PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

The Good Place and Philosophy (Popular…
Cargando...

The Good Place and Philosophy (Popular Culture and Philosophy, 130) (edición 2019)

por Steven A. Benko (Editor)

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaConversaciones
1611,302,493 (3)Ninguno
The Good Place is a fantasy-comedy TV show about the afterlife. Eleanor dies and finds herself in the Good Place, which she understands must be mistake, since she has been anything but good. In the surprise twist ending to Season One, it is revealed that this is really the Bad Place, but the demon who planned it was frustrated, because the characters didn't torture each other mentally as planned, but managed to learn how to live together. InThe Good Place and Philosophy, twenty-one philosophers analyze different aspects of the ethical and metaphysical issues raised in the show, including: â-- Indefinitely long punishment can only be justified as a method of ultimately improving vicious characters, not as retribution. â-- Can individuals retain their identity after hundreds of reboots? â-- Comparing Hinduism withThe Good Place, we can conclude that Hinduism gets things five percent correct. â-- Looking at all the events in the show, it follows that humans don't have free will, and so people are being punished and rewarded unjustly. â-- Is it a problem that the show depicts torture as hilarious? This problem can be resolved by considering the limited perspective of humans, compared with the eternal perspective of the demons. â--The Good Place implies that even demons can develop morally. â-- The only way to explain how the characters remain the same people after death is to suppose that their actual bodies are transported to the afterlife. â-- Since Chidi knows all the moral theories but can never decide what to do, it must follow that there is something missing in all these theories. â-- The show depicts an afterlife which is bureaucratic, therefore unchangeable, therefore deeply unjust. â-- Eleanor acts on instinct, without thinking, whereas Chidi tries to think everything through and never gets around to acting; together these two characters can truly act morally. â--The Good Place shows us that authenticity means living for others. â--The Good Place is based on Sartre's playNo Exit, with its famous line "Hell is other people," but in fact bothNo Exit andThe Good Place inform us that human relationships can redeem us. â-- InThe Good Place, everything the humans do is impermanent since it can be rebooted, so humans cannot accomplish anything good. â-- Kant's moral precepts are supposed to be universal, butThe Good Place shows us it can be right to lie to demons. â-- The show raises the question whether we can ever be good except by being part of a virtuous community.… (más)
Miembro:justinhurst223
Título:The Good Place and Philosophy (Popular Culture and Philosophy, 130)
Autores:Steven A. Benko (Editor)
Información:Open Court (2019), 256 pages
Colecciones:Tu biblioteca
Valoración:
Etiquetas:Ninguno

Información de la obra

The Good Place and Philosophy (Popular Culture and Philosophy) por Steven A. Benko

Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

I do enjoy the Popular Culture series of "...and Philosophy"; starting all the way back with the Seinfeld and Philosophy book. I loved the show too (one of my new favorites). For those who haven't watched it - its very entertaining, funny, interesting, and is deeply philosophical, so right up my alley, and I'm sure many others.

This is a good book. Nothing amazing or spectacular, but good / very good. I do think it made an interesting choice though of being written and published as the third season was underway/finishing up, before Season 4, which was the final season of the show. (And it was even stated in this book that it was known at least at time of publishing that Season 4 would also be the final season.) So I thought it was interesting that they knowingly published it at/during/after Season 3 knowing there would be only one more season, that might have given them more material to write about, and provided things in a better context for some of the articles and arguments. Like having 3/4ths of a book to review rather than the full book.

An odd choice. It will be interesting to see if they release a revised edition with stuff about Season 4 - and if so.... I will definitely be avoiding that, as then its apparent the purpose of this book's release.

The articles were good, but with the release of season 4, made some of the comments, arguments, and articles somewhat moot or pointless or defeated. There was also a few typos that were annoying, but nothing egregious.

All in all a fine piece, but nothing wowing or spectacular. ( )
  BenKline | Jul 1, 2020 |
sin reseñas | añadir una reseña

Pertenece a las series

Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

The Good Place is a fantasy-comedy TV show about the afterlife. Eleanor dies and finds herself in the Good Place, which she understands must be mistake, since she has been anything but good. In the surprise twist ending to Season One, it is revealed that this is really the Bad Place, but the demon who planned it was frustrated, because the characters didn't torture each other mentally as planned, but managed to learn how to live together. InThe Good Place and Philosophy, twenty-one philosophers analyze different aspects of the ethical and metaphysical issues raised in the show, including: â-- Indefinitely long punishment can only be justified as a method of ultimately improving vicious characters, not as retribution. â-- Can individuals retain their identity after hundreds of reboots? â-- Comparing Hinduism withThe Good Place, we can conclude that Hinduism gets things five percent correct. â-- Looking at all the events in the show, it follows that humans don't have free will, and so people are being punished and rewarded unjustly. â-- Is it a problem that the show depicts torture as hilarious? This problem can be resolved by considering the limited perspective of humans, compared with the eternal perspective of the demons. â--The Good Place implies that even demons can develop morally. â-- The only way to explain how the characters remain the same people after death is to suppose that their actual bodies are transported to the afterlife. â-- Since Chidi knows all the moral theories but can never decide what to do, it must follow that there is something missing in all these theories. â-- The show depicts an afterlife which is bureaucratic, therefore unchangeable, therefore deeply unjust. â-- Eleanor acts on instinct, without thinking, whereas Chidi tries to think everything through and never gets around to acting; together these two characters can truly act morally. â--The Good Place shows us that authenticity means living for others. â--The Good Place is based on Sartre's playNo Exit, with its famous line "Hell is other people," but in fact bothNo Exit andThe Good Place inform us that human relationships can redeem us. â-- InThe Good Place, everything the humans do is impermanent since it can be rebooted, so humans cannot accomplish anything good. â-- Kant's moral precepts are supposed to be universal, butThe Good Place shows us it can be right to lie to demons. â-- The show raises the question whether we can ever be good except by being part of a virtuous community.

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (3)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 1
3.5
4
4.5
5

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 204,458,778 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible