PortadaGruposCharlasMásPanorama actual
Buscar en el sitio
Este sitio utiliza cookies para ofrecer nuestros servicios, mejorar el rendimiento, análisis y (si no estás registrado) publicidad. Al usar LibraryThing reconoces que has leído y comprendido nuestros términos de servicio y política de privacidad. El uso del sitio y de los servicios está sujeto a estas políticas y términos.

Resultados de Google Books

Pulse en una miniatura para ir a Google Books.

The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas…
Cargando...

The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left (edición 2013)

por Yuval Levin

MiembrosReseñasPopularidadValoración promediaMenciones
294789,402 (3.67)2
"In The Great Debate Yuval Levin explores the origins of the familiar left/right divide in American politics by examining the views of the men who best represent each side of that debate: Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine. In a groundbreaking exploration of the origins of our political order, Levin shows that our political divide did not originate (as many historians argue) in the French Revolution, but rather in the Anglo-American debate about that revolution. Burke and Paine were both utterly fascinating figures--active in politics, versed in philosophy, and two of the best, most effective and powerful political writers and polemicists in the history of the English speaking world. Levin sets the work of these two men against the dramatic history of their era and shows how they mixed theory and practice to advance their very different notions of liberty, equality, nature, history, reason, revolution, and reform. Paine believed in radical change and saw the American and French Revolutions as catalysts for creating a new society; Burke believed in a significantly more gradual approach with each generation acting merely as part of a long chain of history. These differing approaches to revolution and reform created a division that continues to shape our current political discourse--including issues ranging from gun control and abortion to welfare and economic reform"--… (más)
Miembro:Atomicmutant
Título:The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left
Autores:Yuval Levin
Información:Basic Books (2013), Hardcover, 296 pages
Colecciones:Tu biblioteca
Valoración:
Etiquetas:Ninguno

Información de la obra

El gran debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine y el nacimiento de la derecha y de la izquierda por Yuval Levin

Ninguno
Cargando...

Inscríbete en LibraryThing para averiguar si este libro te gustará.

Actualmente no hay Conversaciones sobre este libro.

» Ver también 2 menciones

Great short book contrasting/comparing Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine as prototypes of AngloAmerican right and left wings. The author is a conservative but his treatment seems entirely fair and generous to me. People are what they are on that spectrum, and sometimes they move a bit, but this is the kind of valuable book that lets an open-minded person on either side understand a little better where people on the other side are coming from. It's fine to be a partisan but it's foolish to assume your adversaries are stupid, misinformed, or just plain evil. ( )
  steve02476 | Jan 3, 2023 |
Intriguing book about the modern origins of the debate between periodically "wiping the slate clean" as advocated by Thomas Paine and gradual, incremental reforms, as advocated by Edmund Burke. Apparently the two once dined together. I woiuld have like to be a fly on the wall to see such two great, opposing minds together.

In any event, the author clearly favors the more conservative philosophy of Edmund Burke. Thomas Payne apparently had a reputation as a bit of a "flame thrower. Levin tries to modulate that somewhat but it doesn't escape the pages. ( )
  JBGUSA | Jan 2, 2023 |
I'll admit to skimming some of it. I was rather familiar with Paine and his arguments. Burke, however, I only knew from his essay on the sublime and was intrigued and, ultimately, thrilled at his clarity of thought(much more clear then his essay on the sublime).

I found myself surprised and agreeing with both. I liked the chapter on justice(particularly pertinent at the moment) and Levin seems to be a rising thinker around here so I was interested in his summation(and was not disappointed).

I do dispute his thesis, though. I believe the rise of the "left" and "right" has much older origins(some of which he references himself---Hobbes and Locke, for instance). But it was an interesting dive into a time and dialogue that I am always willing to learn about. Now if A Time to Build will just come off the reserve list... ( )
  OutOfTheBestBooks | Sep 24, 2021 |
In The Great Debate, Yuval Levin explores the roots of the left/right political divide in America by examining the views of the men who best represented each side at its origin: Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine. Striving to forge a new political path in the tumultuous age of the American and French revolutions, these two ideological titans sparred over moral and philosophical questions about the nature of political life and the best approach to social change: radical and swift, or gradual and incremental. The division they articulated continues to shape our political life today.

Essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the basis of our political order and Washington's acrimonious rifts today, The Great Debate offers a profound examination of what conservatism, progressivism, and the debate between them truly amount to. ( )
  aitastaes | Jan 2, 2020 |
The most useful and engaging aspect of the book is the evocation of Edmond Burke’s political philosophy, to which, to my surprise, I was far more sympathetic than to that of Paine’s. I was so much more sympathetic to Burke that about half-way through the book I started to question the trustworthiness of the author. It was around that point that I started to lose patience with the repetitiousness of the argument. Burke’s point of view was well laid out in the first chapter or two and thereafter it was more or less obvious what his position would in the contexts the author introduced in each chapter. The same could be said for Paine. After the first couple of chapters there were very few kernels of revelation, so the book seemed to travel in a wide spiral, circling back over concepts in each chapter and in the end not getting very far. I read the conclusion at that halfway mark to gauge whether it would be worth reading the rest of the book to get there. The conclusion was muddled. The author was to have demonstrated his thesis that these two lines of though form the basis of the modern political ideological divide between right and left. What I found was a muddled series of equivocations. Nevertheless, I continued to the end, which speaks for how much I enjoyed the presentation of the ideas, and there were enough nuggets along the way that made it worthwhile.
Throughout the book I found myself identifying the ideas of Burke with the left and Paine with the right. So, while I can see the clear divide between those two men, their heritage is less clear in today’s schism. The author would have done us a service by examining how those original ideas metamorphosed into today’s camps. For all of its flaws, I’m glad I read it and would recommend it to anyone for a good summary of these influential ideas.
  sethwilpan | Aug 12, 2019 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 7 (siguiente | mostrar todos)
Notwithstanding his involvement in the controversies of the moment, if one judges by his new book, The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left, Levin prefers the classics to more contemporary fare.

The Great Debate stands apart from many conservative books of the last decade because it is aimed almost quaintly above the current debates of the day. Barack Obama’s name appears once—in an offhand mention at the end that even the world’s most famous community organizer has claimed to be a Burkean at heart.

As Levin’s subtitle suggests, the book argues that these two contemporaries were the founders of the modern Anglo-American right (Burke) and left (Paine). Now, while the politician and polemicist Burke has long been considered the father of modern conservatism, Paine is far less likely to be considered a founding father by today’s left. But he does stand out as perhaps the greatest contemporary American defender of the French Revolution, a cataclysmic event that is widely, and rightly, seen as the birthplace of, variously, the left, the “revolutionary tradition,” and/or totalitarianism itself. Meanwhile, Burke was the greatest critic of the French Revolution in the English-speaking world, a fact that shocked many Americans who revered Burke for his moral support of the American Revolution. . . .

While it is obvious that Levin’s deeper affection is for Burke, he is never heavy-handed about it. Indeed, by the end of the book, it is clear that Levin is not really interested in selling the argument in his subtitle. Instead, he simply lets the men speak for themselves and trusts the reader to provide the context as needed. As Levin concedes, this is partly due to the fact that while the divergent worldviews of Burke and Paine illuminate important differences between right and left, they also clearly illuminate disagreements that run through the heart of Anglo-American life. These are two strands that together form—or at least deeply inform—the DNA of our political culture, and together they create family resemblances that transcend the conventional ideological divide.
añadido por TomVeal | editarCommentary, Jonah Goldberg (Jan 1, 2014)
 
Debes iniciar sesión para editar los datos de Conocimiento Común.
Para más ayuda, consulta la página de ayuda de Conocimiento Común.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Fecha de publicación original
Personas/Personajes
Lugares importantes
Acontecimientos importantes
Películas relacionadas
Epígrafe
Dedicatoria
Primeras palabras
Citas
Últimas palabras
Aviso de desambiguación
Editores de la editorial
Blurbistas
Idioma original
DDC/MDS Canónico
LCC canónico

Referencias a esta obra en fuentes externas.

Wikipedia en inglés

Ninguno

"In The Great Debate Yuval Levin explores the origins of the familiar left/right divide in American politics by examining the views of the men who best represent each side of that debate: Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine. In a groundbreaking exploration of the origins of our political order, Levin shows that our political divide did not originate (as many historians argue) in the French Revolution, but rather in the Anglo-American debate about that revolution. Burke and Paine were both utterly fascinating figures--active in politics, versed in philosophy, and two of the best, most effective and powerful political writers and polemicists in the history of the English speaking world. Levin sets the work of these two men against the dramatic history of their era and shows how they mixed theory and practice to advance their very different notions of liberty, equality, nature, history, reason, revolution, and reform. Paine believed in radical change and saw the American and French Revolutions as catalysts for creating a new society; Burke believed in a significantly more gradual approach with each generation acting merely as part of a long chain of history. These differing approaches to revolution and reform created a division that continues to shape our current political discourse--including issues ranging from gun control and abortion to welfare and economic reform"--

No se han encontrado descripciones de biblioteca.

Descripción del libro
Resumen Haiku

Debates activos

Ninguno

Cubiertas populares

Enlaces rápidos

Valoración

Promedio: (3.67)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 1
3 6
3.5 1
4 12
4.5
5 1

¿Eres tú?

Conviértete en un Autor de LibraryThing.

 

Acerca de | Contactar | LibraryThing.com | Privacidad/Condiciones | Ayuda/Preguntas frecuentes | Blog | Tienda | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas heredadas | Primeros reseñadores | Conocimiento común | 204,458,664 libros! | Barra superior: Siempre visible