PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures (1985)

por Jürgen Habermas

Otros autores: Ver la sección otros autores.

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
594239,848 (4.04)4
The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity is a tour de force that has the immediacy and accessibility of the lecture form and the excitement of an encounter across, national cultural boundaries. Habermas takes up the challenge posed by the radical critique of reason in contemporary French poststructuralism. Tracing the odyssey of the philosophical discourse of modernity, Habermas's strategy is to return to those historical "crossroads" at which Hegel and the Young Hegelians, Nietzsche and Heidegger made the fateful decisions that led to this outcome. His aim is to identify and clearly mark out a road indicated but not taken: the determinate negation of subject-centered reason through the concept of communicative rationality. As The Theory of Communicative Action served to place this concept within the history of social theory, these lectures locate it within the history of philosophy. Habermas examines the odyssey of the philosophical discourse of modernity from Hegel through the present and tests his own ideas about the appropriate form of a postmodern discourse through dialogs with a broad range of past and present critics and theorists. The lectures on Georges Bataille, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Cornelius Castoriadis are of particular note since they are the first fruits of the recent cross-fertilization between French and German thought. Habermas's dialogue with Foucault - begun in person as the first of these lectures were delivered in Paris in 1983 culminates here in two appreciative yet intensely argumentative lectures. His discussion of the literary-theoretical reception of Derrida in America - launched at Cornell in 1984 - issues here in a long excursus on the genre distinction between philosophy and literature. The lectures were reworked for the final time in seminars at Boston College and first published in Germany in the fall of 1985. -- from http://mitpress.mit.edu (August 22, 2011).… (más)
Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

» Ver también 4 menciones

Mostrando 2 de 2
100 HAB 2
  luvucenanzo06 | Sep 7, 2023 |
Some incisive comments from Habermas:

Heidegger was limited by Husserl's phenomenological way of asking questions, a variant of Husserl, and insisted on Husserl's Intuitionism throughout his life. In a sense, it still adheres to the foundationalism of philosophy of consciousness. Heidegger confuses everyday life with art, rejects the question of science and experience, the uncertainty of his destiny with his blind obedience to something higher.

1. History of reason: the process of the formation of madness, and there is truth in madness. He later switched from hermeneutics to archaeology. "The subject, by turning everything around him into a subject, ultimately elevates himself to the universal reason of mankind." Monologue isolation. The humanities have also become intermediaries for disciplining forces; The subject-centered rationality gained the dominant position. Truth is a mechanism of exclusion.
2. Foucault's rules are insufficient to explain practice, and from episteme to power, knowledge-based dependence on power. Power comes from the philosophy of consciousness, which is only reversed and cannot get rid of the philosophy of the subject.

His own alternative path out of subject philosophy:

Communicative rationality and subject-centered rationality. The objective cognition paradigm of philosophy of consciousness should be replaced by the mutual understanding paradigm. The intersubjectivity of language establishment. The ontological distinction between a priori and experience disappears. Rational restructuring is aimed at the system of rules, not totality.
  Maristot | Aug 27, 2023 |
Mostrando 2 de 2
sin reseñas | añadir una reseña

» Añade otros autores (8 posibles)

Nombre del autorRolTipo de autor¿Obra?Estado
Jürgen Habermasautor principaltodas las edicionescalculado
Lawrence, Frederick G.Traductorautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
McCarthy, ThomasIntroducciónautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Información procedente del Conocimiento común alemán. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Für Rebekka,

die mir den Neostrukturalismus

nähergebracht hat
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico
The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity is a tour de force that has the immediacy and accessibility of the lecture form and the excitement of an encounter across, national cultural boundaries. Habermas takes up the challenge posed by the radical critique of reason in contemporary French poststructuralism. Tracing the odyssey of the philosophical discourse of modernity, Habermas's strategy is to return to those historical "crossroads" at which Hegel and the Young Hegelians, Nietzsche and Heidegger made the fateful decisions that led to this outcome. His aim is to identify and clearly mark out a road indicated but not taken: the determinate negation of subject-centered reason through the concept of communicative rationality. As The Theory of Communicative Action served to place this concept within the history of social theory, these lectures locate it within the history of philosophy. Habermas examines the odyssey of the philosophical discourse of modernity from Hegel through the present and tests his own ideas about the appropriate form of a postmodern discourse through dialogs with a broad range of past and present critics and theorists. The lectures on Georges Bataille, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Cornelius Castoriadis are of particular note since they are the first fruits of the recent cross-fertilization between French and German thought. Habermas's dialogue with Foucault - begun in person as the first of these lectures were delivered in Paris in 1983 culminates here in two appreciative yet intensely argumentative lectures. His discussion of the literary-theoretical reception of Derrida in America - launched at Cornell in 1984 - issues here in a long excursus on the genre distinction between philosophy and literature. The lectures were reworked for the final time in seminars at Boston College and first published in Germany in the fall of 1985. -- from http://mitpress.mit.edu (August 22, 2011).

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (4.04)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5
3 7
3.5 2
4 15
4.5 5
5 11

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 204,747,187 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible