Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.
Two writers and professors present 40 short pieces of fiction that serve as humorous counterfeit texts, including a personal ad from Ron Carlson, a parking department complaint from Amy Hempel, and a list of works cited from Rick Moody.
Grrr. This is the only book I brought with me today, for when I finished [b:Red Scarf Girl|413432|Red Scarf Girl|Ji-li Jiang|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1174522009s/413432.jpg|2411038]. Something light and amusing, I thought, for after the downer.
Well, it is light, in the sense that it is printed on really cheap paper, and thus, despite being a thick trade edition, it doesn't weigh much. And then after an introduction that explains how to make fakes (but not why to anthologize them), the very first entry is "Disclaimer" about an abused and murdered woman, which should not be confused with a real woman, even should there happen to be such a thing.
I just can't. I've read parts of everything up through #24. None so far are funny, none so far are remotely plausible as what they purport to be, but rather they are mostly excuses to mock the subjects or supposed authors.
Maybe I'm just letting the news of the world get me down, but the complete lack of empathy at the outset just makes everything else feel arch and shallow and annoying.
I wanted a whole lot more out of this book than I got. It really ought to be titled "Parodies," rather than "Fakes", since the vast majority of selections here read much in that vein than as actual faked texts. Also, I'm sad to say that quite a few of the pieces here just aren't very funny, which would have been just fine if it didn't seem like they were intended to be funny.
Probably safe to give this one a miss. The few really good pieces aren't worth the rest. ( )
In general, I enjoyed this. Nice, light - and for the most part - humorous reads, that you could either take a few at a time, or one if it was particularly long. Some were too long, or stretched out the concept beyond interestingness - such as "From Some instructions to My Wife Concerning the Upkeep of the House and Marriage..." and "The Varieties of Romantic Experience". I also felt that in some pieces there was a recurring theme of following a person's life story, including the ups and downs of their love lives, which could get repetitive. I personally liked "Officers Weep"; there were certainly other good pieces. And I appreciate the list at the end of further reading, definitely interested in looking up further "fakes". ( )
The book was OK. I may have expected more of it because of the great title and thus I was a little disappointed when I couldn't find much of what I was looking for. I did find a few surprises and certain artifacts of great interest to me in this book of fakes. But there were more than enough areas of disagreement regarding certain selections made by the editors. I elaborate in greater detail in an article I wrote here:
Two writers and professors present 40 short pieces of fiction that serve as humorous counterfeit texts, including a personal ad from Ron Carlson, a parking department complaint from Amy Hempel, and a list of works cited from Rick Moody.
)
)
)
Google Books — Cargando...
1
Well, it is light, in the sense that it is printed on really cheap paper, and thus, despite being a thick trade edition, it doesn't weigh much. And then after an introduction that explains how to make fakes (but not why to anthologize them), the very first entry is "Disclaimer" about an abused and murdered woman, which should not be confused with a real woman, even should there happen to be such a thing.
I just can't. I've read parts of everything up through #24. None so far are funny, none so far are remotely plausible as what they purport to be, but rather they are mostly excuses to mock the subjects or supposed authors.
Maybe I'm just letting the news of the world get me down, but the complete lack of empathy at the outset just makes everything else feel arch and shallow and annoying.
Library copy