This was originally intended to be no more than an instrument proving God existed. It soon however, morphed into a persecution of several theoretical fields of science of which civilization naively, and wrongly - it appears - idolizes. For me, the book began as a means to objectively explore, and ultimately debunk, that which appears to remove the possibility of a divine entity called "God" from scientific consideration. My search soon nonetheless, mutated into a figurative "witch-hunt", as I discovered the groundless propaganda being passed off as scientific conclusions to the mainstream populous. It appears the core scientific theories rigorously deployed and then popularized by the "godless" atheists, for purposes of removing God from public contemplation, are nothing more than science-fiction fantasies. Though it was never my intention to directly attack the scientific profession, I nevertheless, was compelled to express here my highly critical views of their research techniques, "data" and overall "modus operandi" for producing the mainstream anti-god theories of Evolution and The Big Bang. After a lifetime of having been exposed to the two iconic theories introduced through public education and perpetuated through media savvy members of the atheistic "humanist religion", I still only had a superficial knowledge of what the theorems contended and consisted of. It eventually became clear to me after researching the origins and substance of both, which are essential for sustaining the cause of atheism, that they are nothing more than hypotheses no more objectifiable or empirically valid than anything I have heard or read regarding the Bible. Having accepted, throughout my life, that belief in the Bible's content is primarily based on faith, I ignorantly assumed that accepted scientific philosophical principles were founded on vast amounts of theoretically unimpeachable evidence. After all, it has been government-funded educational institutions, and grant-sponsored scientific researchers, that have consistently provided decades of "Evolution" and "Big Bang" supporting data. Unfortunately, what I found in support of science's creation version named the "Big Bang", as well as its symbiotic species "Evolution" theory, is that they consist of nothing more than the groundless speculations of some very clever imaginations. In fact, I found the Bible to be more empirically and historically accurate - and far and away more conceivable than either- the evidence of which is presented here. Conventional atheists, or "non-believers", on the other hand, have a stringent and some would say a "one dimensional", closeminded philosophy that conceptually revolves around rejecting the possibility of a divine spiritual entity in any form. This, even though they are universally willing - in general - to accept unsubstantiated "universe operational theories" as fact including; the Big Bang Theory, Evolution Theory, and even space alien intervention, among others. Honestly though, from all I have read and learned, the amount of empirical evidence supporting any mainstream, anti-god theory is so pitiful that building a case on it requires an epic leap into the realm of science-fiction fantasy. Seriously, despite myself being no model "believer", and would like to personally embrace one of these alternatives as a possible means by which to escape the moral accountability implicit in an awareness of a biblical-based deity; no compelling proof exists to justify a such a pyrimidine shift. As a matter of fact, it's perplexing to me that anyone who has critically analyzed the philosophical genesis and reasons for the successful deployment of these deluded, often incoherent, scientifically deranged, and dramatically contradicting theories can take any of them seriously.