PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human

por Siddhartha Mukherjee

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
7252231,262 (4.02)25
En un relato a la vez li?rico y amplio, Mukherjee nos lleva a trave?s de una historia de la comprensio?n humana: desde el descubrimiento en el siglo XVII de que estamos formados por ce?lulas hasta la actual tecnologi?a de vanguardia para manipular y desplegar ce?lulas con fines terape?uticos". The New Yorker Tras los e?xitos de El emperador de todos los males y El gen, Siddhartha Mukherjee se adentra en la increi?ble y apasionante historia de la ce?lula. Bienvenidos a la apasionante historia de la ce?lula. En este nuevo libro, el onco?logo y divulgador Siddhartha Mukherjee nos acompan?a en un viaje fascinante a partir de uno de los mayores descubrimientos cienti?ficos de la historia: el hecho de que todos los organismos vivos complejos este?n constituidos por unidades diminutas, auto?nomas y autorreguladas, esas que en el siglo XVII Robert Hooke vio a trave?s de su microscopio y bautizo? con el nombre que hoy conocemos. Aquel hallazgo, seguido de una cada vez mejor comprensio?n de la fisiologi?a celular cambio? para siempre (y au?n determina) la manera en que abordamos la medicina, la ciencia, la biologi?a, las estructuras sociales y hasta la cultura. Una fractura de cadera, una parada cardiaca, el Alzheimer, el sida, un ca?ncer de pulmo?n... todo, absolutamente todo, puede explicarse como el resultado del funcionamiento ano?malo de las ce?lulas o de los ecosistemas que estas forman. Y tambie?n todo deberi?a poder tratarse mediante su manipulacio?n terape?utica. Esta revolucio?n en el campo de la biologi?a celular ya ha demostrado resultados transformadores y hoy se plantea como uno de los avances cienti?ficos que ma?s vidas pueden salvar.… (más)
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

» Ver también 25 menciones

Mostrando 1-5 de 21 (siguiente | mostrar todos)
Dudes. Have you ever thought about the fact that you are made entirely of cells? And somehow they coordinate their individual activities so you can grow, heal, think, live, and die? Holy shit! In this very readable and fascinating book, Mukherjee weaves together basic cell biology, the history of how we learned what we know so far about cells, his own experience as an oncologist and researcher, and his own personal life experiences. Somehow he keeps all the threads in order and after finishing this book, the reader has a pretty well-rounded understanding of what is going on with our crazy cells, what we still don't understand, and the many people who got us to this point. As a cancer person, this really helped me understand my own treatment (I finally get exactly what it is that neutrophils do and how the CDK4/6 inhibitors I took in my first and second lines of treatment really work!). Even non-cancer people can prepare to have their minds blown. Do you understand diabetes? The immune system? How a sperm and egg turn into a person? Maybe you think you do, but I bet you will learn a few things if you dig into this book. I read Mukherjee's Pulitzer-prize winning history of cancer, The Emperor of All Maladies, and really liked it but found his prose sometimes a bit too flowery for my taste. In The Song of the Cell, he keeps the same novelistic writing style, but (for the most part) reins in the overly florid metaphors. This book was just great. Highly recommended. ( )
  kristykay22 | Apr 11, 2024 |
Mukherjee’s books are always a pleasure. Learning about everything, from the experiments that were done to determine the functions of the various organelles of the cell ,to the creation of genetically modified human embryos turned out to be really entertaining. Love the Hindi stories that are skillfully woven in as well ( )
  cspiwak | Mar 6, 2024 |
A nice summary of the history cell research and introduction to the work being done in today's cell biology laboratories. ( )
  podocyte | Feb 10, 2024 |
I really enjoy this author's works, but sometimes wish he'd spend a bit more time explaining concepts and a bit less time exploding with flowery prose. ( )
  lemontwist | Nov 19, 2023 |
The information in this book was really interesting and well presented. However it is information dense and I would recommend reading it slowly, not only to take it in, but to prevent yourself from getting burned out by it. I was reading it on a deadline and pushed through it which left me feeling a bit overwhelmed with the material at times. It is very readable and easy to understand so don't be put off by the science. Just take your time with it. ( )
  Iudita | Aug 19, 2023 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 21 (siguiente | mostrar todos)
The rise of the ‘new human’ – how stem cells are revolutionising medicine.

Siddhartha Mukherjee's brilliant The Song of The Cell explains how these building blocks will upend our understanding of life itself.
very cell in your body, from toenail to brain, comes from a single original cell: the fertilized egg that was you at conception. So every different organ and tissue in the human body can in principle be produced by an embryonic cell, or stem cell. That being the case, why don’t we grow new limbs after injury, like salamanders and starfish do? Alas, our cells don’t always do what we’d wish. At least, not yet.

The prospect of the kind of “cellular engineering” that might make such therapies possible is one among many themes of The Song of The Cell, whose author, the oncologist Siddhartha Mukherjee, previously wrote the bestselling The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer (2010). Cancer itself is a recurring thread here too, being another way in which our cells can rebel against our hopes and desires. (There are some particularly moving scenes at the bedside of a friend and patient of the author’s.) What can make the disease so intractable, he explains, is that a single tumour can contain cells that have mutated in different ways, so that it is “an assemblage of nonidentical diseases”. So even novel therapies that sequence a tumour’s genome are not guaranteed to succeed.

No one knows how the planet’s first biological cell – the shared ancestor of all living things, from magic mushrooms to Liz Truss – constructed itself, billions of years ago. But somehow a bunch of proto-genetic material surrounded itself with a protective bubble and life got going. Later, single cells decided it might be worth getting together – perhaps huddling for defence, though again no one really knows – and so multicellular organisms such as shrubs and lizards were eventually made possible. As Mukherjee explains, cells have evolved into exquisite nanobots, packed with all sorts of machinery for energy production, replication, and – in the case of immune cells – hunting and killing.

Immunotherapy – the re-education of a patient’s own immune cells, the better to target cancer or other disease – is one of the cutting-edge medical interventions that really interest Mukherjee, and he relates some fascinating case studies of how it can work or fail. The problem is often that the supercharged immune cells go after other innocent organs (say, the liver) as well as the enemy. In a short but excellent chapter on the covid-19 pandemic, meanwhile, Mukherjee explains the especially vicious cellular effects of the Sars-Cov-2 virus’s hijacking and subverting of the immune system itself. Still it isn’t known how exactly this is done. “The monotony of answers is humbling, maddening,” the author writes. “We don’t know. We don’t know. We don’t know.”

What we do know, however, is already impressive. The fact that living tissues are made from cells was first discovered only in the late 17th century, by microscope-building investigators such as Robert Hooke and the Dutch cloth merchant Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. (Hooke called them “cells” because their structure reminded him of monks’ rooms.) Two hundred years later, it was still common for surgeons who dropped a scalpel on a blood-and-pus-soaked floor simply to wipe it off on their gowns for reuse. (Pus was thought to have splendid healing powers.) And now, a mere 150 years later, we can rewrite the DNA inside cells to cure some kinds of vision or hearing loss.
By engaging in such medical magic, Mukherjee argues that we are in a sense creating “new humans”, which might be thought a slight overstatement, but one cannot begrudge him his delight in his chosen science. Indeed, the subject of the cell is so vast in his hands – covering not only the anatomy of single cells, but also everything from IVF and heart attacks to battlefield medicine, deep-brain stimulation for depression, the Thalidomide disaster, the discovery of insulin, and gene-edited babies – that he has effectively attempted to write a book about the entirety of human biology and modern medicine. The guiding metaphor of “new humans”, as we allegedly shall be once immunological and genetic engineering becomes routine, is therefore structurally useful if not altogether convincing.

It is fortunate, then, that Mukherjee he is such an engaging writer, alert to both nanoscopic beauty and the potential deceptions of metaphor. After a particularly gruelling hospital episode, he comments: “Ever since that evening, I never use the word ‘bloodbath’ casually.” The most immediate parts of the book, indeed, are the periodic case studies from the author’s clinical practice, written with compassionate warmth and humour, and the personal glimpses into an ordinary scientific life and the dedication that goes with it. At one lovely point, he relates how he spends Monday mornings alone in a darkened room at his hospital, looking at blood samples under a microscope. It’s his favourite time of day. “I love looking at cells, in the way a gardener loves looking at plants.”

He also has an amusing habit of describing British places (Oxford, Oldham) as interminably rainy or foggy purgatories in which scientists must nonetheless doggedly pursue the truth, with wry asides at “the English habit of deadly euphemism” he encountered as a student. One scientific mentor, he relates, had a habit of reacting to an idea he thought ludicrous by calling it “subtle”. Mukherjee remembers: “At lab meetings, I must confess, I was often rather subtle.” In a more flattering sense of that term, he still is.
añadido por AntonioGallo | editarThe Telegraph
 
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
In the sum of the parts, there are only the parts. The world must be measured by eye. - Wallace Stevens
[Life] is a continuing rhythmic movement, of the pulse, of the gait, even of the cells. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Dedicatoria
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
To W.K. and E.W. - among the first to cross
Primeras palabras
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
(Prelude) The conversation took place over dinner in October 1837.
Introduction) In November 2017, I watched my friend Sam P. die because his cells had rebelled against his body.
Both of us, you and I, began as single cells.
Citas
Información procedente del Conocimiento común italiano. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
"On August 6, 1945, at about eight fifteen in the morning, thirty-one ­thousand feet above the Japanese city of Hiroshima, an atomic bomb nick­named Little Boy was dropped from an American military aircraft, a B-29 bomber nicknamed the Enola Gay. The bomb took about forty-five seconds to descend, and then detonated in midair, nineteen hundred feet above the Shima Surgical Hospital, where nurses and doctors were at work, and pa­tients still in their beds. It released about the energetic equivalent of fifteen kilotons of TNT -- about thirty-five thousand car bombs going off at once. A circle of fire, more than four miles in radius, spread out from the epicenter, destroying everything in its wake. The tar on the streets boiled. Glass flowed like liquid. Houses were flicked into oblivion, as if by a giant, incinerating hand. Outside the stone steps of Sumitomo bank, a man or woman who was vaporized instantly left a shadow of herself on the stone that had been blistered white by the conflagration.

"The waves of death that followed had three crests. About seventy thousand to eighty thousand people -- nearly 30 percent of the city's population -- were broiled to death almost instantly. 'I was trying to describe the mushroom [cloud], this turbulent mass,' one of the tail gunners of the aircraft wrote: 'I saw fires springing up in different places, like flames shooting up on a bed of coals [ ... ] it looked like lava or molasses covering the whole city, and it seemed to flow outward into the foothills where the little valleys would come into the plain, with fires starting up all over.'

"Then came a second wave -- from radiation sickness (or 'atomic bomb sickness' as it was initially called). As the psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton said, 'Survivors began to notice in themselves a strange form of illness. It consisted of nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite; diarrhea with amounts of blood in the stools; fever and weakness; purple spots on various parts of body from bleeding into the skin ... inflammation and ulceration of the mouth, throat, and gums.'

"But there was yet a third wave of devastation to come. Survivors who received the lowest doses of radiation began to develop bone marrow failure, resulting in chronic anemias. Their white cell counts sputtered, then declined and collapsed over a few months. As the scientists Irving Weiss­man and Judith Shizuru put it, 'those who died from the lowest lethal dose irradiation almost certainly died of hematopoietic [blood production] failure.' It wasn't the acute death of blood cells that killed these survivors. It was the inability to sustain the constant replenishment of blood; a collapse homeostasis of blood. The balance between regeneration and death had tipped. To paraphrase Bob Dylan: the cells not busy being born were dying.

"Macabre as it was, the bombing of Hiroshima provided proof that the human body possesses cells that continuously generate blood, not just in the moment, but for prolonged periods of time, through adulthood. If these cells are killed -- as they were in Hiroshima -- the entire blood system would eventually falter, unable to balance the rate of natural decay with the rate of rejuvenation. In time, these cells, capable of rejuvenating blood, would be termed 'blood-forming' -- or 'hematopoietic' -- 'stem and progenitor cells.'

"Our understanding of stem cells was born of a paradox: an unfathomably violent attack in an attempt to restore peace at the end of an unfathomably violent war. But stem cells are themselves a biological paradox. Their two principal functions seem, at face value, to be precisely opposed to each other. On one hand, a stem cell must generate functional 'differentiated' cells; a blood stem cell, for instance, must divide to give rise to the cells that form the mature elements of blood-white cells, red cells, platelets. But on the other hand, it must also divide to replenish itself -- i.e., a stem cell. If a stem cell achieved only the former function -- differentiation into mature, functional cells-the reservoir of replenishment would eventually be ex­hausted. Over the course of adulthood, our blood counts would keep falling year after year, until there were none left. In contrast, if it only achieved its own replenishment -- a phenomenon termed 'self-renewal' -- there would be no production of blood.

"It is the acrobatic balance between self-preservation and selflessness­ -- self-renewal and differentiation -- that makes the stem cell indispensable for an organism, and thereby enables the homeostasis of tissues such as blood. Cynthia Ozick, the essayist, once wrote that the ancients believed that the moist track of slime left behind by a snail in its trail was part of the snail's self. Bit by bit, as the slime rubs off, the snail is depleted, until the organism disappears altogether. A stem cell (or in the snail's case, a slime-producing cell) is a mechanism to ensure that the moist track of slime -- i.e., new cells -- are generated constantly and that the snail does not rub itself into oblivion."
Últimas palabras
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
(Haz clic para mostrar. Atención: puede contener spoilers.)
(Haz clic para mostrar. Atención: puede contener spoilers.)
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
Idioma original
Información procedente del conocimiento común inglés. Edita para encontrar en tu idioma.
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

En un relato a la vez li?rico y amplio, Mukherjee nos lleva a trave?s de una historia de la comprensio?n humana: desde el descubrimiento en el siglo XVII de que estamos formados por ce?lulas hasta la actual tecnologi?a de vanguardia para manipular y desplegar ce?lulas con fines terape?uticos". The New Yorker Tras los e?xitos de El emperador de todos los males y El gen, Siddhartha Mukherjee se adentra en la increi?ble y apasionante historia de la ce?lula. Bienvenidos a la apasionante historia de la ce?lula. En este nuevo libro, el onco?logo y divulgador Siddhartha Mukherjee nos acompan?a en un viaje fascinante a partir de uno de los mayores descubrimientos cienti?ficos de la historia: el hecho de que todos los organismos vivos complejos este?n constituidos por unidades diminutas, auto?nomas y autorreguladas, esas que en el siglo XVII Robert Hooke vio a trave?s de su microscopio y bautizo? con el nombre que hoy conocemos. Aquel hallazgo, seguido de una cada vez mejor comprensio?n de la fisiologi?a celular cambio? para siempre (y au?n determina) la manera en que abordamos la medicina, la ciencia, la biologi?a, las estructuras sociales y hasta la cultura. Una fractura de cadera, una parada cardiaca, el Alzheimer, el sida, un ca?ncer de pulmo?n... todo, absolutamente todo, puede explicarse como el resultado del funcionamiento ano?malo de las ce?lulas o de los ecosistemas que estas forman. Y tambie?n todo deberi?a poder tratarse mediante su manipulacio?n terape?utica. Esta revolucio?n en el campo de la biologi?a celular ya ha demostrado resultados transformadores y hoy se plantea como uno de los avances cienti?ficos que ma?s vidas pueden salvar.

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (4.02)
0.5
1 2
1.5
2 4
2.5
3 9
3.5 5
4 37
4.5 3
5 26

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 204,659,551 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible