![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://pics.cdn.librarything.com/picsizes/23/47/2347240ace9a70a5968436c6f67433041414141_v5.jpg)
Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Just Three Wordspor Melissa Brayden
![]() Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. This is the second book in the Soho Loft Series. The series follow the lives and romances of four friends: Brooklyn, Samantha, Hunter and Mallory. The first of the series was Kiss the Girl, Brooklyn’s story which had age gap. This one is friends-to-lovers – and definitely amongst the best friends-to-lovers stories. Read the full review @https://www.bestlesficreviews.com/2019/01/just-three-words-by-melissa-brayden.html Right, I should probably actually get around to rating and reviewing this book. Though I kind of don't want to do so. The thing that I had mentioned in my review for the previous book in this series? About being reluctant to dive into this series because everyone and their pet donkey absolutely loved these books? And I didn't want to be the late comer who comes, reads, and finds everything wrong/negative/bad. Was self-conscious about that. Well, I read the first book in this series and, while there were issues I had with it, I still loved the book. So, naturally I started . . . a book in a different series. Another one I kind of feared actually reading since so many seems to love the series. There, though, I found myself loathing the main characters. So, I've kind of put that book on the back burner. I'll probably read and finish it eventually. So, I dove into the second book in this series, this book here. Had been reluctant when I noticed, from the description, that the main coupling here would involve Hunter and Sam - two long term friends and business partners. Rereading what I've written up to this point and I messed up, eh? I had meant to reference my reluctance to read the books in this series, mention that I loved the first book in the series, then mention that some of my fear was found to come true with this book here. The book that people I'm friends with and/or follow gave a higher average rating to than the previous book. Well, enough of that -- This book involves Hunter, the ad agency's graphic artist, and Sam, the ad agency's accountant. Being that this is a book that involves a group of friends, and an advertising agency, the people from the prior book, for the most part, also pop up in this one. Even Brent (though less so this time around), Jessica's assistant. Jessica had a much smaller role in this book, and was almost not in it. Ashton had roughly the same amount of page time as Jessica in this book, though only because she got hired, at some point in the process, as an intern. Brooklyn had a larger role than Jessica or Ashton, but a much reduced one from the previous book. Mal, the fourth friend in the four friend group, had about the same amount of pages this time as in the first book. I was going to dive into this book immediately after finishing the first in the series, but stopped myself because of the fact that it involved Hunter and Sam. Seemed a tiny bit incestuous. Not that they were sisters or anything like that, but they kind of love each other like that, right? No? Maybe not. Well, anyway, that's why I dove into a different book before moving to this one when that one tanked. And the reason why I didn't want to dive immediately in this book is one of the main problem areas for the coupling/romance here. As in, they are friends, and business partners, they don't want to ruin either their friendship or their company/ad agency. So, every time they are offered a choice, they take the path that seems more inclined to safe-guard the friendship/business while also likely to be adverse to a successful relationship. This is a two person point of view book. Hunter and Sam. I know there are people who like to include rants about books that are first person books, that have just one point of view (which is not necessarily the same thing as a first person book), but sometimes that is a better solution. Largely, a two person point of view book worked better in this situation. Largely. Because both of their lives/back stories/emotions/etc. was needed - more, at least, than can be gotten if only one of their point of views was present. It did cause me to wish to never read another romance again, though. Because, at some point, the book broke down into something like this: *scene opens during a thunderstorm. Night, late night. A woman jerks awake as thunder booms. She blinks. Licks her lips. Her lips are dry. She licks them again. Shrugs, gets up, and heads to the kitchen. She then spots another person there. The woman is kind of awestruck by the vision before her. Unable to control themselves, they press their lips into the other persons. Thunder booms. Lightening lights up the apartment.* External chatter: Person 1: whaaa Person 2: ... *person two, the kisser, then turns and returns to their room* *next day, kitchen at work* External chatter: Person 1: what happened last night? What was that about? Person 2: I couldn't stop myself. *internal chatter acquired via POV: I wish to continue kissing you until the sun implodes* We . . . we shouldn't do it again, right? *internal: please want to do it again* Person 1: aaah . . *swallows; internal chatter acquired via POV2: yes, let's, kiss me, please . . nooo, it will ruin everything!!!* aaah . not again . never again. Person 2: Right. Um. Right. *Internal: crap* Person 1: back to work. *grins weakly. *internal: crap* *scene 2: apartment* Person 1: I just can't keep myself off of you! . . um . . sex with benefits? I mean friends with benefits? No strings? *internal: please want strings. I wish to hump you until the end of time* Person 2: Ahh, I don't . . know if ahh . . *swallows* ookay. Right. Friends with benefits. No strings. *internal: darn, well, she can't be any other way. Not built for relationships. I want to hump her until the end of time, oh well.* Repeat these scenes six hundred more times. Well, not specifically kissing and humping. But the conversations and the internal desires being hidden. Oh, and Brayden, in these two books I've read, seems to like to have big flashing blinking lights foreshadowing conflict points. Happened in first book. Happened in this one. I knew exactly what was going to happen because of that foreshadow point in the first book. I kind of had a 'um, that's not good' kind of reaction this time, but my brain didn't follow to the logical conflict point that would result from this foreshadowing ( Also like in the first book, friends, family, business, etc. play big parts in this book here. The family that matters specifically in this one is Hunter's. Hunter and her great relationship with her mother, and horrible relationship with her father; plus there is a straight sister, and a younger brother in the mix as well. There are some important, very important need to know, plot points that I could mention, but I do not feel up for it. This is another book that I felt would end up highly rated, by me. I thought the first book was heading towards me creating a brand new top level shelf just to place that book on it (a 6 star shelf), only to have the book annoy me at a specific point. With that information presented - this one felt like it was a much better book than the previous . . . until a specific point that occurred much earlier in percentage terms. From something like 60% to 70% I was seriously considering putting the book on a DNF shelf; burning all my romance books; deleting all my digital romance books; never reading another romance book ever again. I said something in my status updates that relates to the issue. It was around midnight and I worded things badly. I know women are stereotyped as being chatters, as being more open with emotions and feelings than, say, men (while women also - from the male perspective, saying things like 'you know why I'm angry. I shouldn't have to say why'). That doesn't mean that lack of communication/miscommunication doesn't happen between two women. It can and does happen. I'm just tired of it being a major plot point in romance books. My status update made some kind of comment, something like 'I moved from MF to FF because I wanted to try to get away from this failure to communicate (because men are fucking morons, right?)'. What I didn't mention at the time is one simple fact. Lack of communication? Miscommunication? Is something I've run into a lot more often in lesbian books than in non-lesbian books. Actually, I could probably just say LGBT books, as I've also run into it more often in FF as well as MM books. More often than in MF books. But, alas, I managed to finish the book. And need to find some method of rating. I can’t just leave it unrated. It’s confusing. I’m both inclined to rate this book 2 stars. And inclined to rate it 5. And no, I have no desire to merge the two together, take an average, and rate the book 3.5 stars. No, this is not a 3.5 star book. It’s either a 2 star book, or a 5 star book. Maybe I should flip a coin. Okay, I flipped a coin. 2 times it landed tails (2 stars), 1 time it landed heads (5 stars). Therefore, and naturally, that means I rate this book something. Hmm, flipped the three coins one more time each. 2 heads, 1 tails. Meaning 3 and 3. Luck is no help! February 4 2016 The second book in the SoHo Loft Romances I was very eagerly awaiting this novel from the moment I saw that it existed. I will say that it took me a few pages to get back into the lives of the four SoHo Loft friends (Hunter, Brooklyn, Mallory, and Sam), but once I did this book was just plain awesome. Like the last novel in the series, Kiss the Girl, this novel follows the story of one of the friends, although that is technically tilted on its side a bit because it winds up following the story of two of the friends, Sam and Hunter. It was an interesting twist for the reader especially, we already knew a bit about the characters from the first book and so this one wasn't your typical lesbian fiction by any means (it was better). And I thought the will they or won't they end up together was even more in doubt than usual, and I was kept guessing. As usual the secondary characters were as great as the four main characters. The Tanya stuff, the Libby stuff, and even the April stuff were really well done. And then there was Hunter's family. It was such an amazingly wirten family, and its family dynamics were spot on too. Add to that the nursing home residents who were also perfectly written (and the guys in Sam's class especially really cracked me up). While the plot was great, the characters and relationships are this novel's selling point for sure. Okay, so... what's gonna happen with Mallory then?? Heh heh... I got this advanced galley through Netgalley on behalf of Bold Strokes Books. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Pertenece a las seriesPremios
Sometimes the one you want is the one you least suspect... Accountant Samantha Ennis craves order and structure. As the bookkeeper at the boutique advertising agency she owns with her three best friends, it's her job to apply logic to the chaos. When one of those best friends, laid back Hunter Blair, moves in to share her loft apartment, Sam's carefully organized world is thrown wildly askew. Hunter Blair's been the coolest one in the room since elementary school. Until recently, her biggest worry in the world was which of the girls in her cell phone to call on a Saturday night. But it's not long before Samantha sparks a fire in Hunter that has her questioning her old habits and longing for new ones. Isn't it a bad idea to fall for one of your best friends? Samantha and Hunter are about to find out. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
![]() GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)813.6Literature English (North America) American fiction 21st CenturyClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:![]()
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
But just like Kiss the Girl, the plot contrivances are honestly absurd. A breakup precipitated when the MC hears her girlfriend CALLING INTO A RADIO SHOW. IN 2015. (Or thereabouts, right? They have iphones. It's statistically impossible that this would happen and that it would be heard.) There's really no need for contrived, dramatic obstacles! The personalities of the characters are enough!
It's honestly embarrassing, plot-wise, and the dehumanization of The Ex as basically an object to cause trouble is sort of depressing in a book all about women (it reminds me of throwaway Rival Women in heterosexual romances).
Hunter and Sam are wonderful, if both a little too perfect, and I was oddly touched by Hunter's family drama. Stuff like Sam's lovable old folks are well-worn ground, but still warm and funny to me, considering. It's really mediocre plotting, really outstanding characters. Lesbian romance is so sparse and generally bad (like everything is bad, not specific to lesbian romance) that I hate to ding this. The main couple has sex reasonably early on--this is the worst offense I can think of in F/F romance; very long drawn-out will they or won't they that EVENTUALLY ends in them getting together. Navigating the creation of a relationship rather than resolving a tension is more interesting in any case.
M Brayden. You do good work. Just ask yourself "Could this literally ever happen to human beings in the 21st century?" (