Unger does a nice job of weaving historical context with a study of Michelangelo's personality and the context of his major works. I was not very knowledgeable about the time period or about Michelangelo and so I found this informative and not difficult to read. I think for someone who already has a deep background in the subject a lot of this might be review. But, from what I can tell, Unger differentiates his views from those of other biographers, so there might be something new here as well. ( )

This is probably as good a biography of Michelangelo as any I have read. I liked the way Unger used his "six masterpieces" to structure the narrative. M comes across as a grumpy genius. He accepted more commissions than he could complete. Once hired, he imposed his own vision on his art regardless of the desires of his patrons, including numerous popes. He had somewhat of an inferiority complex, coming from a less than wealthy family, and lacking a formal education. He insisted on artists such as himself as being coequal with the highest classes of society. Although famously known for some of his paintings, e.g., the Sistine Chapel, M regarded it as a lesser art form than sculpture. Never married, there is speculation he was gay, which in that time and place, while not unusual, was also sanctioned as criminal behavior. This book successfully intertwines history and art . ( )

Caution: Genius at Work

I can honestly say I’ve never read a biography as gripping as Michelangelo. His life was a constant controversy. He made enemies, he dodged (metaphorical) bullets, and he made art. He was an unpleasant misogynist who ironically adored nothing more than portraying the human body. He was universally recognized as the greatest, within his own lifetime. He lied and embellished, but his art speaks for itself. It all makes for a great read.

He was doubly cursed; he lived in interesting times, and was an interesting character. Michelangelo’s greatest achievement was to fuse the artist and his work. That is a huge transition point, centered on Michelangelo in this warts and all biography. Because in addition to taking art in a whole new direction, complementing rather than being subservient to religion, Michelangelo turns out to be arrogant, obnoxious, self-centered, narcissistic, antisocial, overbearing and uncaring about any of it. Despite it all, he was the first superstar of art.

He never married, and there were of course questions about his sexual preferences, what with all those nude males he clearly preferred. He deflected them all by saying his art was all the wife he could handle. Later in life, he risked having close relationships with younger men. He was a drama queen; his favorite tactic was to threaten to quit unless he got everything he wanted. And he quit often anyway. He was a notorious abandoner, starting projects and never completing them. There are far more of them than completed works.

Despite abusing his body with little food, minimal rest, and zero care, he lived into his eighties. He outlived nine popes, and worked with five of them. They were often personal friends of his from childhood, which allowed him to be even more arrogant and petulant than he would otherwise. He seemed to have written it all down in letters and poems, and it is juicily reproduced here. This biography is as flesh and blood as Michelangelo’s sculptures and paintings, a fitting framework if ever there was one. ( )