Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Bomb: The Race to Build - and Steal - the World's Most Dangerous Weapon (2012 original; edición 2018)por Steve Sheinkin (Auteur)
Información de la obraBomb: The Race to Build - and Steal - the World's Most Dangerous Weapon por Steve Sheinkin (2012)
Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. Great book. Amazing story of develop and amazing details of spy activity worldwide. ( ) I like that Sheinkin made this engaging enough to hold a teen's attention (primarily from first hand accounts from those involved) without resorting to childish gimmicks - I'd have no problem handing this to an adult that wants a quick, suspenseful primer on the development of the atomic bomb and the start of the cold war. He really humanized the scientists that developed it and the spies that betrayed its secrets. It was a fascinating look into the world of espionage. This book took me off guard, while it had excellent reviews, the subject matter was one that kind of creeped me out. what I was not expecting was a book that was exciting to read and insightful enough to make me not be quite so close minded about the building of the atomic bomb. while I still obviously find the atomic bomb a horrific part of history, and this book does to, I have a much better understanding of the historical context that caused the scientists to be willing to pursue such a tragic plan of action. What makes this book so great? It reads WAY more like a novel than any other nonfiction book I can think of. What makes this book disorienting? It reads WAY more like a novel than any other nonfiction book I can think of. Here is the disorienting part: How could the author know for a fact so many of the little details that make this book read like a thriller? From gestures to facial expressions to the way a person was feeling, it's hard to believe that such minutia was ever documented. As an adult reader, it took me out of the story every time I came across a detail that seemed made up for the sake of making the book read better. I don't want to accuse the author of making things up. Still, the source notes did not exactly quell my disbelief. How much does this kind of thing matter? I'm not certain it really matters in this book (all the important stuff is documented), but I think the slippery slope argument applies. If nonfiction authors can insert imagined little details, will this eventually lead to more insidious dramatizations? Is sticking to the facts more important than good storytelling? Back to the book itself. It's riveting, exciting, scary, almost unbelievable. There are scientists, spies, soldiers, secrets, Soviets, and many other exciting s-words. I think there was at least one use of strong language, and some of the themes are downright nightmarish (um, total world annihilation) so I would recommend this for older readers, probably 12 and up. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
PremiosListas Notables
Recounts the scientific discoveries that enabled atom splitting, the military intelligence operations that occurred in rival countries, and the work of brilliant scientists hidden at Los Alamos. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Discusiones actualesNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)623.4Technology Engineering and allied operations Military Engineering and Marine Engineering Technology of Weapons and ArmamentsClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |