![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0415241502.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Trajan: Optimus Princeps (Roman Imperial Biographies)por Julian Bennett
![]() Ninguno Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Pertenece a las series
Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.
|
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
![]() GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)937.07History and Geography Ancient World Italian Peninsula to 476 and adjacent territories to 476 Italian Peninsula to 476 and adjacent territories to 476 Constitutional 31 B.C.-284 A.D.Clasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:![]()
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
Machiavelli coined the term "Five Good Emperors", including Trajan among them, and it would appear that Bennett primarily aims to explore whether Trajan really deserves to be considered one of the good emperors. Apparently, at least to a large degree, he does; and Bennett establishes that this assessment is not due to a dearth of available information, but based on a sound evaluation of his regime – although he also judges Trajan’s reign to be as autocratic as that of Domitian, only going about it more subtly and indirectly. - In the final chapter (titled "A Perfect Prince?"), Bennett comments regarding Trajan’s Parthian war: "It seems to have been brought about by the need for personal glory alone, a contemporary Falklands Factor, and conforms to a worrying and well-recognized tendency among established political leaders of any period, if especially so of the present, to seek internal prestige by diverting attention away from matters at home and interfering in the affairs of foreign states." – This comparison between Roman imperial policy and that of "political leaders of any period" might be stretching it a bit far. And perhaps Bennett's way of judging a matter such as this is also a contributing factor to why Trajan, the man himself, remains relatively obscure throughout the pages of this book – and it’s more for this reason, rather than because of the excessive dryness of the text, that I ultimately found this (imperial) biography of Trajan a bit of a disappointment. He deserves better.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. (