Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.
Kirk and his crew time-travel back to 1986 San Francisco where they encounter the alien life of punk, pizza and exact-change buses while trying to capture two almost-extinct humpback whales to take back with them to the 23rd century.
Nine times out of ten, when humor and the original Star Trek cast mix, the result is a disaster. But in this case, it's brilliant. It's not quite as good a movie as Wrath of Khan, but it's close.
Concept: D Story: C Characters: B Dialog: A Pacing: B Cinematography: C Special effects/design: B Acting: B Music: C
A lot of Star Trek fans would name this as their favorite Trek film--or at least top three. I wouldn't go that far. But then don't mind me, "Save the Whales" messages make me grind my teeth. But it was nice after the first three films to see a more light-hearted, comedic take, and it was rather fun to see a rather loopy Spock and a Kirk who for once was a fish out of water. ( )
Kirk and his crew time-travel back to 1986 San Francisco where they encounter the alien life of punk, pizza and exact-change buses while trying to capture two almost-extinct humpback whales to take back with them to the 23rd century.
)
shelldvds | Aug 22, 2007 | 
Google Books — Cargando...
(4.22)
5
Nine times out of ten, when humor and the original Star Trek cast mix, the result is a disaster. But in this case, it's brilliant. It's not quite as good a movie as Wrath of Khan, but it's close.
Concept: D
Story: C
Characters: B
Dialog: A
Pacing: B
Cinematography: C
Special effects/design: B
Acting: B
Music: C
Enjoyment: A
GPA: 2.7/4 (