Este tema está marcado actualmente como "inactivo"—el último mensaje es de hace más de 90 días. Puedes reactivarlo escribiendo una respuesta.
1chumofchance
Page to Screen: Thomas Pynchon on Film? and David Ellis's Newest Thriller
By Rachel Deahl -- Publishers Weekly, 6/25/2009 7:40:00 AM
This week in Page to Screen—PW's weekly column tracking film rights circulating and sold in Hollywood—CAA shops the new Thomas Pynchon, and Stephen Moore takes out an Edgar winner's newest thriller.
After something of a lull in Hollywood, with fewer book manuscripts circulating around town—it could have been a post-BEA malaise or the unshaky afterglow of the William Morris-Endeavor merger—a number of books started making the rounds this week. Though a rep from CAA would not comment about it, we hear Bob Bookman at the agency is shopping the film rights to Thomas Pynchon's August-dropping new novel from Penguin, Inherent Vice. The notoriously reclusive Pynchon, whose biggest flirtation with Hollywood was his pixelated cameo in The Simpsons (complete with bag-over-head), has never had any of his complex postmodern prose turned into a film, so who knows what the fate of Vice will be in Tinseltown. The book, which bloggers started chattering about back in November after some outlets, like the L.A. Times, got hold of Penguin's digital jacket copy, is promised to be leaner and less weighty than some of Pynchon's previous efforts. (It's less than 400 pages, which is something for Pynchon, who's penned 1,000-plus-page tomes.) About a billionaire land developer in late '60s L.A., per Penguin, the novel might be the author's least serious. As Wired noted: "Inherent Vice sounds less like the fractal paranoia of Gravity’s Rainbow and more like the deranged sunshine noir of The Big Lebowski." Certainly Lebowski might sit better with execs than Gravity's Rainbow, right?
By Rachel Deahl -- Publishers Weekly, 6/25/2009 7:40:00 AM
This week in Page to Screen—PW's weekly column tracking film rights circulating and sold in Hollywood—CAA shops the new Thomas Pynchon, and Stephen Moore takes out an Edgar winner's newest thriller.
After something of a lull in Hollywood, with fewer book manuscripts circulating around town—it could have been a post-BEA malaise or the unshaky afterglow of the William Morris-Endeavor merger—a number of books started making the rounds this week. Though a rep from CAA would not comment about it, we hear Bob Bookman at the agency is shopping the film rights to Thomas Pynchon's August-dropping new novel from Penguin, Inherent Vice. The notoriously reclusive Pynchon, whose biggest flirtation with Hollywood was his pixelated cameo in The Simpsons (complete with bag-over-head), has never had any of his complex postmodern prose turned into a film, so who knows what the fate of Vice will be in Tinseltown. The book, which bloggers started chattering about back in November after some outlets, like the L.A. Times, got hold of Penguin's digital jacket copy, is promised to be leaner and less weighty than some of Pynchon's previous efforts. (It's less than 400 pages, which is something for Pynchon, who's penned 1,000-plus-page tomes.) About a billionaire land developer in late '60s L.A., per Penguin, the novel might be the author's least serious. As Wired noted: "Inherent Vice sounds less like the fractal paranoia of Gravity’s Rainbow and more like the deranged sunshine noir of The Big Lebowski." Certainly Lebowski might sit better with execs than Gravity's Rainbow, right?
2paradoxosalpha
I was just looking at the latest info on imdb, and it's been out for some time that Joaquin Phoenix will appear in the role of Doc.
But Dr. Blatnoyd will be played by ... Martin Short. I think that's gonna work.
But Dr. Blatnoyd will be played by ... Martin Short. I think that's gonna work.
4paradoxosalpha
Reviews are starting to come out; the movie itself starts next week. So far, press seems positive.
I can't wait.
I can't wait.
5paradoxosalpha
Saw it today, thought it was great. Casting and performances were solid; set designs were inspired. Unsurprisingly, the script excises the trip to Las Vegas (and the earlier one to Arrepentimiento) in order to fit into a reasonable film length.
I understood a lot of plot and character elements from my reading of the novel that I worry might be opaque to more naive viewers. So far, critical press (per Metacritic) is quite positive, but the masses (Rotten Tomatoes) are not as enthusiastic.
Anybody else see it yet? Thoughts?
I understood a lot of plot and character elements from my reading of the novel that I worry might be opaque to more naive viewers. So far, critical press (per Metacritic) is quite positive, but the masses (Rotten Tomatoes) are not as enthusiastic.
Anybody else see it yet? Thoughts?
