PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

Cargando...

Law librarian use of google and its apps & features

por Primary Research Group

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaConversaciones
2Ninguno5,214,938NingunoNinguno
This 200+ page study present detailed data and commentary about how law librarians are using Google and its apps and features such as: Gmail, Google Scholar, Google Drive, Notifications, Alerts, Google Books, Google Maps, Chrome, Google Images, Google+, Hangouts, Calendar, Translate, Google Public Data Explorer and many other applications. The reports presents data on how valued each of these services are and who is using them, how much and with what impact. Google is a major productivity tool and its proper use enormously benefits law librarians who know best how to exploit its many free and relatively low cost features. This report quantifies and details their efforts. Data is broken out by many criteria such as type of law library, work title of librarian, and age, gender and compensation level of librarian, among others. Just a few of this comprehensive study's many findings are that:* Use of the Google search engine accounted for 73.23%, of total search engine use was by the law librarians sampled. * A majority (80.96%) of respondents reported Google Maps to be either useful (16.67%), quite useful (45.24%), or essential (19.05%).* Just under half (45.24%) of respondents used Google Patent Search. A strong majority of these respondents were associated with law firm libraries.* A small minority (7.14%) of the sample noted that Google Public Data Explorer was useful, quite useful, or essential to them, with younger individuals (30 to 49) and those from government agencies/private companies being most likely to feel that this application was useful.* Respondents spent, on average, 35.81 hours per month using Chrome for work.* Respondents spent, on average, 2.90 hours per month using Google Drive for work (range: 0.00 to 30.00 hours). Those from college/universities and those from law firm libraries spent the most time using this tool (mean: 4.26 hours and 3.20 hours, respectively).… (más)

Sin etiquetas

Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

Ninguna reseña
sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

This 200+ page study present detailed data and commentary about how law librarians are using Google and its apps and features such as: Gmail, Google Scholar, Google Drive, Notifications, Alerts, Google Books, Google Maps, Chrome, Google Images, Google+, Hangouts, Calendar, Translate, Google Public Data Explorer and many other applications. The reports presents data on how valued each of these services are and who is using them, how much and with what impact. Google is a major productivity tool and its proper use enormously benefits law librarians who know best how to exploit its many free and relatively low cost features. This report quantifies and details their efforts. Data is broken out by many criteria such as type of law library, work title of librarian, and age, gender and compensation level of librarian, among others. Just a few of this comprehensive study's many findings are that:* Use of the Google search engine accounted for 73.23%, of total search engine use was by the law librarians sampled. * A majority (80.96%) of respondents reported Google Maps to be either useful (16.67%), quite useful (45.24%), or essential (19.05%).* Just under half (45.24%) of respondents used Google Patent Search. A strong majority of these respondents were associated with law firm libraries.* A small minority (7.14%) of the sample noted that Google Public Data Explorer was useful, quite useful, or essential to them, with younger individuals (30 to 49) and those from government agencies/private companies being most likely to feel that this application was useful.* Respondents spent, on average, 35.81 hours per month using Chrome for work.* Respondents spent, on average, 2.90 hours per month using Google Drive for work (range: 0.00 to 30.00 hours). Those from college/universities and those from law firm libraries spent the most time using this tool (mean: 4.26 hours and 3.20 hours, respectively).

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Ninguno

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: No hay valoraciones.

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 203,188,058 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible