Reminiscences of encounters and painting trips to native villages in British Columbia during the early 20thC, with a surprisingly modern perspective on indigenous cultures. Interesting to contrast with Francis Poole's account, a generation earlier, of colonists' exploration for mineral resources on the Queen Charlotte Islands (Haida Gwaii), which introduced smallpox and praised the benefits of missionaries for First Nations populations up and down the coast. Carr's own criticisms of missionaries were expurgated from the first editions of this book. ( )

While I think the stories in this book are important, they do not represent Carr's best. Many are repetitive. The value of the book lies in the portraits she paints of the changes to the tribes in and around British Columbia. ( )

In this small book, basically a set of vignettes, Emily Carr writes about her travels in the wilderness of British Columbia and her relationships with the Indians. There is very little about her paintings, but we learn a lot about her courage and her compassion. ( )

This book is composed of short chapters written by Emliy Carr of her efforts to sketch and paint the totem poles found on the Queen Charlotte Islands. She is a brave and adventurous young woman who travels alone with her dog to these remote locations by hitching a ride by canoe or wagon to isolated native villages. She writes beautifully and describes so well the wild nature and elements of the villages. Her prose captures the dampness of the rain forests and the abundance of growth and greenery. Her descriptions of the totems is revealing. She has an interesting perspective on missionaries and the RCMP. She easily developed a rapport with the natives because of her innocence and her curiosity. I enjoyed this story very much. I will read more about this overlooked and talented Canadian artist. ( )

I loved this book. I don't say that very often but this is an exceptional book. In the forword Ira Dilworth talks about Carr's writing process:
I have seen her "peeling" a sentence, as she called it,--a process which involved stripping away all ambiguous or unnecessary words, replacing a vague word by a sharper, clearer one until the sentence emerged clean and precise in its meaning and strong in its impact on the reader. As a result, there is in her writing the quality of immediacy, the ability, by means of descriptive words chosen with the greatest accuracy, to carry the reader into the very heart of the experience she is describing, whether it be an incident from her own childhood or a sketch of an Indian and his village--and that so swiftly as to give an impression almost of magic, of incatation.

I did feel carried into the places she described and I felt like I knew the people she met. I think the story that had the most strong effect on me was "Sophie". Sophie was a woman who came by Carr's studio in Vancouver to sell her baskets. Carr didn't have any money to pay her but Sophie told her she would take some old clothes. Sophie left the basket she wanted even though Carr said she would have to go back to Victoria to get the clothes and that wouldn't be for some time. Sophie told her she lived in the North Vancouver Mission and that anyone there would know her. Some time later Carr took the clothes over to Sophie and they became friends. One of the first things Sophie did was take Carr to the cemetary where her children were buried. Almost every year Sophie had a baby and almost every year she buried a child. Sophie had twenty-one children in all and none of them survived her. I think this story speaks volumes about the kind of person Emily Carr was. She could be good friends with an illiterate woman who had nothing, not even the children she bore. ( )