Imagen del autor

Robert Scholes

Autor de The Nature of Narrative

45+ Obras 1,471 Miembros 17 Reseñas 1 Preferidas

Sobre El Autor

Robert Scholes is Research Professor of Modern Culture and Media at Brown University. He is the author of many books of literary theory. (Bowker Author Biography)
Créditos de la imagen: Brown University

Obras de Robert Scholes

The Nature of Narrative (1966) 157 copias
Protocols of Reading (1989) 66 copias
Elements of Fiction (1968) — Editor — 64 copias
The Practice of Writing (1981) 60 copias
The Crafty Reader (2001) 57 copias
Writing through Literature (2001) 34 copias
Structural Fabulation (1975) 26 copias
Paradoxy of Modernism (2006) 22 copias
Elements of Poetry (1765) 20 copias
Elements of Drama (1971) 16 copias
FABULATION & METAFICTION (1979) 12 copias
Some Modern Writers (1971) 7 copias
In Search of James Joyce (1992) 6 copias
The fabulators (1967) 6 copias
Elements of Writing (1656) 5 copias
Elements of the essay (1969) 4 copias

Obras relacionadas

Dublineses (1914) — Editor, algunas ediciones19,790 copias
Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama (1995) — Contribuidor, algunas ediciones929 copias
Introducción a la literatura fantástica (1970) — Introducción, algunas ediciones448 copias
Nebula Award Stories 10 (1975) — Contribuidor, algunas ediciones106 copias
Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays (1976) — Autor — 37 copias
Future Females: A Critical Anthology (1981) — Contribuidor — 17 copias
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 16) (1963) — Contribuidor; Contribuidor, algunas ediciones2 copias
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 17) — Contribuidor — 2 copias
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 15) — Contribuidor — 2 copias

Etiquetado

Conocimiento común

Otros nombres
Scholes, Robert Edward
Fecha de nacimiento
1929-05-19
Género
male
Nacionalidad
USA
Lugar de nacimiento
Brooklyn, New York, USA
Educación
Cornell University (PhD|1959)
Yale University
Ocupaciones
literary critic
professor
Organizaciones
Brown University

Miembros

Reseñas

Nims on late Yeats is particularly good, and Hugh Kenner's "Art in a Closed Field" is a concise and entertaining summary of his views on the links between aesthetics and technology. Today it reads like a modernist response to prophets of interactive fiction and other post-modern devices.
½
 
Denunciada
jwm24 | Aug 3, 2013 |
Esta reseña ha sido escrita por los Primeros Reseñadores de LibraryThing.
I really appreciated Scholes's consideration of the place of the English Department in an academic world that's increasingly about students studying the practical, the career-oriented. On the one hand, I agree with him that the teaching of reading and the teaching of writing retain a significant importance, even if we become more and more a "service" department. I agree that the modernist privileging of difficult works needs to be dethroned, and that cultural studies should become an important part of what English departments do. On the other, many of his examples struck me as quixotic in the extreme, to the point of derailing his arguments. The first few chapters are absolutely the strongest.… (más)
 
Denunciada
chelseagirl | 10 reseñas más. | Jun 13, 2012 |
Esta reseña ha sido escrita por los Primeros Reseñadores de LibraryThing.
In this slim volume, Scholes presents his plea for the continuing relevance of the humanities as both a body of scholarship and a uniquely powerful tool for understanding and sorting the information with which we are daily saturated. Scholes deftly analyzes of a variety of different forms, from scripture to opera, in defense of his position that textuality -- what people really read and write -- rather than literature, should be the proper object of instruction in literature courses.
 
Denunciada
dianegreco | 10 reseñas más. | Mar 6, 2012 |
Esta reseña ha sido escrita por los Primeros Reseñadores de LibraryThing.
LibraryThing user dekesolomon's review of English After the Fall is succinct and accurate - unlike Scholes' own treatise on the evolution of English studies. The premise of Robert Scholes' text is one I certainly agree with - he identifies a need for English department to evolve, both for their own survival and for the benefit of students. As one of the "lowly" adjuncts both Scholes and Deke identify, I have very strong opinions about the state of compositional studies, and some specific ideas about how to change things for the good of all; I do not think Scholes would agree with many of my assessments.

Scholes suggests that the way to extend the life of English departments is to look beyond the traditional canon and recognize other genres as texts worthy of study. This would likely have been a radical idea twenty years ago, but my own experiences as a student suggest that Scholes is behind the curve; I, for example, took courses on Japanese theatre, contemporary fiction, American travel narratives, and a host of other genres that are traditionally "nonliterary" as an undergraduate, and continue to use "nonliterary" sources in my own courses. Much of Scholes' arguments are lost in his enthusiasm for specific texts, and for a reader unfamiliar with the operas and films on which he fixates, his text as a whole loses its power.

Whiles Scholes certainly identifies many of the problems now facing English departments, his "solution" seems to aggravate many of the current difficulties of teaching the subject by continuing to present material that undergraduates will not find compelling (i.e. opera), as opposed to addressing some of the most immediate concerns: a need for students to learn how to communicate effectively, whether or not they pursue English courses beyond the requirements of Freshman Composition.
… (más)
 
Denunciada
London_StJ | 10 reseñas más. | Jan 2, 2012 |

Premios

También Puede Gustarte

Autores relacionados

Estadísticas

Obras
45
También por
9
Miembros
1,471
Popularidad
#17,464
Valoración
3.9
Reseñas
17
ISBNs
97
Idiomas
3
Favorito
1

Tablas y Gráficos