Nikos Kazantzakis u lind më 18 shkurt 1883 në Iraklion, Kretë, Perandoria Osmane (tani në Greqi) ndërsa vdiq më 26 tetor 1957, në Freiburg im Breisgau, në Gjermani). Ishte shkrimtar grek, shumë produktiv, shumëllojshmëria e veprave të së cilit përfaqësojnë një kontribut të madh në letërsinë moderne greke.
Kazantzakis lindi gjatë periudhës së revoltës së Kretës kundër sundimit nga Perandoria Osmane dhe familja e tij iku për një kohë të shkurtër në ishulln grek të Naxos. Ai studioi drejtësi në Universitetin e Athinës (1902-06) dhe filozofi në henri Bergson në Paris (1907-09). Më pas ai bëri një udhëtim të gjerë në Spanjë, Angli, Rusi, Egjipt, Palestinë dhe Japoni, për t’u vendosur para Luftës së Dytë Botërore në ishullin Egina. Ai shërbeu si ministër në qeverinë greke (1945) dhe punoi për Organizatën e Kombeve të Bashkuara për Arsimin, Shkencën dhe Kulturën (UNESCO) në Paris (1947-48). Më pas ai u transferua në Antibes, në Francë.

Not one of his most famous works and, sadly, for good reason. Set in a small village during the Greek Civil War of the late 1940s, the story follows Father Yanaros, a 70-year-old priest who is determined to bring the sides together. It takes place during Holy Week and the story of Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection is Kazantzakis’s framework. Unfortunately, I thought he beat his theme to death. All three sides—the two warring factions (the fascists and the communists) and the priest himself—are completely intransigent; no one is willing to budge. Add to the mix, Kazantzakis’s personal devotion to Lenin (Kazantzakis became disenchanted with Communism after he watched Stalin in action) and the way he suggests that Lenin himself might be the second coming of Christ. I will say that he is enormously passionate and the book benefits from that, but in the end, it wasn't enough to save the book. ( )

300/32 ( )

> Babelio : https://www.babelio.com/livres/Kazantzakis-Les-freres-ennemis/370278

> Kazantzaki est un auteur captivant et d'une belle écriture,c'est vraiment mon auteur Grec préféré. le Christ recrucifié et Zorba sont aussi très bien.
—Danieljean (Babelio)

> Nikos Kazantzaki : Les frères ennemis (Plon).
Se reporter au compte rendu de Christian AUDEJEAN
In: Revue Esprit Nouvelle série, No. 338 (5) (MAI 1965), pp. 1108-1110… ; (en ligne),
URL : https://esprit.presse.fr/article/christian-audejean/nikos-kazantzaki-les-freres-... ( )

The plot to The Fratricides is pretty simple. A small Greek town is at war with a group of communist rebels who live in the surrounding hills, constantly harassing them. There is a monk in town who advocates peace and understanding, but to no avail. Part of his credibility is undermined because it’s his own son who is leading the rebels. The monk tries to overcome the violence and ignorance all around him, all while fighting his own crises of faith.

He wonders, has God forsaken man, or has God simply given us brains and left the world’s affairs up to us? Are the communists who are trying to overthrow the government the real patriots, fighting for the common man and justice? Are they the real Christians, despite their professed atheism? Is either side ‘right’, or are both sides doing irreparable harm to Greece?

The monk finds himself all too alone. The men of the world are savage and violent to one another. Those who profess to be Christians act in conflict with the ideals of Christ, and it seems that “Blessed are the warmakers.” The organized men of faith are hypocritical and far from holy, a common theme in Kazantzakis’s books.

Kazantzakis uses The Fratricides to make several points: To truly be holy one must lead a life of true sacrifice and asceticism. Man needs to be free, and needs to be fierce to attain that freedom (certainly spiritually), but it’s a dilemma as to whether war should be waged. And lastly, as both sides in the conflict suffer in-fighting, one gets the impression that even if one side was victorious, that discontent and violence would continue on, for “How can you change the world when you cannot change man?”

In that sense it’s ultimately a bit pessimistic in its view, though that’s not the reason for the mediocre rating. Kazantzakis’s writing is lean and full of passion which I like, but in this case the book seems a bit one-dimensional in the analogy of the monk to Christ. It gets a bit repetitive and should have either been pared down, or had other characters or aspects of life fleshed out. ( )