourselves, which seems right. Especially since many of our “choices” are not particularly under our control in any meaningful sense, we should pay more attention to structural conditions under which choices are made. This also implies that the so-called “nudgers” are overselling the ability of small nudges such as structuring cafeterias to encourage healthy food choices to work in a world where, for example, big food companies have powerful incentives to keep fighting to provide us with fat, sugar, and salt. If we’re already subject to influences, especially directed influences, then nudges are just bringing a knife to a gun fight; we need more regulation.… (más)
Greenfield diagnoses an equivocation on the meaning of “personal responsibility” that has worked to the benefit of individualizing rhetoric. One meaning is doing the right thing because you take responsibility; the other is that anything you choose is therefore fine (and this latter meaning does not offer any substantive theory of what the right thing might be). The latter meaning doesn’t work because of the many, many externalities we regularly impose on each other; if I don’t wear a helmet on my motorcycle, the damage I suffer in an accident will also result in costs to others.
Another issue: humans are generous in interpreting our own bad actions as the result of circumstances and not character, and stingy in interpreting the bad actions of others. Greenfield wants us to give the same empathy to other people as we regularly accord automatically to ourselves, which seems right. Especially since many of our “choices” are not particularly under our control in any meaningful sense, we should pay more attention to structural conditions under which choices are made. This also implies that the so-called “nudgers” are overselling the ability of small nudges such as structuring cafeterias to encourage healthy food choices to work in a world where, for example, big food companies have powerful incentives to keep fighting to provide us with fat, sugar, and salt. If we’re already subject to influences, especially directed influences, then nudges are just bringing a knife to a gun fight; we need more regulation.… (más)
1
Denunciada
rivkat | 9 reseñas más. | Jun 13, 2016 | También Puede Gustarte
Autores relacionados
Namkwan Cho Cover designer
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 4
- Miembros
- 115
- Popularidad
- #170,830
- Valoración
- 4.0
- Reseñas
- 10
- ISBNs
- 9