Marten H. Woudstra

I got this commentary on the recommendation of a professor who taught a class on Joshua. This book was okay. The scholarship is good and Woodstra really attends to the text and tries to read well. On the other hand, he is either no cognizant or doesn't feel like addressing some of the issues in the text. When I read this commentary next to Hawk, or Hess, or Creach. I was rather bored by it.

Case 9 shelf 3