Este tema está marcado actualmente como "inactivo"—el último mensaje es de hace más de 90 días. Puedes reactivarlo escribiendo una respuesta.
3Meredy
I enjoyed that. It led me to follow several of the links on the same page until I told myself I'd have to stop and pulled away. It was easily a rabbit hole.
4rastaphrog
I took Meredys post as a fore warning and avoided clicking on other links. I'll save that for my night off when I have more time to kill. *g*
5guido47
It's all true. You will need several hours of Non Reading Time *gasp*
to appreciate this site :-)
ETA. Many hours later, I do like both versions of "The Wicker Man". Though the Cage version was not British enough for me.
to appreciate this site :-)
ETA. Many hours later, I do like both versions of "The Wicker Man". Though the Cage version was not British enough for me.
6paradoxosalpha
> 5
I've never heard anyone (not paid to do so) say anything good about the remake. I haven't watched it; but I'm a repeat viewer of the original.
I've never heard anyone (not paid to do so) say anything good about the remake. I haven't watched it; but I'm a repeat viewer of the original.
8Meredy
5, 6: I don't see how the 1973 version with Edward Woodward and Christopher Lee could possibly have been improved upon.
9Bookmarque
It couldn't have been. that movie is so good I wish I could forget it and watch it fresh every time. The gobsmacked sensation is just too awesome. I just saw what???? OMG. They completely had me.
10ed.pendragon
I rather liked the original staged production, though I understand it was savagely critiqued by Caius Iulius Caesar.