Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Doctor Who and the Doomsday Weaponpor Malcolm Hulke
Books Read in 2020 (2,903) Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. http://nhw.livejournal.com/1033342.html?#cutid4 This was one of those books which, on rereading, failed to live up to my fond childhood memories. Hulke irritatingly switches between writing down for a younger audience and meandering into heavy-handed political parable. For whatever reason, it is written as if it were Jo Grant's first story; and the introduction is much more clumsily handled than in Doctor Who and the Terror of the Autons. The back-story of the human colonists is ripped off unimaginatively from dozens of better sf books about future dystopias. And the whole plot basically makes no sense. The least good of the Hulke books so far. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Pertenece a las seriesDoctor Who {non-TV} (Novelisation) Contenido enEs una adaptación de
The evil Master has stolen the Time Lord's file on the horrifying Doomsday Weapon, with which he will blast whole planets out of existence and make himself ruler of the Galaxy! The Time Lords direct Doctor Who and Jo Grant to a bleak planet in the year 2471, where they find colonists from Earth under threat from mysterious, savage, monster lizards with frightful claws! Hidden upon the planet is the Doomsday Weapon, for which the Master is intently searching. Geoffrey Beevers, who played an incarnation of the Master in the classic BBC Doctor Who TV series, reads Malcolm Hulke's complete and unabridged novelization. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999Clasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
This could use a serious continuity edit. Or maybe a decision on the part of the author as to who he was writing for. Because it switches kind of abruptly from lighthearted adventure in space to political philosophy, and I liked the space adventure a lot more. Because as a dystopia, it was not that awesome.
Also when I can mentally replace Three with Ten and Roger Delgado with John Simm, albeit with a few mental gymnastics, your characterization might be a little thin. Although I will admit that it probably speaks more to the fashion in which the Doctor is an archetype than it demonstrates the author's inability to create a three-dimensional character. ( )