PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

What We Talk About When We Talk About War

por Noah Richler

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
2221,024,995 (3)4
An Amazon.ca Editor's Pick for 2012 and a Globe and MailTop 100 Book of 2012 Shortlisted, Governor General's Award for Non-Fiction, Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing, and John W. Dafoe Book Prize Longlisted, Charles Taylor Prize for Literary Non-Fiction A provocative examination of how communications has shaped the language of the media, and vice versa, and how rhetoric shapes how Canadians thinks of themselves as a nation and Canada's engagement in peacekeeping, war, and on the international stage. According to Richler, each phase of engagement in Afghanistan has been shaped not only by rhetoric but an overarching narrative structure. This topic is very much in discussion at the moment. With the withdrawal of Canadian troops (at least in part) from Afghanistan, it becomes clear there had been a rhetorical cycle. Where once Canada wielded the myth of itself as a peacekeeping nation, the past decade has seen a marked shift away from this, emphasizing the Canadian soldier as warrior. Yet now, as the country withdraws, the oratorical language we use steps away from heroes, able warriors, and sacrifice and back towards a more comfortable vision of Canada in a peacekeeping/training role. In recent years, Canada has made large financial investments in the apparatus of war -- in a manner it hasn't in a very long time -- and as the realities of war are brought home (the losses, the tragedies, the atrocities, the lasting repercussions that come home with the soldiers who were on the front lines), Richler contends that it's crucial we understand our national perspective on war -- how we have framed it, how we continue to frame it. Using recent events to bolster his arguments, including the shooting of American congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the earthquake in Haiti, Richler argues that very possibly the epic narrative of Canada is winding back down to that of the novel as we slowly regain our peacekeeping agenda.… (más)
Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

» Ver también 4 menciones

Mostrando 2 de 2
An impolite, error-filled polemic that spews nonsense about serious subjects, few - if any - of which the author appears, even superficially, to comprehend. Too bad, as he had some fine straw-man-like material, including the deceitful, autocratic government of Stephen Harper, quite likely the only PM in Canadian history to have viscerally hated the very country he was leading. Instead, he pursues a windy, obtuse, forced comparison of epic vs novel as a narrative device, and cranks off inane suggestions near the end to close out his vacuous, idiotic argument. Garbage like this, with its pumped up assumptions about Canadian character (which, of course, only he understands), Canadian values (which, of course, are those only he and his ilk espouse), and the tawdriness of Canadian interests (which only he is guilelessly entitled to lampoon and dismiss), are what has led contemporary liberalism to such a sad, self-contradictory impasse: if only their opponents would succumb, if only the citizenry would stop being duped by avatars of militarism and greed, if only the press and police and big business and all levels of government etc etc would see the light. If not so deeply engrained on the Canadian left, if not so injurious to vision, compromise, and governance, it would simply be pathetic. Instead, it is positively dangerous, and a screaming example of the acidic foolishness that has paved the way for rightwing nut jobs to now appear as reasonable defenders of common sense. ( )
  threegirldad | Mar 4, 2020 |
Reviewed here.
  scott.neigh | Sep 20, 2013 |
Mostrando 2 de 2
Finalist, John W. Dafoe Book Prize

Finalist, Shaughnessey Cohen Prize for Political Writing

Finalist, Governor General's Award for Non-fiction

Longlisted for the Charles Taylor Prize for Literary Non-Fiction

Globe & Mail Top 100 Book of 2012

Editor's Pick for 2012, Amazon.ca

“I have to say that I was stunned by Richler's courage and insight: if he were our Prime Minister, there would never have been an Afghanistan!” — Stephen Lewis, former Canadian Ambassador to the UN

“You don’t have to agree with everything Noah Richler says — I don’t — but you must take him seriously.” — Margaret MacMillan, author of Paris 1919

“A tonic to the spirit, Richler’s book explores the rootedness of Canadian values and connects them to the experience of life in an enormous and damn lucky country.” — James Laxer, author of Tecumseh and Brock: The War of 1812

Did Lester B. Pearson get it wrong? The Liberal prime minister envisioned Canada as a nation of peacekeepers, and won the Nobel Prize for his vision. However, throughout the last decade, Canada’s identity crisis has deepened. The concept of the Canadian soldier as peacekeeper has been transformed into one of confident and able war-maker. We are told we are, and must be, a warrior nation. In What We Talk About When We Talk About War, Noah Richler examines the rhetoric of conflict, how story and information is used to convince a society to pursue a particular path, or not. This clear-eyed polemic looks at the narrative employed by politicians and the military and takes the media to task for our revised national mythology and re-interpretation of the events of past wars. Richler suggests that our changing narrative about war speaks volumes about our collective consciousness and how we have conceived and redefined ourselves as a nation as we talked ourselves into, through, and ultimately out of our participation in war.

Find Goose Lane eBooks at Kobo, Barnes & Noble, amazon and other eBook retailers.
 
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

An Amazon.ca Editor's Pick for 2012 and a Globe and MailTop 100 Book of 2012 Shortlisted, Governor General's Award for Non-Fiction, Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing, and John W. Dafoe Book Prize Longlisted, Charles Taylor Prize for Literary Non-Fiction A provocative examination of how communications has shaped the language of the media, and vice versa, and how rhetoric shapes how Canadians thinks of themselves as a nation and Canada's engagement in peacekeeping, war, and on the international stage. According to Richler, each phase of engagement in Afghanistan has been shaped not only by rhetoric but an overarching narrative structure. This topic is very much in discussion at the moment. With the withdrawal of Canadian troops (at least in part) from Afghanistan, it becomes clear there had been a rhetorical cycle. Where once Canada wielded the myth of itself as a peacekeeping nation, the past decade has seen a marked shift away from this, emphasizing the Canadian soldier as warrior. Yet now, as the country withdraws, the oratorical language we use steps away from heroes, able warriors, and sacrifice and back towards a more comfortable vision of Canada in a peacekeeping/training role. In recent years, Canada has made large financial investments in the apparatus of war -- in a manner it hasn't in a very long time -- and as the realities of war are brought home (the losses, the tragedies, the atrocities, the lasting repercussions that come home with the soldiers who were on the front lines), Richler contends that it's crucial we understand our national perspective on war -- how we have framed it, how we continue to frame it. Using recent events to bolster his arguments, including the shooting of American congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the earthquake in Haiti, Richler argues that very possibly the epic narrative of Canada is winding back down to that of the novel as we slowly regain our peacekeeping agenda.

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (3)
0.5
1 2
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5 2

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 206,447,395 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible