Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.
Cargando... The Mighty Dead: Why Homer Matters (2014)por Adam Nicolson
Ninguno Cargando...
Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará. Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro. A fine and deep investigation of Homer himself, the Iliad and the Odyssey. Included are discussions of the poems' meanings to the Comte de Saint-Victor, Goethe, Pope, Plato and Keats; the history of our understanding of who or what Homer was; a visit to Chios; Milman Parry and the use of formulaic phrases in epic poetry; the nature of the people who spoke the language that is the source of all of the Indo-European languages and their relationship to the source of the Iliad; relevant archaeological findings including those of Schliemann; a history of the bronze age; how the Greeks of the Iliad are sociologically like modern day teenage gangs;what the Egyptians and the Hittites thought of the bronze-age Greeks from their own writings...and all with many selections from the Iliad and Odyssey with the author's explanation of the original Greek and various published translations. Throughout this tour de force, the author tells us the importance of the poems to him personally and his opinion of their importance to all of us. Marvelous book. I have wanted to read The Odyssey, interested in particular in the newest translation by Emily Wilson. I have attempted the Iliad and not got far. I picked up The Mighty Dead on a remainders table and it has hung around until the reading of Circe by Madeline Miller so enchanted me that I wanted to recommit to reading Homer. I know of myself that difficult works are sometimes made easier by reading something secondary to help orient myself. Beginning something, like The Iliad and The Odyssey, with a sense of why they are classics, why they are important, what they have meant and may mean can carry me through some of the difficulty. In short, The Mighty Dead: Why Homer Matters fit this bill. Nicholson approaches his question of why Homer matters from many angles, including historical, linguistic, and personal. He draws on his own experience of sailing and the sea. In a stunning section, he describes his victimization at the hands of a stranger in Syria. He explores other artistic representations of the life-world of the Greeks, and speculates (convincingly enough for me) about pre-historic encounters between peoples of the Northern Steppes and those of the more advanced cultures from the Middle East. Much of this was completely new to me and I think it a testament to the book and to Nicholson's writing that it all coheres, and fascinatingly so. In the later chapters, I did struggle--but with my expectations and desires. As everyone knows, The Iliad is about a war and revels in bloodletting. I, being peaceable, don't like that and want it to be rejected and argued against (it seems a little childish, sentimental and high-minded, but there you have it). As Nicholson makes clear this is not what Homer is up to. So I squirmed through pages of detailed exploration of the violence committed, reveled in, the thoughts about where it comes from and why. As I read, I recognized that my discomfort reflects back on our own days of violence and inhumanity. I demand of Nicholson and Homer: What will you say against this? In the Conclusion, the final four pages of the book, Nicholson explicitly acknowledges the problem, the discomfort we all must feel. He writes: "Homer's embrace of wrongness, his depiction of a world that stands at a certain angle to virtue, is the heart of why we love him. He does not give us a set of exemplars. These poems are not sermons. We do not want Achilles or even Odysseus to be our model as men. Nor Penelope or Helen as women. Nor do we want to worship at the shrine of Bronze Age thuggery. What we want is Homeric wisdom, his fearless encounter with the dreadful, his love of love and hatred of death, the sheer scale of his embrace, his energy and brightness, his resistance to nostalgia..." P. 250. The entirety of these last four pages could bear quoting, but instead you can read the book. Nicholson is a fine writer with an intimate tone that I liked. He connects so many strands across literature, language, history. The book has excellent notes and a bibliography that I want to explore. I highly recommend.
Here is a book on Homer that has been reviewed in the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Slate, and the Guardian, among others, but not, as far as I know, in any classical journal. Yet it is an important book for classical scholars to read—not because it offers anything both new and true about Homer, but because it shows an educated, widely experienced person creating deeply felt meaning out of Homer and some strands of Homeric scholarship. Nicolson belongs in the tradition of great amateurs of Homer: Keats, Gladstone, Matthew Arnold, or T. E. Lawrence. His book shows what Homer can do. PremiosDistinciones
Adam Nicolson nos brinda la oportunidad de conocer a un Homero de nuestro tiempo, un sabio cercano que, sentado junto a nosotros y charlando amistosamente, nos aconseja e interpela. Se trata de una obra única para adentrarse en la figura del gran poeta griego: con un tono próximo, alejado de toda erudición, pero sin perder la rigurosidad, comprendemos sus ideas esenciales: la épica, la formación de la mente subjetiva, el valor de la memoria, el recuerdo del pasado arrasado por la historia… Un libro que es un personal recorrido por la figura de Homero como hombre y como pensador, y por su extraordinaria época. Este perfecto viaje nos acerca a la gran literatura clásica, nos brinda la sabiduría que emana de esos grandes poemas épicos –La Odisea y La Ilíada-, y nos descubre cuánto tienen que enseñarnos todavía sobre los grandes temas de la humanidad: el amor, la pérdida, la madurez o el placer. Una aventura hacia el autoconocimento. No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca. |
Antiguo miembro de Primeros reseñadores de LibraryThingEl libro Why Homer Matters de Adam Nicolson estaba disponible desde LibraryThing Early Reviewers. Debates activosNingunoCubiertas populares
Google Books — Cargando... GénerosSistema Decimal Melvil (DDC)883.01Literature Greek and other Classical languages Prose and Fiction, Classical Greek Pseudo-CallisthenesClasificación de la Biblioteca del CongresoValoraciónPromedio:
¿Eres tú?Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing. |
This is fascinating stuff, but I was not really convinced that this shows the epics were penned as early as he says, given that it is generally accepted anyway that Homer was recording, in the then very new medium of writing, epics passed down in oral form from generation to generation for centuries beforehand. Other scholars have pointed out that, given the similarity of style, the two epics were probably written down by the same person consecutively, as the Odyssey is aware of the existence of the Iliad, but not vice versa - "The Odyssey, with extraordinary care, is shaped around the pre-existence of the Iliad. It fills in details that are absent from the earlier poem – the Trojan Horse, the death of Achilles – but never mentions anything that is described there".
Despite this very interesting exploration of historical, archaeological, cultural and linguistic issues, I had a problem with aspects of his writing style and choice of material. The language is often rather elaborate and I found some of the description overblown and too "stream of consciousness" for my liking. I didn't see the point of including some of his personal material, in particular the inclusion of an incident from his youth when he was raped by a stranger of his own age, which seemed entirely gratuitous to me. So I was left with rather mixed feelings about this book. ( )