Arthur Phillips (1) (1969–)
Autor de El Egiptólogo
Para otros autores llamados Arthur Phillips, ver la página de desambiguación.
Sobre El Autor
Arthur Phillips was born in Minneapolis and educated at Harvard. He has been a child actor, a jazz musician, a speechwriter, a failed entrepreneur and a five-time Jeopardy champion. He lived in Budapest from 1990 to 1992 and now lives in Paris with his wife and son. (Publisher Fact Sheets)
Créditos de la imagen: (C) Andreas Von Lintel
Obras de Arthur Phillips
Obras relacionadas
Etiquetado
Conocimiento común
- Nombre canónico
- Phillips, Arthur
- Nombre legal
- Phillips, Arthur Monroe
- Fecha de nacimiento
- 1969-04-23
- Género
- male
- Nacionalidad
- USA
- Lugar de nacimiento
- Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Lugares de residencia
- New York, New York, USA
Paris, France
Budapest, Hungary - Educación
- Harvard University
Berklee School of Music
The Blake School, Minneapolis - Ocupaciones
- Author
- Relaciones
- Phillips, Michael (brother)
- Premios y honores
- Jeopardy Champion (five-time)
LA Times Book Prize for First Fiction (Prague) - Agente
- Marly Rusoff (The Rusoff Agency)
- Biografía breve
- Arthur Phillips was born in Minneapolis and educated at Harvard. He has been a child actor, a jazz musician, a speechwriter, a dismally failed entrepreneur, and a five-time Jeopardy! champion.
His first novel, Prague, was named a New York Times Notable Book, and receivedThe Los Angeles Times/Art Seidenbaum Award for best first novel. His second novel, The Egyptologist, was an international bestseller, and was on more than a dozen “Best of 2004” lists. Angelica, his third novel, made The Washington Post best fiction of 2007 and led that paper to call him "One of the best writers in America." The Song Is You was a New York Times Notable Book, on the Post's best of 2009 list, and inspired Kirkus to write, "Phillips still looks like the best American novelist to have emerged in the present decade."
His work has been published in twenty-seven languages, and is the source of three films currently in development.
His fifth book, The Tragedy of Arthur, will be published April 19, 2011.
He lives in New York with his wife and two sons.
Miembros
Reseñas
The Egyptologist: A Novel por Arthur Phillips
Did not finish it
No, it's not a proper review (I leave that up to the experts), but more of an extended observation, which can perhaps be best illustrated with an example of Arthur Phillips' prose, with our protagonist Julian listening to his Walkman in the Manhattan twilight:
It's eloquent stuff, yes, all this aching, the blunt and concise beauty of a phrase like "this quake of joy." And yes, there are small gems like these scattered throughout the novel. But see, it's that word "moodicidal" that's, well, moodicidal. All this rapture, then a tiny thud, as if our appealingly lovelorn but not completely sympathetic protagonist -- the sort of person who would craft a word like "moodicidal" as a form of emotional self-defense, if that makes any sense -- had insinuated himself into the narration. A private grief made more palatable, perhaps, pulled to the surface, manifested and masquerading as verbal artifice. Because after all, the emotional core of The Song Is You is loss (the death of a child, a divorce), its depths momentarily excavated, dragged up to the light, by the fortuitous turn of the iPod's click wheel.
The thing is -- and this is where my disappointment with the novel lies -- The Song Is You is not really about music itself. Music is the milieu, sure -- rehearsal rooms, bars, groupies, message boards, drummers storming off in a fit, the privations of a tour. That is, it's not about music's capacity to transport, though it's actually music's transcendent power that Phillips beautifully captures in the lovely story (about his father and Billie Holiday) that bookends the novel -- the prologue, in fact, was what convinced me to buy the book in the first place -- but the rest of the novel's events simply pale in comparison.
The novel's narrative of pursuit seems to undercut the sublime quality of the prologue. Its cleverness as a whole -- one might cite "moodicidal" again, at this juncture -- deflates. There's this tension throughout that Phillips balances nimbly: is it a story about stalker and stalked, hunter and quarry... or a raging, unrequited love, of sorts? Well, it's both, kind of -- though not in such predatory terms. Think of the novel's proceedings as a more benign, albeit uncomfortable, pursuit. It's part-Chungking Express (a very good thing), part-Amelie (a not so good thing); these cinematic comparisons are apt, as what fuels the narrative -– a series of missed connections, as it were, between Julian and a singer -– is similarly about physical intimacy deferred. As another American songwriter (Tom Waits) once said, "The obsession's in the chasin' and not the apprehendin' / The pursuit, you see, and never the arrest."
The novel doesn't quite fulfill the promise that the Oscar Hammerstein III song of the title refers to:
What drives the singer crazy -- and I will always have Frank Sinatra in my head when I think of the song -- isn't how his love-object is the physical embodiment of the music, but (again) his longing that must be kept hidden and silent, kept only to himself. Music does not work in the same way that it functions in Nick Hornby's High Fidelity, for instance, where the main character's musical obsessions and mix tapes are substitutes for his inability to communicate.
In contrast, Phillips' characters are studiously hyperarticulate, and music, in its general sense, is merely pushed to the background. Perhaps a movie version, paradoxically enough -- freed from the written word and forced to rely on the visual and aural -- will pare the events down to something closer to a musical essence.
… (más)
...and he had the sensation that he might never be so happy again as long as he lived. This quake of joy, inspiring and crippling, was longing, but longing for what? True love? A wife? Wealth? Music was not so specific as that. "Love" was in most of these potent songs, of course, but they — the music, the light, the season — implied more than this, because, treacherously, Julian was swelling only with longing for longing. He felt his nerves open and turn to the world like sunflowers on the beat, but this desire could not achieve release; his body strained forward, but independent of any goal, though he did not know it for many years to come, until he proved it.
Because years later, when he had captured all that — love, wife, home, success, child — still he longed, just the same, when he listened to those same songs, now on a portable CD player, easily repeated without the moodicidal interruption of rewinding (turning spindles wheezing as batteries failed). He felt it all again. He pressed Play and longed still.
It's eloquent stuff, yes, all this aching, the blunt and concise beauty of a phrase like "this quake of joy." And yes, there are small gems like these scattered throughout the novel. But see, it's that word "moodicidal" that's, well, moodicidal. All this rapture, then a tiny thud, as if our appealingly lovelorn but not completely sympathetic protagonist -- the sort of person who would craft a word like "moodicidal" as a form of emotional self-defense, if that makes any sense -- had insinuated himself into the narration. A private grief made more palatable, perhaps, pulled to the surface, manifested and masquerading as verbal artifice. Because after all, the emotional core of The Song Is You is loss (the death of a child, a divorce), its depths momentarily excavated, dragged up to the light, by the fortuitous turn of the iPod's click wheel.
The thing is -- and this is where my disappointment with the novel lies -- The Song Is You is not really about music itself. Music is the milieu, sure -- rehearsal rooms, bars, groupies, message boards, drummers storming off in a fit, the privations of a tour. That is, it's not about music's capacity to transport, though it's actually music's transcendent power that Phillips beautifully captures in the lovely story (about his father and Billie Holiday) that bookends the novel -- the prologue, in fact, was what convinced me to buy the book in the first place -- but the rest of the novel's events simply pale in comparison.
The novel's narrative of pursuit seems to undercut the sublime quality of the prologue. Its cleverness as a whole -- one might cite "moodicidal" again, at this juncture -- deflates. There's this tension throughout that Phillips balances nimbly: is it a story about stalker and stalked, hunter and quarry... or a raging, unrequited love, of sorts? Well, it's both, kind of -- though not in such predatory terms. Think of the novel's proceedings as a more benign, albeit uncomfortable, pursuit. It's part-Chungking Express (a very good thing), part-Amelie (a not so good thing); these cinematic comparisons are apt, as what fuels the narrative -– a series of missed connections, as it were, between Julian and a singer -– is similarly about physical intimacy deferred. As another American songwriter (Tom Waits) once said, "The obsession's in the chasin' and not the apprehendin' / The pursuit, you see, and never the arrest."
The novel doesn't quite fulfill the promise that the Oscar Hammerstein III song of the title refers to:
I alone have heard this lovely strain,
I alone have heard this glad refrain:
Must it be forever inside of me,
Why can't I let it go,
Why can't I let you know,
Why can't I let you know the song
My heart would sing?
What drives the singer crazy -- and I will always have Frank Sinatra in my head when I think of the song -- isn't how his love-object is the physical embodiment of the music, but (again) his longing that must be kept hidden and silent, kept only to himself. Music does not work in the same way that it functions in Nick Hornby's High Fidelity, for instance, where the main character's musical obsessions and mix tapes are substitutes for his inability to communicate.
In contrast, Phillips' characters are studiously hyperarticulate, and music, in its general sense, is merely pushed to the background. Perhaps a movie version, paradoxically enough -- freed from the written word and forced to rely on the visual and aural -- will pare the events down to something closer to a musical essence.
… (más)
This is a tongue-in-cheek entertainment, not an historical novel.
I thought that this would be a Nick Hornby-esque meditation on music and relationships by someone who actually likes music, but here we have only a perfunctory taste of what the music mentioned in this book actually sounds like. We are presented with a live recording of Billie Holiday singing "I Cover the Waterfront", and the narrator's father's obsession with the song and memories associated with it, to show us how music and love are entwined with obsession. Or something. None of it is very convincing, especially the fact that the narrator, Julian Donahue, and an up-and-coming rock singer, Cait O'Dwyer, have a very strange and compulsive relationship based on nothing more on some drawings Julian left for Cait on some bar coasters. The lyrics to Cait's songs are not very good, and Julian seems to listen to nothing else on his iPod, which leaves his love of music in question. Also, no spoilers, but our hero Julian also turns out to be a weird, selfish dick in the end. I don't recommend this one. Cheers.… (más)
Listas
Premios
También Puede Gustarte
Autores relacionados
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 6
- También por
- 1
- Miembros
- 5,011
- Popularidad
- #5,001
- Valoración
- 3.4
- Reseñas
- 258
- ISBNs
- 127
- Idiomas
- 16
- Favorito
- 8
