Marcello Simonetta

Il libro si pone come biografia storica, ma meglio sarebbe definirlo romanzo storico d'intrattenimento. L'uso e l'abuso del discorso diretto da una parte e l'assordante tacere circa importanti vicende storiche accadute dall'altra vietano recisamente di catalogare l'opera come biografia storica. Giudizi recisi degli autori su personaggi storici, inoltre, lasciano il tempo che trovano, tanto più perchè emessi senza giustificazione alcuna. Nessun accenno invece sulla fonte dei soldi che Luciano impiegò generosamente per il mantenimento del suo elevato tenore di vita. Per finire, sono riscontrabili innumerevoli imprecisioni e sciatterie ed interi periodi letteralmente incomprensibili, sia in relazione al contesto, sia se presi isolatamente.… (más)

This is a short, readable account of the so-called Pazzi conspiracy to kill Lorenzo de Medici and his brother, and to change the balance of power in the Italian peninsula.

The author, Marcello Simonetta, argues that the Duke of Urbino, Federico Montefeltro, was more heavily involved in the plot than previously thought. Simonetta bases his argument on a Montefeltro letter he found and then decoded.

Because the Duke of Urbino has long been suspected of being a part of the conspiracy, Mr. Simonetta's discovery, and therefore his book, is certainly not groundbreaking; but his book is an open window into the shifting, and often delicate, power struggle between the Italian states (and the pope), and into the personalities of the men who shaped Renaissance history: Lorenzo de Medici and Federico Montefeltro.

To bring these characters to life, the author republishes some of their letters; so we see first-hand their dilemmas and motivations.

The book also serves as a reminder that on one side of the Italian Renaissance is great art, great human achievement, but on the other side, are dark plots, conspiracies, power struggles and vendettas; so in a sense, the book offers a view of mankind as being divided between black and white.

Or maybe the book's perspective is that often there is no division between black and white, and that instead, much of the human experience is colored gray.

(As I read this book I couldn't help but see the origins of Machiavelli's political philosophy.)

It's quite remarkable, IMHO, that Lorenzo, through it all, retained many of his Renaissance ideals, so to me he is a symbol of a man having to overcome external obstacles and yet remain true to himself.

Or is he? The author briefly mentions that Lorenzo became a more repressive politician, but Mr. Simonetta doesn't explore how the assassination may have changed him.

(The most interesting history, I believe, is where we see how events change characters for better or worse.)

Also, I find this book lacking in that it tells only part of the Pazzi conspiracy: the roles and motivations of the Pazzis are hardly mentioned. Finally, Mr. Simonetta doesn't offer a unique or deep theory on the causes and forces of history, but then again, most historical authors don't.

Overall, this is an entertaining, well-written book that shines a somewhat narrow light on the history of Fifteenth century Italy.… (más)