I have a lot of interest in this topic. I have nothing to hide, but really find it offensive that the govt thinks they can spy on us. Book started off strong. loved the background of how Gellman first got involved with Snowden. The precautions he took to communicate were fascinating, as were the spy programs that were uncovered. However, in the second half of the book, I thought the author started wandering around a bit with some trivial things, like what the NSA program names were. Would have liked to hear about any harms that could be attributed to Americans about the spying. But the NSA - sheesh - they can spy on anything! ( )

The story of Edward Snowden and the information he revealed is fascinating on so many levels. I'm a big journalism junkie and I really enjoyed this look at the story from former Washington Post reporter Barton Gellman. I found Gellman to be very even handed, in the way real journalism needs to be, but not falling prey to false equivalencies. He gives a great tick-tock of the days after he is initially contacted by an anonymous source all the way through the beginnings of the publication of the leaked material. I found his portrayal of personalities to ring true, both with what I already know about all of them and just intuitively. Mr. Gellman is a veteran of this type of reporting and it shows. He is careful, meticulous, and exact in his wording. He also talks a lot of spying and security in the modern age and here again he gives both sides and refuses to fall into either the "ALL information must be free" or "Snowden is a traitor" camps. It is a very complex issue that cannot be reduced to a binary on or off analysis. I think this book is at its best when he is going through the timeline of receipt, analysis, and publication of the documents, that part reads like a very intelligent thriller. And it is real. There are important issues in this book and Mr. Gellman does a great job of presenting them in an interesting and understandable way. I know that nuance and considered thought is dead in our current society (see the freeDUMB protesters trying to open things up too fast) but Mr. Gellman delivers it wonderfully here. ( )

Not just anyone could do it, but it doesn’t take super villain levels of capability to make it happen. All it would take is paying attention to how the system works, which is your job”



Edward Snowden to Barton Gellman in “Dark Mirror” by Barton Gellman



“The defining feature of Snowden’s young adulthood was a knack for breaking down problems, unpacking the parts, discerning how the innards worked, and shaping them to his will. He had an eye for hidden openings. It was a hacker’s frame of mind, in the classic sense, applicable as much to daily life as to machines. [...] automate a tedious task or substitute a more efficient one. Rewrite or repurpose any product, any process, if you can turn it yo your own ends. Share the recipe.”



In “Dark Mirror” by Barton Gellman





Me: “Anything to keep us safe. Anything. Please, feel free to trawl through my rubbish, to bug my bedroom, to tail me to work, to eavesdrop on my phone conversations, to peruse my emails. I have no idea what liberty is or whether I even deserve it but I know that my beautiful government only wants the best in this best of all possible worlds. My soul, my intellect, my integrity is nothing compared to the greater good. I am completely expendable and exist only to make life easier for the government who will do everything to protect me from threats left, right and center. I want them to scan me when I leave the house, when I get on the bus, when I enter the office, when I go to a sports match, when I go to a restaurant. I have neither the judgment nor the ability to know whether I am a threat to the general public. My thoughts, my words, my deeds must be recorded, registered, interpreted, sanctioned, filed, stored and preserved in the name of a liberty I am too ignorant to understand. The evil we face is simply beyond my limited immagination and I will accept any humiliation because I have learned that CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE WHAT MAKES TERRORISM POSSIBLE! and anyone who refuses to spy on his neighbours or sleep with one eye open IS A TRAITOR!!!!!”

NSA: “Indeed does your grammar needs constant attention and correction by the secret intelligence services. The word is not ‘immagination’ but ‘imagination’. Clearly a threat to the integrity of English literary heritage.”

Me: “I take my hat off to you, sir. You are just the sort of vigilant anti-terrorist that makes me proud to hand over my civil liberties without asking for anything in return. In fact, the double "m" was part of an encrypted message that I thought I had manage to pass on to the terrorists without the dozy on-line community noticing but I clearly hadn't reckoned upon the likes of you. I trust this will earn you the promotion you so richly reserve and if there is anything else I need to confess too, rest assured that I remain available for waterboarding at a moment's notice.”

Me: “That's it for me. I'm not using Google anymore, or the Internet. I've had enough of this vacuous nonsense. No more shall I sit in front of a laptop for hours wondering: what a load of bollocks I've been looking at. This will be the last post on here or anywhere for that matter. Have a nice day. Where the hell are my Signet classics?”

A few moments later.

Me: “Oh shit, I've just realised they will find my hamster video that I put online years ago to test this internet lark out. This is not going to go well for me when I'm acting totally bad ass in the interrogation room with the CIA and they put Fluffy on the projector.” ( )

Barton Gellman's journalistic story is what drew me to this book. I remembered when the Edward Snowden whistleblower news hit the headlines and wanted to revisit that. And in reading this eye-opening book about the NSA's surveillance procedures and a story that went way beyond those past news' headlines, I learned so many more important things that I think as an American citizen I should know. I highly recommend this important book. ( )

As it happens, I just ran across an article pertinent to this book and review: https://www.lawfareblog.com/cyber-budget-shows-what-us-values%E2%80%94and-it-isn...

Ironically, Gellman was not the first choice for Snowden to use as a conduit for the extraordinary information he had gleaned from the NSA related to their surveillance of U.S.citizens. Glenn Greenwald had ignored Snowden's tentative approach, all cloaked with great secrecy, of course. Gellman's description of the techniques he used to hide what he was doing was fascinating by itself.

What did Snowden reveal? The NSA's stated goal is to collect and process everything, all communications. They have a huge volume problem. They try to filter out the junk and ignore the spam, but sophisticated opposition has realized that spam can be used to hide messages. They look for anything with lists, address books connected to individual accounts, to build sophisticated social network analysis. A lot of digital traffic moves through the United States making the NSA's job easier. Even a phone call from Spain to Colombia may be routed through the U.S. Fears of Chinese dominance through Huawei may be justified. The NSA has legal coercive powers to force communications entities to turn over anything they ask for. So if they are denied access in the U.S., they simply go to one of the social network technologies centers in another country and get it from there. General Hayden former NSA Director justified the sweeping collection of data by saying that "you can't find a needle in a haystack without the haystack." But just as it would be useful to search every house on the block to find something doesn't mean you should be allowed to do it.

Gellman insists that Snowden's revelations did more good than harm but he cocedes that some harm may have been done. The Communications system is so complicated and intertwined that Snowden insists that many processes the NSA had in place change and don't work any more simply based on changes to the communications infrastructure that had nothing to do with Snowden. Firmware gets updated, hardware and software changed, so much of their success must rely on mistakes made by others and the capabilities are constantly being changed.

Perhaps an irony of Snowdon's actions is that he revealed how poor the NSA was at keeping its own secrets. We have learned since that the NSA "lost" many very sophisticated hacking tools, which were later used to wreck substantial damage around the world when modified slightly by malicious hackers. Another irony is that some of the NSA's biggest defenders and Snowden's antagonists have done a 360 since Trump and his tyrannical postures have been revealed. Government can't be trusted and the president has no interest in any legal restraints on his power. Jim Clapper who originally wanted Gellman arrested now questions whether there are enough restraints in place to prevent abuse. The Internet is far more secure than it was before the revelations and even some national security types and James Comey said to the author that Snowden did more good than harm.

Gellman met many times with Snowden and the section on their relationship is fascinating. How they communicated, how trust changed and morphed. Snowden is a man of very strong principles and a zealot, perhaps overly confident in his own rightness. An autodidact, he's very well and widely read so discussions would range over many areas. Ultimately, Snowden got stuck in Moscow because the U.S. canceled his passport hoping to keep him in Hong Kong but he was already on a plane intending to transfer in Moscow for elswhere, but when they landed the authorities said he could not leave because his passport was no longer valid.

Gellman suffered no legal consequences for publishing the Snowden material, and in an interview on Lawfare, Gellman makes the distinction between espionage and reporting. The spy seeks out information that he wants to keep secret and to use that information to harm his adversary. The journalist, on the other hand seeks to make the information public to encourage debate as to whether his society wants to approve and continue certain actions. That kind of debate is essential in a free and democratic society.

Much of the distrust for government stems from Watergate and Vietnam during which it became clear that government was lying to the public to prevent them from know what their government was doing. Snowden's revelations have not assuaged that distrust. ( )