Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... Shame and Necessity (1994)por Bernard Williams
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
Pertenece a las series
El autor se centra en las ideas éticas de los griegos, en particular en las de acción responsable, justicia y en las motivaciones que llevan a las personas a hacer cosas admiradas y respetadas, con el objetivo de describir filosóficamente una realidad histórica. A través de la tragedia y la literatura Williams muestra cómo se concebían la vergüenza y la necesidad en la Antigüedad clásica y el papel que jugaban en la explicación de las acciones y de la vida humana, a la vez que enfatiza el valor que todavía hoy tienen en la comprensión del mundo. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)881.0109384Literature Greek and other Classical languages Greek Classical poetry Different categories of Greek classical poetry Philosophy and Theory ArchaicClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
Williams' central claim is that our understanding of ancient Greek tragedy, moral philosophy and indeed their "world view" at large is distorted by certain modern misconceptions concerning the nature of morality, human action, and the will. Once we see at least the contingency of modern views about the relation between free will and action, between abstract, characterless universal reason and ethics--and indeed, Williams argues that the former in each of the previous dyad is not only the result of a contingent cultural formation but basically just a mistake--we will be both more inclined to see the Greeks as closer to us, as less exotic, and we will be better able to understand them at all.
If you are a diehard Kantian, or are loathe to consider that our ideas about free will might be just a bit confused, you will probably find this book disappointing, and feel like it just glosses over a lot of philosophical issues. It does. But its purpose is not strictly speaking philosophical in this sense. I think it is fair to say it is an application of more properly "philosophical" arguments Williams has made elsewhere concerning the will, morality, etc. to Greek tragedy and philosophy (see, for example, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy). If you read it as such, and approach it with at least some skepticism about Williams' critical targets, I think you will find it an immensely enjoyable and intellectually stimulating read. ( )