Edward Hollis

This book is definitely interesting, but it is also uneven.

A major theme throughout several--but not all--chapters is the idea of "restoration." I think if Hollis had made this an overarching theme, and left out chapters that do not reflect it, he would have had a much stronger book.

Hollis' reflections on restoration focus on the question of how to restore something that has had many forms. Which one can be deemed "the right one"? Would it be the first one? Or the largest/most magnificent? Or should it be the original architects plan (which may never have been completed at all--or may not be known)? Or simply fixing up/preserving the final form? Of course there are no right answers, which he does discuss somewhat in the Notre Dame chapter, as Viollet-le-Duc was criticized strongly for his mid/late 19th century restoration of Notre Dame.

My favorite chapters: The Parthenon, The Basilica of San Marco, Ayasofya, Gloucester Cathedral, Notre Dame, The Hulme Crescents, The Berlin Wall. That's 6 out of 13. I found The Alhambra, Sans Souci, and The Venetian to be the weakest.… (más)

This book recounts the histories of 13 well known, in many cases iconic, buildings from across Europe, America and the Middle East. The buildings discussed are as diverse as the Parthenon, the Alhambra, the Vegas Strip, Gloucester Cathedral, Notre Dame, the Ayasofya (Hagia Sofia) and the Berlin and Wailing Walls among others.

The recurring theme of the opposition of Islam and Christianity throughout the ages is central to the evolution of the design, function and detailing of a number of the buildings discussed. It is this usurping of buildings by different religions (or groups) over time that has resulted in some of the most architecturally interesting buildings.

Hollis manages to weave together a series of vignettes on each building covering mythology, religion, politics and architectural history to create biographies of the buildings that are accessible and full of interesting details, not only regarding the buildings but also the men and women from history who played a role in their creation.

The only real issue I had with this book was the lack of images. Each chapter starts with one, half page, black and white image. Many of the architectural details are wonderfully described in expressive and vivid language, but these passages also cry out for an accompanying image to fully illustrate these features – particularly for readers who are not familiar with every building covered by the book. I also had a small quibble with inconsistant timelines within a couple of the biographies, which while still fun to read, made the connections between the vignettes harder to discern and made the overall history a bit harder to fully understand.… (más)