Best Historical Fiction

RuMuse: England, the 1520s. Henry VIII is on the throne, but lacks an heir, which creates ongoing crises. Told from POV of Thomas Cromwell.

elkiedee : I love this novel - but it's not historical fiction - it's a mostly contemporary novel with historical appeal. The main character is a 20th century police detective convalescing in bed and "investigating" the case of Richard III and the Princes in the Tower, but it's set in the author's present day.

elkiedee : I absolutely loved this when I read it but it was over 30 years ago now. I should reread, and would recommend to people who love historical fiction. I am thumbing it down because it's not a historical novel, it is a dual narrative story with a large part set in the past, but also a novel largely set in the author's present at the time of writing (late 1980s, published 1990).

sturlington : DNF

sturlington : DNF

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

sturlington : I'd call this fantasy.

RobPoulton : Arthurian fantasy

aulsmith : A mix of historical and contemporary fiction. I didn't like the contemporary parts.

: Libro facilón y no es novela histórica

smcwl : Not written as historical fiction.

elkiedee: I think historical fiction can be set in the relatively recent past. 10 years after the war writers in countries on all sides might well have had a very different perspective on those events. I would have no problem regarding a novel written this year but about the Iraq war that started in 2003 and ending before this, as historical fiction. Or a book set in Britain under the last Labour government, or the US just after Obama was elected or reelected, as historical fiction. I think it might be a bit soon to consider a pandemic novel historical fiction, but maybe within 5 years it will be part of our history.

Matteocalosi : Partly autobiographical and written only 10 years after the end of the war, not historical fiction

leslie.98 : Not historical fiction

sturlington : I wouldn't consider this historical fiction.

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

elkiedee: It was written several decades after it was set, perhaps more than 50 years later, and while it was somewhat autobiographical it was also fictionalised and presented as a novel. Although it's loosely based on the author's life and that of her family, lots of details have been changed, added, left out and this is historical fiction.

sturlington : Took place during the author's lifetime and is partly based on his experiences.

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

aulsmith : This is a mix of historical and contemporary fiction. I would have preferred it to be one or the other.

aulsmith : More legendary than historical