Imagen del autor

Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919)

Autor de Art Forms in Nature

108+ Obras 1,239 Miembros 19 Reseñas 3 Preferidas

Sobre El Autor

Créditos de la imagen: Haeckel (left) with his assistant in the Canaries; 1866

Obras de Ernst Haeckel

Art Forms in Nature (1904) 763 copias
The Riddle of the Universe (1899) 109 copias
Evolution in Modern Thought (2007) 16 copias
The history of creation (2010) 16 copias
Naturlig skapelsehistoria (1868) 8 copias
A visit to Ceylon (1995) 7 copias
Bildwelten Der Natur (2006) 2 copias
A Origem Do Homem (1989) 2 copias
Proteus (2008) 2 copias
Das System der Medusen (1986) 2 copias
Monism 2 copias
Un Viaje a la India — Autor — 1 copia
absolute Ernst Haeckel (2009) 1 copia

Obras relacionadas

Etiquetado

Conocimiento común

Nombre canónico
Haeckel, Ernst
Nombre legal
Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August
Fecha de nacimiento
1834-02-16
Fecha de fallecimiento
1919-08-09
Género
male
Nacionalidad
Prussia (birth)
Germany (after 1871)
Lugar de nacimiento
Potsdam, Kingdom of Prussia
Lugar de fallecimiento
Jena, Germany
Lugares de residencia
Jena, Germany
Educación
University of Berlin (Dr.med|1857)
University of Jena (habilitation 1861, Dr.phil 1865)
University of Würzburg
University of Vienna
Domgymnasium, Merseburg
Ocupaciones
professor
naturalist
philosopher
physician
artist
zoologist (mostrar todos 8)
anatomist
biologist
Organizaciones
University of Jena
Premios y honores
Darwin Medal (1900)
Linnean Medal (1894)
Darwin-Wallace Medal (1908)
American Philosophical Society (1885)
Biografía breve
Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel (German: [ˈhɛkəl]) was a German biologist, naturalist, philosopher, physician, professor, marine biologist, and artist who discovered, described and named thousands of new species, mapped a genealogical tree relating all life forms, and coined many terms in biology, including anthropogeny, ecology, phylum, phylogeny, stem cell, and Protista. Haeckel promoted and popularised Charles Darwin's work in Germany and developed the influential but no longer widely held recapitulation theory ("ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny") claiming that an individual organism's biological development, or ontogeny, parallels and summarises its species' evolutionary development, or phylogeny.

The published artwork of Haeckel includes over 100 detailed, multi-colour illustrations of animals and sea creatures (see: Kunstformen der Natur, "Art Forms of Nature"). As a philosopher, Ernst Haeckel wrote Die Welträtsel (1895–1899; in English: The Riddle of the Universe, 1901), the genesis for the term "world riddle" (Welträtsel); and Freedom in Science and Teaching to support teaching evolution.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Ha...] biography segment, 3/28/2018.

Miembros

Reseñas

Schön, aber nur das Titelbild ist in Farbe. Hervorragende Abbildungen, alle in schwarzweiß.
 
Denunciada
BesterikEz0815 | 13 reseñas más. | Jul 13, 2022 |
A. Maz. Ing. A. Stound. Ing. Do words fail me? I fail words. I wdn't rate this bk, it's invaluable - wch isn't to say w/o value. Haeckel is my new favorite artist. I 'discovered' him thanks to a documentary called "Proteus - A Nineteenth Century Vision" by David LeBrun. I loved the movie. If you check it out, make sure to also check out "The Making of PROTEUS" wch I, as a film & vaudeo maker, found particularly compelling. The amt of work that LeBrun was driven to in order to complete the movie is IMPRESSIVE.

& Haeckel's incredible energy, his drive for a thorough worldview, his meticulousness, is BEYOND IMPRESSIVE. This edition has introductory essays by Olaf Breidbach & Irendäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt. I liked them both. BUT, it was Eibl-Eibesfeldt's essay that really GRABBED ME. The background on research into our perceptual mechanism(s) & their relevance to Haeckel were fascinating, engrossing. Eibl-Eibesfeldt is obviously another man w/ a vision pursued w/ profound dedication.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt quotes Haeckel at length:

"Purely speculative metaphysics, which were further developed from theories of apriorism established by Kant and which found its most radical advocate in Hegel, ultimately led to the utter rejection of empiricism and claimed that all knowledge is in fact acquired through pure reason, independent of all experience. Kant's great mistake, which had such serious consequences for all of philosophy that followed, largely lies in the fact that his critical "Theory of Cognition" did not take into account physiological and phylogenetic principles which were only acquired sixty years after his death through Darwin's reform of the theory of evolution and through the discoveries of the physiology of the brain. He regarded the human soul with its inborn characteristics of reason as a ready-made being and did not inquire into its historical origins ... he did not consider that this soul could have developed phylogenetically from the most closely related mammals. However, the wonderful ability to make a priori judgements has arisen through the inheritance of cerebral structures, which the vertebrate ancestors of humans acquired slowly and in stages (through adaptation and synthetic association of a posteriori experiences and perceptions). Moreover, the firmly established perceptions of mathematics and physics, which Kant explained as synthetic a priori judgements, originated by means of the phyletic development of the faculty of judgement and may be traced back to continually recurring a posteriori experiences and conclusions based thereupon. The "necessity," which Kant ascribed to a particular characteristic of these a priori judgements were these phenomena and conditions fully known."

Genius, pure genius. Alas, Eibl-Eibesfeldt goes on to develop his wonderful essay w/ this: "Is it not possible that the aesthetic sensibilities of people who have grown up in what many would find ugly, artificial environments of the industrial fringes of modern metropolises, have also been altered as a result of such new environments? If this were so, would it not explain, at least in part, the acceptance of assemblages made from found objects and other ignoble materials?" Oh well.. weren't Haeckel's radiolarian ALSO "found materials"? & "ugly" & "ignoble"? These terms reek too much of "decadent art" for me! Still, Eibl-Eibesfeldt's essay is fantastic.

BUT THE ART!!!!! Haeckel's devotion is praiseworthy in the extreme by my standards. This man was not lazy. These drawings-turned-prints are DETAILED. DDDDDEEEEETTTTTAAAAAIIIIILLLLLEEEEEDDDDD!!!!! The centerpiece of plate 61, Phaeodaria, is an alchemist's latticework if I've ever seen one. a geodesic dome, an a priori grasping of biomorphic geometry. Or something. & plate 87? What's this perspective-receding Brion Gysin-like quasi-rectangle underneath it all?

I don't care whether this man has been somewhat discredited by modern science - he's made an impression on me that once again demonstrates that the greatest minds are interspersed throughout time & aren't the flavor-of-the-month. STUDY THIS BK! STUDY EVERYTHING BY HAECKEL!
… (más)
 
Denunciada
tENTATIVELY | 13 reseñas más. | Apr 3, 2022 |
Another of my pop up book shopping binge. There's no text, just three dimensional renderings of some of the images created by Ernst Haeckel, doctor, biologist and naturalist in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Stunning and beautifully constructed.
 
Denunciada
murderbydeath | Jan 20, 2022 |

Premios

También Puede Gustarte

Autores relacionados

Estadísticas

Obras
108
También por
2
Miembros
1,239
Popularidad
#20,720
Valoración
½ 4.4
Reseñas
19
ISBNs
108
Idiomas
5
Favorito
3

Tablas y Gráficos