A lawyer takes on the evidence of evolution. He "refutes" classical Darwinism, maintaining that there are errors in the "reasoning". Points out mysteries of gaps in selection, micro-change and sexual "choices", often made by females.

Relies upon Velikosky,among others, and finds mysteries that remain unexplained by any theory. Like Hitching a decade later, Macbeth does not actually refute the FACTS which Darwin submits. For example, he does not refute what we all can observe from the adaptation of cultivars and domesticated species, as pointed out by Darwin in the first sentence of the "Origin of Species".