Dare Wright (1914–2001)
Autor de The Lonely Doll
Sobre El Autor
Créditos de la imagen: Dare Wright
Series
Obras de Dare Wright
Etiquetado
Conocimiento común
- Nombre canónico
- Wright, Dare
- Fecha de nacimiento
- 1914-12-03
- Fecha de fallecimiento
- 2001-01-25
- Lugar de sepultura
- Central Park, New York, New York, USA (ashes scattered)
- Género
- female
- Nacionalidad
- Canada
- Lugar de nacimiento
- Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
- Lugar de fallecimiento
- New York, New York, USA
- Ocupaciones
- children's book author
photographer
actor
model
Miembros
Reseñas
Listas
También Puede Gustarte
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 25
- Miembros
- 855
- Popularidad
- #29,932
- Valoración
- 4.1
- Reseñas
- 24
- ISBNs
- 68
- Idiomas
- 1
- Favorito
- 3
The story was not enough to provoke me into purchasing The Lonely Doll, but over the last couple of years, the book has come up on various list sites (Top Ten Sewer Disasters, Five Reasons Why You Personally Are Worse Than Hitler, etc.) when the topic of terrifying things from childhood make their rounds. I’m unsure how all my years in the book arena, from childhood to a year ago, passed without me seeing this book but I suspect it’s the case that I tune out that which is not relevant to my interests. I very quickly passed from picture books with minimal text to books marketed to teens and adults, and when I was still reading books for little kids, I liked drawings more than photos. I also tended toward smaller books, like the Little Golden Books. So the uneasiness this book caused some readers and still causes adults who investigate the book wasn’t something I experienced either as a child or in retrospect as an adult who read this book as a child.
The awkwardness in the final sentence in the above paragraph is intentional because it’s important to narrow down who is upset by this book and why. From what I have seen, children don’t really respond poorly to this book, or at least the children who were the target market for this book during its heyday, and that audience is mostly women who now are between 40 and 70 years old, though younger readers of the book pop up from time to time. I walked an uneasy line when looking into this book because I genuinely don’t want to know much about books, even fluffy picture books, before I look into them for myself but one statement came up so often that it was unavoidable, words to the effect of:
“I didn’t realize how creepy this book was until I found my old copy in a box in the attic and thumbed through it for the first time in decades.”
Though I was terribly interested in what sparked such a retrospective reaction, I managed to stop reading before these (mostly) women explained themselves. I’m glad I did because I was able to see the book through mostly uninfluenced eyes and, in the end, my reaction as an adult who did not read this book as a child is similar to the women who did. When I went back to review their reactions, there one one large commonality that I will discuss in a moment, but mostly we all felt a strange uneasiness that is hard to pin down. And though I feel I must emphasize that this is a book that is despised by the woke among us, the fact is that this is not a wicked or deliberately unpleasant book. It’s a relic of its time and possibly a very useful tool in armchair psychoanalyzing the author, a favorite pastime of mine. Unless one was a child who was very frightened of dolls in general, this book is unlikely to be that upsetting. More modern children may have a negative reaction because of changing mores regarding appropriate discipline for children but much can be said for any book about children written before the 1970s.
Though this is a very well-conceived, well-executed book, it’s an emotionally taxing book for an adult to read.
This is a part of a heinously long look at this book. If you are interested in reading the whole thing, have a look on Odd Things Considered: https://www.oddthingsconsidered.com/oddtober-2020-the-lonely-doll-by-dare-wright...… (más)