PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

Don't Look at Me Like That (1967)

por Diana Athill

Otros autores: Ver la sección otros autores.

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
1074252,740 (3.72)4
"In England half a century ago, well-brought-up young women are meant to aspire to the respectable life. Some things are not to be spoken of; some are most certainly not to be done. There are rules, conventions. Meg Bailey obeys them. She progresses fromHome Counties school to un-Bohemian art college with few outward signs of passion or frustration. Her personality is submerged in polite routines; even with her best friend, Roxane, what can't be said looms far larger than what can. But circumstances change. Meg gets a job and moves to London. Roxane gets married to a man picked out by her mother. And then Meg does something shocking - shocking not only by the standards of her time, but by our own. As sharp and as startling now as when it was written, Don't Look At Me Like That matches Diana Athill's memoirs After a Funeral and Instead of a Letter in its gift for storytelling and its unflinching candour about love and betrayal"--… (más)
Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

» Ver también 4 menciones

Mostrando 4 de 4
Not a favorite. Good storyteller, well drawn characters, but a bit dark for my taste. I was quite startled at the ending. I was cruising right along seeing a possibility for light at the end of the tunnel, and snap it was over. I guess this is where I let my imagination decide how things work out. I received an advance readers copy of this from the publisher and EdelweissPlus. I ordered a copy from the library thinking something was missing in my edition, but no that's that! ( )
  njcur | Nov 25, 2023 |
What a horrible little book! Barely a novel at all, more a novella to be read in one sitting, but Meg the narrator was so snotty that I kept having to stop and start just to get through and get rid. Like Valley of the Dolls and The Best of Everything, the attitude of women in the 1950s and 1960s seems pathetic to 21st century readers (well, me, anyway), even when they're pretending to be modern and independent like Meg.

Meg Bailey is an insufferable prude from the Home Counties who bemoans everything in her life, from her 'embarrassing' parents to how men just can't help falling for her beauty. She moves to London, naturally, to become an illustrator, shacking up in the bedroom of a single mum and her other lodgers, and starts an affair with the husband of her childhood best friend, Roxanne. Oh yes, Meg moans about Roxanne and her glamorous mother, too. But having an affair with a married man isn't wrong when Meg is the one getting what she wants, of course, and anyone who says otherwise is just bitter. Seriously. And then the obvious happens and Meg finds out she is pregnant just after her lover leaves for America with his wife and kids, and despite not really liking children or being at all maternal, Meg decides to keep her (illegitimate) baby because 'it will love me' - or as one honest character tells her, 'You're one of those women who don't want a child at all, they want a magic mirror'.

'I had learnt that the man was not worth loving and it hadn't stopped me loving him. I knew that other men could love me and I didn't care. I had betrayed Roxanne and she didn't know it. I had shocked and wounded my parents and we no longer admitted it.'

What a hateful, prejudiced, obnoxious, arrogant, stuck-up, self-serving, cock-teasing bitch! I'm glad this was such a short book, and from the library, because I had the strongest urge to throw my copy in the bin. Are we supposed to cheer Meg on for taking control of her life while ruining other people's, or find her slightly hysterical and unpleasant? I'm not entirely sure. Clever writing and astute observations, but if you read for the characters like I do, Meg will make you retch. I remember reading and enjoying Diana Athill's memoirs about the publishing industry, Stet, but hated this fictional outing with a passion. I'm glad she stopped there. ( )
  AdonisGuilfoyle | Feb 29, 2020 |
This extremely introspective novel of a girl's growth into womanhood in 1950's London was rather a bore. The narrator, Meg, examines every situation she's in and every feeling she has about it to an incredible degree. This might be less jarring if told from a third person omniscient narrator, but in first person it becomes almost unbearable in its intense naval-gazing. Also, I find I don't really like her that much. Her story is supposed to be rather shocking and racy for the time and place it was written, but I found it both predictable and rather distasteful. Another character refers to Meg as a "cock-teasing bitch" and although she prefers to ascribe the comment to the speaker's own sadness and bitterness, I can't disagree with her. My personal philosophy is to live life having as much fun as possible without hurting anyone. Meg seems to live as miserably as possible, "unintentionally" hurting many people, and always being concerned with how she appears to an unseen outside non-existent observer. Since I as the reader am just such an observer, I'd advise her to stop being such a whiny bitch and grow up. She is the kind of woman who gives the rest of us a crazy, neurotic, hysterical bad name. ( )
2 vota EmScape | Aug 1, 2010 |
This is beautifully written, like all Diana Athill's books. The development of Meg's rebellions, from her disregard for school rules through to the ultimate rejection of her society's mores when she decides to keep her child, is well crafted and convincing. The blend of contemporary Meg, commenting on her past actions, and Meg as a youth is skillfully achieved; I never felt that youthful Meg had too much self-awareness, because I was always aware of when the narrative spoke through her older, more reflective voice. ( )
  catalpa | Feb 11, 2008 |
Mostrando 4 de 4
sin reseñas | añadir una reseña

» Añade otros autores

Nombre del autorRolTipo de autor¿Obra?Estado
Diana Athillautor principaltodas las edicionescalculado
Bird, LukeDiseñador de cubiertaautor secundarioalgunas edicionesconfirmado

Pertenece a las series editoriales

Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
When I was at school I used to think that everyone disliked me, and it wasn't far from true.
If, for just a moment, we view the story of literature as an epic adventure in which a band of fortune hunters with widely varying sets of skills accepts the challenge of accessing reality and bringing accurate descriptions of it back across a bridge made of words, we might assign Diana Athill the role of the group shape-shifter. (Afterword)
Citas
Últimas palabras
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
(Haz clic para mostrar. Atención: puede contener spoilers.)
(Haz clic para mostrar. Atención: puede contener spoilers.)
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Idioma original
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés (1)

"In England half a century ago, well-brought-up young women are meant to aspire to the respectable life. Some things are not to be spoken of; some are most certainly not to be done. There are rules, conventions. Meg Bailey obeys them. She progresses fromHome Counties school to un-Bohemian art college with few outward signs of passion or frustration. Her personality is submerged in polite routines; even with her best friend, Roxane, what can't be said looms far larger than what can. But circumstances change. Meg gets a job and moves to London. Roxane gets married to a man picked out by her mother. And then Meg does something shocking - shocking not only by the standards of her time, but by our own. As sharp and as startling now as when it was written, Don't Look At Me Like That matches Diana Athill's memoirs After a Funeral and Instead of a Letter in its gift for storytelling and its unflinching candour about love and betrayal"--

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (3.72)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 2
3.5 4
4 7
4.5 1
5 1

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 203,213,904 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible