Charles A. Crenshaw (1933–2001)

The book pats itself on the back for having testimony from someone who was actually present, but the majority of the content is instead a conspiracy case laid out in events this witness has no special insight in whatsoever. The parts that actually are in the realm of knowledge for Crenshaw are noteworthy but inconclusive as to what would be a conspiracy or just a confused situation with miscommunication flying every which way - what's abundantly clear however is that a presumed court case against Oswald would have been so full of chain of custody problems it's hard to see how they would have established anything beyond a reasonable doubt. Uncertainty over the documentation of entry and exit wounds, and a possible second autopsy are further major problems to a presumed trial. Of course none of that comes to pass. It's interesting to see Oswald end up with the same people who handled the president's body earlier.

While the authors swears he's writing for posterity, remember that this is just after the movie JFK was a smash hit and renewed interest in the topic. Many books were written to cash in.… (más)