Should probably have been entitled Mr. Savage and Dr. Johnson but the author couldn’t resist the analogy. There is little of Johnson and lots of Savage in this biography but you couldn’t hardly help it since Johnson only knew Savage for two years. Besides, we already have the greatest Biography ever written by [a:James Boswell|55078|James Boswell|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1211406656p2/55078.jpg]

Minor English poet [a:Richard Savage|4740152|Richard Savage|https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/nophoto/user/u_50x66-632230dc9882b4352d753eedf9396530.png], would be practically unknown if he hadn’t met the Great Cham in 1737. He had a profound effect on the youthful, naive Johnson, so much so that Johnson wrote one of the early narrative biographies about the dissolute poet. Holmes biography, while having access to primary sources Johnson did not (or simply chose to ignore), tries to correct some of the inconsistencies and oversights that the author sees in [a:Samuel Johnson|22191|Samuel Johnson|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1209488222p2/22191.jpg]’s [b:Life of Richard Savage|1031387|Life of Richard Savage|Samuel Johnson|https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/nophoto/book/50x75-a91bf249278a81aabab721ef782c4a74.png|1017650]. Now this is all well and fine, but Johnson actually KNEW Savage in person as well as having access to some of the same primary sources, so like every biography it’s another exercise in speculation, as Johnson’s was as well. Otherwise, why would there ever be more than one biography to a customer?

That said, I devour anything by and about Johnson so this was a good read for me even if I’m skeptical about some of the conclusions. There is lots of detail outside of reading between the lines. To be fair, the author does note where we just aren’t certain about things. And that ends my incomplete paragraph. ( )

It is the quality of that friendship I have tried to carry back over the dark river, and the impact it has had on the art of biography ever since.

2.5 stars

During 1738 and 1739 the young Samuel Johnson, struggling to find his way in London, made a fast friendship with the poet Richard Savage. The latter having been recently pardoned after murdering a patron in a pub brawl. On a few occasions the pair walked the streets, for want of lodging , and discussed literature and politics throughout the night. There are no surviving correspondence between the pair nor any accounts of anyone seeing them together. What follows is Richard Holmes examining the journals and court records to configure the sequence and significance of this encounter. It is a stretch and the sleuthing is at time tiring. It would've helped if Holmes had a romantic interest during his investigation -- then we could title it Possession. ( )

A very interesting examination of the relationship between Samuel Johnson and Richard Savage which is also a critical biography of Savage, a reflection on the genre of biography and an insightful account/speculation about the inner life of Samuel Johnson. ( )

This biography allows the reader to peek inside the friendship of Johnson and Savage at the brief moment in history when their lives meet. I will not offer any further information as it has been a while since I have read this book, but I do remember it portraying an extremely different picture of Johnson than the one painted by Boswell. Well worth a look. ( )

Dr. Johnson & Mr. Savage is what might be referred to as a microbiography: author Richard Holmes offers full portraits of neither title character, but rather an examination of the short period when the lives of Samuel Johnson - lexicographer, author, poet, and biographical subject extraordinaire - and Richard Savage - poet, rogue, and murderer - converged for a time. Savage, Johnson's first biographical subject himself, made Johnson's acquaintance soon after that young provincial arrived in London, and their companionship lasted for just about two years, until Savage departed for "retirement" in Wales.

Holmes has little to go on: while it's known that Johnson and Savage knew each other, "there are no authenticated letters between the two men, no mention of each other in private journals, not even a single surviving account from an eyewitness of seeing the two men in each other's company." And yet he's done quite a lot with what few scraps of evidence that do exist, creating an interesting web of narrative around a skeleton of knowable facts. While I am afraid that his speculatory meanderings (particularly in the realm of psychology) get the better of him at times (I felt the same about Greenblatt's recent biography of Shakespeare), Holmes generally at least informs the reader of his upcoming leaps, which is comforting if not exculpatory.

As the author notes, the Johnson we meet cavorting with Savage is not the frumpy but majestic old fellow that Boswell has left us, but a young, desperate man out to make his way in the world, captivated by this strange, conflicted, down-and-out poet. It's another side to Johnson that is interesting to find, even within Holmes' imperfect framework.

http://philobiblos.blogspot.com/2006/09/book-review-dr-johnson-mr-savage.html ( )