PortadaGruposSe habla deMásVisión actual
Buscar En Este Sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, para análisis y (si no está registrado) para publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros Términos de Servicio y Política de Privacidad. Su uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.
Hide this

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.


El Apagón

por Connie Willis

Otros autores: Ver la sección otros autores.

Series: All Clear (1), Oxford Time Travel series (3)

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
2,7461933,882 (3.84)436
Willis imagina un futuro cercano en el sus personajes viajan al pasado para analizarlo. Estos personajes son investigadores de la Universidad de Oxford durante la segunda mitad del siglo XXI. en el año 2060 el protagonista, estudiante de historia, va ser
  1. 150
    Por no mencionar al perro por Connie Willis (pwaites)
  2. 60
    Fire Watch por Connie Willis (clee67)
  3. 30
    Farthing por Jo Walton (SusannainSC)
  4. 20
    22/11/63 por Stephen King (Navarone)
    Navarone: Both books are about time travel and how the future is affected due to the actions you make.
  5. 01
    The Little Book por Selden Edwards (becksdakex)
    becksdakex: Time travel, WWII, Change history?

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

No hay Conversaciones actualmente sobre este libro.

» Ver también 436 menciones

Inglés (190)  Alemán (2)  Polaco (1)  Todos los idiomas (193)
Mostrando 1-5 de 193 (siguiente | mostrar todos)
A time travel book, not dissimilar to Time and Again, with travellers constantly worried about changing the future. Really follows the tribulations of three travellers in war-torn London. Great portrayal of stoic British, during difficult period in their history. Read about book in NY Times Book Review, but did not realize there would be a sequel. ( )
  skipstern | Jul 11, 2021 |
I think Connie Willis is milking the concept of the Doomsday Book. The first volume was fresh, and introduced the idea of future historians using time travel to improve knowledge of the past. The book was innovative, engagingly written and quite funny.
Then came To Say Nothing of the Dog which continued the basic scenario, this time set in Victorian England, using Three Men in a Boat as theme and parallel. Less innovative than the first book in the series, the result was still very readable and quite funny.
Now in the third volume of this occasional series, the future historians have travelling back to England in the period of WW2. The hook in this volume is that something appears to have broken in the time travel process, and the three protagonists seem to be stranded in the past. I think, after 685 or so pages, I expected a little more plot development. There are plenty of interesting subsidiary characters, but the book drowns in too much detail, and not enough plot progress.
But, the author can write, and I have signed up for the next (final?) volume - All Clear, to find out what is wrong, and how it can be resolved. ( )
  mbmackay | Apr 17, 2021 |
Set in the same ‘verse as Doomsday Book and To say nothing of the dog this is a book about historians. But not the sort of historian you or I might be familiar with, but one who actually travels through time and investigates the past in person. Mr Dunworthy’s time travel department in Oxford is having a spot of bother. Schedules are being changed and moved about all other place. This does not please the historians, especially those like Michael who have just been implanted with American accents in preparation for heading to Pearl Harbour and are not, instead, heading to Dover. But they’ll still travel, because it is the only timetable open to them.

The story in Blackout is told from a variety of perspectives, all studying World War II. Polly is in London researching the blitz spirit. Eileen is in the countryside looking at the evacuee situation, and Mike should be studying the ordinary heroes of Dunkirk.

To be honest, at first I wasn’t really gripped by any of the storylines. But I gradually got hooked and in the end I did enjoy the book. Only of course it isn’t finished. This book was published in two volumes and so I must go look for All clear now and find out what has happened to everyone.

If you pay attention to my genre labels you’ll see that I’ve called this one sff & historical fiction. technically I suppose if should just be sff, but there is so much details about the lives of people during the war that I do think that historical fiction fans who like that period should give this a go. You can always put it down if you don’t like it.

As I said, I did *get* to like this book, and enjoy it, but at the same time I’m not sure quite why it won so many awards. It is good, but not great. Does that mean the competition wasn’t up to much? or is it just that part two will really wow me?

If you’ve read Connie Willis before then you’ll know the sort of book this is. If you haven’t, I’d recommend you start with Doomsday book as it is the first of her novels in this ‘verse. There is also a short story, Fire Watch, but I haven’t read that yet. You can jump straight into this one without reading the others, but it will help to introduce terms and concepts like slippage and drops and the like. ( )
  Fence | Jan 5, 2021 |
Yes, I absolutely devoured this book. I read it inside a 25-hour window of time. The first big chunk of that, I was sitting at the car dealership while my vehicle was serviced, and the television in the waiting area was blaring some vapid daytime tv talk show, but I was so enthralled with this book I barely noticed. I loved it. I would write a longer review, but honestly, I have to go right now and start the followup, All Clear. ( )
  sdramsey | Dec 14, 2020 |
Usually, on the occasions when I am underwhelmed by a book that has rave reviews and prestigious awards to its name, I find myself wishing I could see in it the things that others see. Usually, it's just a matter of taste, whether in style or subject matter or – increasingly – the penchant people have for having their half-baked socio-political opinions unquestioningly mirrored back at them. But in Connie Willis' Blackout, none of that was the case. Blackout wasn't a book that I didn't get; it was just legitimately, objectively poor.

It sounded so great, which was why I wanted to read it: an experienced sci-fi author writes a story about a group of Oxford historians in the year 2060 who regularly go back in time to observe first-hand the events of the past. I was immediately sold on the premise, and on the early chapters where various characters speculate on the possibilities of going back to observe Pearl Harbor, the Crusades or 9/11. Even though this was only background colour, Blackout's subsequent plotline of three such historians being trapped in wartime England in 1940 and unable to return seemed a compelling one.

Six hundred pages later and I am dispirited at how the book panned out. In retrospect, Blackout's problems are evident even in those early chapters: a lot of hustle and bustle, not knowing which characters we should be paying attention to, and with poor scene-setting and plot progression. The three main characters take a long time to emerge, not only because of the helter-skelter plotting but because there's so little to differentiate them as characters. Their inner monologues become repetitive, mostly concerned with managing their schedules: how they are going to hitch a ride, catch a train, run an errand on their lunch break, or get to such-and-such a place before the nightly air raid sirens. "Polly looked at her watch, trying to decide if she had enough time to get to Mrs Rickett's and back" (pg. 597). It is that sort of triviality which passes for the bulk of 'time travel' in Blackout.

The growing sketchiness of the book exacerbates other minor irritants. Strange grammar choices like "the water'd risen" (pg. 130) or "Merope'd gone" (pg. 499) repel with their clumsiness. Anachronisms can be forgiven, but when a time-travelling Oxford historian researching the Blitz doesn't know what an Anderson shelter is, because she was there to study evacuees in the countryside and "hadn't researched shelters" (pg. 405), you have to ask: where in the hell had this historian built up her working knowledge of the Blitz, that she'd never heard of a bloody Anderson shelter?

The greatest irritants, however, are the constant plot teases and misdirects. The book should be called Fake-Out rather than Blackout: Willis often writes a chapter in which it seems a certain character is dead, or late, or something contrary has happened, only to write a few chapters later, when we have returned to this character, that it was a simple misunderstanding or, more commonly, a deliberately contrived circumstance to titillate the reader. For example, one character, fearing that he has broken the timeline and lost Britain the war, ends one chapter with a man telling him "the Germans are coming!", only for it to emerge in his next PoV chapter that the man is a mental patient. Every reader will quickly cotton on to this trick, which is repeated over and over again throughout the book: the most egregious is the chapter where the department store where one character works is said to have been bombed, and in a few paragraphs we flip-flop between revelations that it has been bombed or left unscathed (which would have implications that they have altered the timeline). When it turns out to have been a non-issue, much is made of the many bodies outside the bomb site (where in the original timeline there were only three), only for it to emerge in the next chapter that the 'bodies' are shop mannequins. The reader begins to feel insulted.

Though not a terrible book – Willis' writing is easy enough, if mediocre, and her concept is interesting – it is this sort of fake-out that destroys the reader's goodwill. And after 600 pages, the book ends on a cliff-hanger without any sort of pace or drama: it is painfully clear that Blackout and its follow-up, All Clear, were a single manuscript cleaved into two. And it's hard to see why: much of Blackout is contrived fakery and padding and could have been discarded. The reader realises the characters' predicament – "we can't use any of our drops" (pg. 562) – many hundreds of pages before the characters do, and we follow them interminably towards this understanding. I can see myself reading All Clear at some point, just to finish the story, but, damningly, this is largely out of a sense of obligation and without any of the excitement with which I first opened Blackout. Perhaps the story will redeem itself in the end, but Blackout cannot stand by itself on merit. ( )
4 vota MikeFutcher | Aug 12, 2020 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 193 (siguiente | mostrar todos)
Science fiction and the historical novel only seem to be utter opposites. I mean, future vs. past, right? In fact, the two genres are closely related. Both transport the reader to strange, disorienting worlds, where the people, beliefs and social norms are often distinctly alien to a present-day sensibility.

In certain kinds of time-travel stories, it's often difficult to tell the two genres apart. Is "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" historical fiction or proto science fiction? Certainly, Connie Willis's new novel, her first since "Passage" (2001), about near-death experiences, is as vivid an evocation of England during World War II as anyone has ever written. It's also indisputably science fiction. . . .

If you're a science-fiction fan, you'll want to read this book by one of the most honored writers in the field (10 Hugos, six Nebulas); if you're interested in World War II, you should pick up "Blackout" for its you-are-there authenticity; and if you just like to read, you'll find here a novelist who can plot like Agatha Christie and whose books possess a bounce and stylishness that Preston Sturges might envy.

That said, "Blackout" does end with a cliffhanger, which may leave some readers dissatisfied: The whole story won't be completely resolved till October when Ballantine/Spectra publishes a second and concluding volume titled "All-Clear." Still, this is Connie Willis, my friends, which means she's worth reading now, and she's worth reading in the future.
añadido por PLReader | editarWashington Post, Michael Dirda (Mar 11, 2010)
What she's also able to do is to play her reader like a newly tuned piano. Scenes that could be milked for every last mawkish drop somehow get around your defenses and wring out your heart.
añadido por Jannes | editarLocus Magazone, Adrienne Martini (Feb 16, 2010)

» Añade otros autores (1 posible)

Nombre del autorRolTipo de autor¿Trabajo?Estado
Connie Willisautor principaltodas las edicionescalculado
Brock, ChalresArtista de la Cubiertaautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Kellgren, KatherineNarradorautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Kennedy, SteveText Designerautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Omori, N.Traductorautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Potter, J.K.Artista de la Cubiertaautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Vicens, PaulaTraductorautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Wintrebert, JoëlleTraductorautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Lugares importantes
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Eventos importantes
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Películas relacionadas
Premios y honores
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
History is now and England. - T.S. Eliot, Four Quartets
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
To Courtney and Cordelia, who always do far more than their bit.
Primeras palabras
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Colin tried the door, but it was locked.
Últimas palabras
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Aviso de desambigüedad
Idioma original
Información del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
DDC/MDS Canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés (2)

Willis imagina un futuro cercano en el sus personajes viajan al pasado para analizarlo. Estos personajes son investigadores de la Universidad de Oxford durante la segunda mitad del siglo XXI. en el año 2060 el protagonista, estudiante de historia, va ser

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Enlaces rápidos

Cubiertas populares


Promedio: (3.84)
1 22
1.5 5
2 47
2.5 11
3 150
3.5 66
4 349
4.5 54
5 197

¿Este eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.


Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas de Figuras Notables | Primeros Reseñadores | Conocimiento Común | 160,620,745 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible