Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... La Ciencia y el campo akásico : una teoría integral del todo (2004)por Ervin Laszlo
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. sin reseñas | añadir una reseña
En este libro, Ervin Laszlo hace un repaso de los enigmas que se encuentran en la ciencia contemporánea: el universo como un todo manifiesta correlaciones bien afinadas que desafían cualquier explicación de sentido común; existen correlaciones directas asombrosas, al nivel de la cuántica: cada partícula que haya ocupado alguna vez el mismo nivel cuántico de otra partícula permanece relacionada con ella, de una misteriosa manera no-energética (el enmarañamiento cuántico); la teoría de la evolución post-darwiniana y la biología cuántica descubren enigmáticas correlaciones similares en el organismo y entre el organismo y su entorno; todas las correlaciones que salen a la luz en las más avanzadas investigaciones sobre la conciencia son igual de extrañas: tienen la forma de "conexiones transpersonales" entre la conciencia de una persona y el cuerpo de otra. Si alguna vez ha querido tener el universo en sus manos, lea este libro. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)501Natural sciences and mathematics General Science Philosophy and theoryClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
I'm wondering if people at are familiar with Laszlo's work and how it stands in relation to current developments in the field. When I read it many years ago I thought it was crap in terms of trying to explain a new leap-forward in our understanding, and the possibility of a whole host of hitherto unimaginable new applications and new areas for research. Fortunately, it was not to be. Last thing I heard, the publishing house passed on the manuscript. The majority verdict from peer review being it was way too left-field.
Since then, Sheldrake, Laszlo, and anyone else who dares mention such non-materialistic field theories, seem to have increasingly been tarred as 'woo merchants' and pushed from the radar as they should; unfortunately they were replaced by the largely mechanistic materialism of the likes of Dawkins and the Bad Science skeptics, whose main interest seems to be measuring how many bits of material they can get to fly out of gazillion dollar particle colliders, and whipping up arguments on how many particles can dance on the head of a pin. Is this an accurate characterisation of the course of international science over the past 2 decades I'm wondering? If so, why? How might we use Bacon's scientific method to determine the underlying causes of such phenomena and events?
It takes considerable effort to explain why such inane and physics-illiterate writings don't even really amount to sensible theories of any kind - let alone physical field theories - and reading that kind of stuff leaves a very bad taste in the mouth to boot. What really irks - apart from the unwarranted soft science background smears ;-) - is the ironic insinuation that we alI lack enthusiasm for 'thinking outside of the box' etc. and are just being peremptorily dismissive. Show me a well-informed and cogent attempt at some new idea in mathematical physics or whatever and it'll get the respect it deserves - no matter how wacky it appears prima facie. Show me someone’s moronic Morphic/Akashic/PSI/Intention 'field theory' - yet again! - And it will indeed be dismissed as pseudoscience - because that is exactly what it is.
The Akashic Field is sillier mambo-jumbo from Laszlo. Enough said. ( )