Rajmohan GandhiReseñas

Most North Indians are familiar with the history of North India, especially the Mughals and The East India Company. We are unfamiliar with the Delhi Sultanate or the period before Muslim rule. We are also unfamiliar with the history of other parts of India, especially East or South India.
Rajmohan Gandhi's book is an excellent place to start, especially for those who wish to gain a first understanding. However, the book is not perfect. The sections on the 20th and 21st centuries are confusing.

It is intriguing to note South India's more passive role during the British Raj. After Tipu Sultan's death, resistance to The East India Company almost died in South India.

A welcome aspect of the book is its focus on the role of a few Britishers in studying and preserving South Indian texts.
He could have done better. For instance, he quotes John Wilks widely while acknowledging the gentleman's negative bias against Tipu Sultan. Why didn't he research and quote other authors to deliver a balanced and nuanced perspective on Tipu Sultan (among others)?

Revenge & Reconciliation: Understanding South Asian History by Rajmohan Gandhi (1999)

A detailed chronological biography of the Sardar. The author has also written biographies of his paternal and maternal grandfathers, the Mahatma and Rajagopalachari respectively. Rajmohan often defends Patel against accusations apparently levelled against him: that he commanded party discipline with coercion; held a bias against Muslims; disputed bitterly with Nehru; lacked vision in international politics; and favoured the interests of industrialist friends over socialist colleagues.

This is an excellent book. Rajmohan Gandhi does an exceedingly good job of putting together a story of Punjab in one volume.
There is much to commend this book. Early history is not always easy and often seems confusing when seen from the perspective of the modern-day world. However, he has done admirably and presents the sweep of history with a deft hand.
We get an idea of some of the early conflicts and realise how they have been aggrandised by later day political leaders.
I would have liked some more detail on some of the recent events in Punjab, especially the Khalistani movement, but that may be in the scope of the next edition.

I am giving this book a two star rating, because I believe that it is built on the wrong premise. While it is written in a pacy manner, it does not do justice to the promise. What I like, from my perspective, is the introduction to William Howard Russell.

First off, I do not see a connection between the Indian Mutiny and the American Civil War, except that they were fought at approximately the same time in history. A few years divides them both. However, the Civil War is that - a Civil War. If the blacks had mutinied, I would have seen a connection. A parallel to the American War of Independence would have been better.

The fact that Russell covered both to an extent, is not enough to connect the two.

Two, the "connections" at the end of the book are tenuous at best, barring the estimable Mr Hume who founded the Indian National Congress and Mohammed Sayyid. I fail to see the relevance of Bakim Chandra, Tolstoy and Karl Marx in the larger picture of these two wars. How do they connect the two wars?

What are the lessons of each war that make them similar? I fail to see this. The analysis of both wars is, in my opinion, superficial. There is no real analysis of their connection, barring the fact that Russell was present during both, and the fact that they both took place in the 1850's.

Not a book to invest your time on.

As Khushwant Singh says, “A More Heroic Tale Has Yet to Be Told”. A must read for every Indian and every human soul. It is a true story which has all the dramatics of a million dollar movie and yet what captivates us is the beauty of the simplicity of its hero. Every page of Mohandas has a lesson for humanity. Read it, any of it can change your life.