Started reading but could not understand or follow along so did not complete. Therefore will not give rating.

I had formed a favorable interest in author Madison Smartt Bell on the basis of his novel Doctor Sleep, so when I stumbled across a bargain used copy of Master of the Crossroads, I picked it up, only to discover it was the second of a series of three novels. Then, in a squall of objective chance, I happened upon a used copy of this, the first one, just a few days later in a different location.

All Souls' Rising could hardly be more different than Doctor Sleep in scope, scale, setting, and subject. The artistry of the writer is, however, in similar evidence. The subject is the Haitian Revolution, and it makes for a very grisly story. Bell does not flinch from descriptions of atrocities and their traumatic effects. But he also leavens the tale with moments of beauty.

There are multiple central characters, with some being historical figures, most notably Toussaint Louverture, who would become (however briefly) the first black ruler of Haiti. The two characters who serve as the real eyes of the reader, however, are the middle-aged Doctor Hébert, just arrived from France on family business, and Riau, a black originally enslaved in Africa. Although Hébert's tale serves to open and conclude the novel, Riau's story is given in the first person, and provides a key counterpoint. There are some powerfully-drawn women characters as well: Nanon, Isabelle Cigny, and Madame Arnaud, among others.

The settings vary among plantation, town, and wilderness. Bell observes the manifold conflicts within the colonial society, and their political consequences. He also remarks religion; both the French Catholicism of the colons and the vodoun of the blacks are shown as capable of good and ill alike.

Bell also furnishes an apparatus to help the reader with context, and to discriminate the established facts from his fictional interpolations. There are a wide-angle expository preface and an appendix affording a "Chronology of Historical Events." In addition, a glossary supplies meanings for scores of French and Creole terms used in the book. (Brief phrases of French go untranslated in the story's dialogue, although more substantial statements get Englished in footnotes.)

Although harrowing at times, this novel was an ultimately satisfying adventure delivering a humane perspective on a tumultuous episode of modern history.

Anyone who reads my blog (plug), will know - from looking at the Goodreads 'Currently Reading' widget there, that it's taken a long time to struggle through this one. A very long time. A very, very long time. You get the picture.

I fully accept it could be me that found this to be a long-winded way of saying very little. I don't know. It's either a polished turd, or a searing condemnation of…something or other. To be honest, I'm too bored to worry about worrying about what on earth he was trying to do with this one.

It's about the only successful slave rebellion ever. Which took place in Haiti (the French colony of Saint-Dominge, as it was) in 1791 - 1804. This book, I think, is set at the start, in 1791. Basically, we follow the progress of a French Doctor, through the French, the Haitian side of the island, before during and after the Slaves' uprising.

It's written, I think, in a style he feels is appropriate for the era (I'm guessing it's a man. You never know with a name like Madison). So a kind of Jane Austin-style, if she was writing about people being skinned alive. Well, I'm sorry, but some of the descriptions of what went on, are unnecessarily gruesome. Absolutely unnecessarily graphic and downright disturbingly horrible. I've yet to find out if these sorts of things actually went on and the descriptions are based on fact or not. And I'm not going to. But, they did absolutely nothing to advance the cause of the novel. It descended in parts, into the worst sort of gratuitous slasher, cheap horror-movie blood bath. Horror for horror's sake with an attempt to dress it up in the tattered trappings of a serious work. Yes, I can understand that the slaves were highly likely to exact their revenge on their ex-masters and you could hardly blame them for doing what they did. But stretching it out, time and time again, page after page is just badly done. And then, if this stuff isn't based on actual incidents, on hard documented fact, and he's making all this up - then you're one very sick man, Mr Bell. Or Ms Bell.

I came very, very close to knocking it on the head. Many, many times.

I know it's always easier to be negative that positive, but I really am struggling to find anything positive to say about this one. Oh yeah, I got it free. Phew!

That's it. If you're in the market for this sort of thing, you're probably going to appreciate it a lot more than I did. To be honest, I found the historical time-line at the back more interesting and readable than what preceded it. Probably, the Wikipedia page on the up-rising would read better. ( )

http://moloch981.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/quando-le-anime-si-sollevano/ ( )

One of the best historical novels I’ve ever read. It’s about the Haitian Revolution—this is the first volume. There are multiple points of view among the white and black people of Haiti. A French doctor comes to Haiti to visit a sister who’s married a Haitian planter and about whom he’s concerned. Dr. Hébert, who becomes involved with a mulatto woman and has a child with her, who’s captured by the rebels and learns about medicinal herbs from Toussaint L’Overature, is the “touchstone” character, the one whose sensibilities are most like those of today’s readers. It was a brilliant decision on Bell’s part to have a white man who was not a Haitian colonial (with economic interests in plantations and slave labor) as an observer/participant, one who is of the same class as the planters (without their interests) but is able to accept human beings on their own merits. I understand he continues through the next two volumes of the trilogy. There is also third person narration that focuses on different characters, increasing Toussaint who was already old by Haitian slave standards, a Christian, and from a well-run plantation where slaves were not grossly mistreated. There’s some first person narrative by an African named Riau who remembers his homeland (Toussaint was born into slavery in Haiti) and who moves between Toussaint’s group and some more militant and violent groups. The first person narrative is Bell’s attempt, largely successful, to “get inside the head” of the rebels, in the form of an individual who’s intelligent enough to have some insight into the choices the rebels have. Bell provides ample historical material for the reader to understand the context of the only successful black revolution. It takes place during the unsettled period following the French Revolution. There exist in Haiti at the time not only the same groups of whites there were in the US during slavery (the upper class, who owned land and for whom the institution of slavery is critical and the middle class whites who were traders and shopkeepers and had other jobs and professions and whose wealth did not derive from the land), but political groups as well, those conservatives who supported the king (largely the plantation-owning class) as well as various revolutionary supporters. So to some extent French politics played out in Haiti. There was one governing official who deported those Frenchmen who disagreed with him back to France as traitors, and in some cases to the guillotine. There were also black rebels who were loyal to the king.There’s a year-by-year summary of historical events in an appendix—needed since most readers in English are not very familiar with Haitian history. There’s also an excellent glossary that allows Bell to use French and Creole words in the text because all of them are explained in the glossary. That allows him to initiate the reader into the Voodoo religion and Haitian traditions among whites, Creoles, mulattoes and blacks) as it touches on the events in the novel. It’s extraordinary how successful he is leading readers to understand the multiple points of view. Neither side is monolithic in its interests and values and both the rebels and the white defenders are complicated and changing coalitions of individuals and groups with various motivations. Bell’s narrative also moves back and forth in time, with the novel actually beginning as Toussaint is moved to a secure prison in France in 1802. The events, though, of this first volume mainly take place between 1791 and 1793.I already have the second volume… ( )