Este tema está marcado actualmente como "inactivo"—el último mensaje es de hace más de 90 días. Puedes reactivarlo escribiendo una respuesta.
1Cynfelyn
Reposted from the Why I voted "no" thread:
I've just added an ex libris plate to an author's gallery, https://www.librarything.com/pic/6537896, not even as the primary picture. Lilithcat, a regular member of this thread, has flagged it as "Not an image of the author."
The "Guidance on author pictures", https://wiki.librarything.com/index.php/Contributing_photos_to_LibraryThing, includes "Do not post: ... Pictures that do not represent the author".
On a book website, I would say that an ex libris plate can represent an author. What do other members think?
I've just added an ex libris plate to an author's gallery, https://www.librarything.com/pic/6537896, not even as the primary picture. Lilithcat, a regular member of this thread, has flagged it as "Not an image of the author."
The "Guidance on author pictures", https://wiki.librarything.com/index.php/Contributing_photos_to_LibraryThing, includes "Do not post: ... Pictures that do not represent the author".
On a book website, I would say that an ex libris plate can represent an author. What do other members think?
2MarthaJeanne
Look at the paragraph above that:
What makes an author picture?
An author picture should be a picture of the author.
The ex libris would be appropriate on the profile page of a legacy library.
What makes an author picture?
An author picture should be a picture of the author.
The ex libris would be appropriate on the profile page of a legacy library.
