I just like him, okay?
And I enjoy listening to him. And he was promoting the shhhhugar out of this on The Platform Formerly Known As Twitter.
It was great fun. Informative and snarky, it debunks the pop history of the monarchs up to Elizabeth I. Mitchell is definitely in the Richard III killed the princes (or at least had them killed) camp - so much for Josephine Tey. It's always a mistake to leave any other claimant to the throne alive. Monarchs were not the tourist attraction figureheads they are today. They were the totalitarian rulers who lived in danger of usurpation - of the fatal variety.

If Bill Bryson used cuss words and wrote a book about the British monarchy, this would be it. Funny, irreverent, and I afraid of finding the hilarity in a whole system that claims a gold hat makes you a ruler. The book flits between the facts of each monarch but doesn’t go too deep with any of them. Come for the history, stay for the humor. ( )

Although I enjoy history books, I wouldn't have bought this myself: I got it as a Christmas present. I've been dipping in and out of it since Boxing Day and finally finished it. I haven't seen much of this author's comedy as it didn't really appeal, and I found this book a mixed bag. The author doesn't like monarchs very much: the first were thugs and later ones idiots. He has some respect for one or two who were competent at their job. There are some insights into how Magna Carta and the development of Parliament was due to weak kings rather than strong ones.

Some bits were mildly amusing, whereas some was puerile schoolboy humour - he gets loads of mileage out of King Canute's/Cnut's name - and there's a lot of f* bomb as well. Plus various personal fixations about current day political issues etc. are aired, sometimes at length. Luckily, I've read or seen documentaries on a lot of it before or I think I would have got lost, especially since he often jumps about between periods of history or an individual monarch's reign and discusses things out of order.

There was some material I knew little about - the Anglo Saxon and Danish kings before Alfred the Great for example. And I have gaps in the Plantagenet dynasty. I did know about the war between King Stephen and Empress Matilda from reading/watching the Cadfael series since that is set against that background. The trouble is, the style doesn't really lend itself to helping me remember any of the bits I didn't already know about.

There's a really odd error around page 170 where he insists that the Order of the Garter moto, Honi soit qui mal y pense, is on the modern day passport. It isn't: the motto of the Royal family appears on it which is probably older - Dieu et mon droit. As this is easy to check it's strange that no one at the publishers picked it up. But it did make me wonder how carefully some of the other facts, new to me, were verified.

The book isn't a keeper but it finishes with praise of Shakespeare so it gains a star for that and overall I would judge it an OK 2 stars. ( )

What a very enjoyable read. A whirlwind tour through the Kings (and occasional Queens) of England delivered with both interesting history and various asides and tangents that are funny and interesting and also relevant. A friend recommended this and I really had fun with it. Parts of my US history background meant that I didn't know as much as I hoped but I learned alot and want to read more of the serious works he used to write this. Including at least one one my shelf right now.

A fascinating book, not quite the "Horrible Histories for grownups" as it's been tagged as the subject matter is rather depressingly more serious than that. Mitchell looks at the history of king and queen-dom rather than the history of individual kings and queens (though of course it is also that). He shows how the English monarchy evolved from the mythological King Arthur through the squabbling Saxon and Danish war-lords, the Norman invaders (who's hearts and interests were often more in France than England) and onwards to Elizabeth, the last of the Tudors. How the role of "King" (or "Queen" evolved from the toughest and wiliest leader to a hereditary office (with heredity often loosely claimed by the toughest and wiliest contender), an office held by God's appointed. Parallel is the development of what were to become our democratic institutions - initially put in place by other powerful men to counter the depredations of a weak or dangerous king rather than out of any altruistic notions of human rights... If I had any lingering feelings of British exceptionalism this book ensured they were well and truly dispensed with. An interesting read, with Mitchell's snide asides (which may date quite quickly) and hilarious captions to the illustrations leavening the somewhat depressing view of human nature the book provides. Recommended. ( )