Glenda Leeming

What's not to like about prosopography? Conventionally this is defined as a description of an individual's appearance or life, but in general a Who's Who offers a collection of such descriptions. These days prosopographies cover not just real-life biographies (mostly of historical personages, in Ancient Rome, say, or Victorian England) but also cast lists of fictional characters from literary works.

In Who's Who in Jane Austen and the Brontës Dr Glenda Leeming lists all the characters found in the literary canons of Jane Austen and the Brontë sisters. Austen's characters come first, plucked from the pages of Jane's six novels (but not the juvenilia or unfinished writings like Lady Susan and Sanditon). They're followed by seven of the best-known Brontë books -- four by Charlotte, two by Anne and one by Emily (again, juvenilia is not included, nor Charlotte's Angrian pieces written in her twenties). A short section on animals mentioned (particularly in the Brontë siblings' writings) follows, and then a helpful list of characters book by book, noting the appropriate chapter when each first appears.

Phyllis Bentley's foreword mostly renders any comments I might have perfectly superfluous. "This is a really intelligent and useful little book," she declares, and praises Leeming's notes for "vividly" presenting characters and personalities: "a nice tinge of irony, a very neat use of the novelists' own words, a brevity decidedly marked by wit, make these notes pleasurable reading." (Sadly, Bentley herself died just three years after this appreciation was published.) That brevity marked by wit is evident in the descriptions of the main protagonists, never longer than the equivalent of a page but containing everything you need to know.

Leeming also includes individuals mentioned only in passing, one line descriptions often providing no more than each writer herself offered. Opening at random I read of Goton in Villette ("Flemish cook in Mme. Beck's school, with whom Lucy is a favourite") or Miss Prince in Emma ("a teacher at Miss Goddard's school").

These days online sites freely and profusely provide such lists of characters; forty years ago though this would have indeed been "a useful little book" for readers losing track of which individual was being referred to, or what relationship they had to another individual. Here it is also done with sly humour, capturing the piquant observations of the novelists.

(By all accounts John Sutherland's recent The Brontësaurus: An A-Z of Charlotte, Emily and Anne Brontë also treats the novels with wit,** but as this work omits Austen altogether I'll happily make do with Leeming for a while longer.)


** I assume Sutherland penned his own description of himself in the Guardian, where he is distinguished as "Lord Northcliffe Professor Emeritus of Modern English Literature at UCL ("emeritus" being Latin for "scrapheap" and "Northcliffe" journalistic shorthand for "you cannot be serious")." If so, then readers of The Brontësaurus (and indeed his other writings) must be in for a treat.

http://wp.me/s2oNj1-whoswho… (más)

It is quite remarkable that before the advent of the wordwide web, students had to rely of "maps with newspaper clippings" compiled by librarians, and monographs on authors to get information on plays, and reviews of those plays. Nowadays, much on that information is available directly from the Internet.

Wesker. The Playwright by Glenda Leeming is a monograph that describes and summarizes all plays by the British playwright Arnold Wesker. One chapter is devoted to non-dramatic work. The descriptions of each play are based on the readings, as well as extensive use of reviews published in the newspapers at the time. There are a few b/w photos to illustrate the plays.

Perhaps it is a bit unfair to award this book such a low rating. I bought and read it as a students for a course in British drama, and a reading of the first trilogy, consisting of The kitchen, Chicken soup with barley and Roots. Reading the book from cover to cover 25 years later, makes for a pretty boring task, especially because the book was probably never meant to be read from cover to cover. However, my rating reflects that type of reading. Possibly to scholars of Wesker or individual plays, the book may still be valuable.… (más)