This is a followup to Zuber's "Inventing the Schlieffen Plan (2003). Once again Zuber launches into a review and analysis of the German staff's war planning, war gaming and staff rides to prove that there never was a "Schlieffen Plan" as claimed by various sources. The Schlieffen Plan of course refers to the opening moves claimed to have been executed by the German Army in August, 1914. The goal being to circle Paris to the west and drive the French Army into Switzerland or envelop and destroy the army. By studying the archives of the German Army, Zuber believes there is no evidence that an S. Plan ever was studied, tested, or really proposed.

I cannot argue against his theory nor the result of his research. He looked in the records and documents, not me. His argument is convincing to my way of thinking. However, there are many vocal opponents to his views. At the end of the book, all I will say is that he names names, and calls out other historians for their theories and work. Given the data Zuber presents, I have to side with him in ths argument. I gave the book 4 stars since at times I found it difficult to follow all the data he presents. It is a fairly short book (187 pp including maps and notes) so it is a quick read.

I recommend this book as an interesting contra view on the long held acceptance of the Schllieffen Plan as the fool-proof way in which Germany intended to win the two-front war against France and Russia. ( )