John Copenhaver
Autor de Dodging and Burning: A Mystery
Series
Obras de John Copenhaver
Etiquetado
Conocimiento común
Todavía no hay datos sobre este autor en el Conocimiento Común. Puedes ayudar.
Miembros
Reseñas
Premios
Estadísticas
- Obras
- 4
- Miembros
- 90
- Popularidad
- #205,795
- Valoración
- 3.5
- Reseñas
- 3
- ISBNs
- 12
- Idiomas
- 1
There are 3 main things I really want to say about this book, the first bulletpoint being a general critique and the following two specific problems with the content.
*First and most simply: the plot of "The Savage Kind" ultimately becomes so thoroughly and utterly convoluted that you will either want a corkboard with red string to pin together all the ridiculous layers, or, like me, you'll just gape at the wild selections that Copenhaver decides to whip out and toss into this novel like a contrived-plot-point stew, wondering how on earth it all keeps getting messier. The thought of writing down all the ridiculousness that happens makes my head spin, but essentially every single characters gets woven together in the most outlandish ways, and Copenhaver tries to stuff EVERYTHING into the plot. By everything I mean that he tries to either include or offer a commentary on everything including but not limited to:
a convoluted adoption plot; cheating spouses; filicide; spies; communism; the FBI including J. Edgar Hoover at a Halloween party; unknown parentage; multiple murders in the same family in the space of a couple months; blackmail; the political landscape of 1950s America; poison (lots); a convenient hidden diary that Has All The Answers; a dead mother; teenage girls exploring their queer and racial identities; a traumatic backstory of a girl being locked in a cellar filled with cats that gave her permanent scars all over her body (that last one still is unclear to me).
Listen, I was sucked in by the first third of this book. The prologue alone is beautiful and had me so hooked I knew I was going to binge the book in a matter of days. The first bit is honestly wonderful, and I was convinced I was reading a new favorite book. But around page 120 things start to spiral and never get back on track. What starts as a dark academia-style murder mystery turns into a hodgepodge of disconnected ideas and unbelievable coincidences. Ultimately there is so little room left for suspension of disbelief.
*Second: there is an extremely disturbing scene where Philippa reflects on a rape she witnessed. This event has weighed on her for most of the book, believing the woman being raped was a beloved teacher and friend of hers. She then learns it was someone else, but then has a "realization" that is described as such:
"Suddenly, I understood. I didn't try to stop Halo because I didn't WANT to stop him. I wanted Miss Martins to be reaching out, to be groping for me, to need me. I wanted her to be wounded by him, to hate him, and to turn to me."
Personally, I found this not only to be highly offensive but also so SO concerning. Philippa is a young woman who is in the process of exploring and coming to terms with her queerness. Throughout the book, she and Judy are both learning what it means to be WLW, and what this means for them both as individuals as well as to each other. To have this ongoing exploration of being a queer woman so tightly woven to this traumatic scene where Phillipa wishes this continued sexual assault on another woman in order to drive her closer to her feels like a gross, manipulative, and voyeuristic portrayal of the WLW experience. It couples queerness with violence in a way that is absolutely heartbreaking to read.
*Third and final concerning point: the use of the n-word. I understand that this is historical fiction and during the era this book takes place (1940s Washington, DC) that word was more broadly used; however, when reading this I kept thinking of an article I read by Delta McKenzie where she writes, "Historical fiction can be accurate without using words that dredge up years of trauma and suffering. Historical Fiction can be accurate without the shock and drama that will come from an author supposedly pushing the boundaries of what is acceptable." McKenzie then addresses authors using these slurs and asks,"Is your historical accuracy worth my degradation?" (link to article: https://aninjusticemag.com/racism-and-the-use-of-the-n-word-in-historical-fictio...
It feels especially troublesome encountering this word when it's written in 2022 by a White author. The other part of this is that one of the characters discovers that she is half-Black (and is even referred to by a different slur) and this whole discovery is written, as best as I can tell, for shock value purposes only. It's saved until near the end of the book, revealed in a shady meeting, and used as a threat of blackmail.
Copenhaver then takes this a step further and writes several various chunks where he has this character contemplate on what this means for her, how she feels her identity has changed, etc. Again, it seems VERY uncomfortable and unnecessary to have a White author to write the experience of a teenager who is coming to terms with the Black half of her identity. Coupled with the shock value aspect, I truly don't believe it adds anything to the narrative, and it takes the space away from actual biracial authors writing with authentic experiences on the matter (here's an article from ElectricLit with 8 books exploring biracial identity https://electricliterature.com/8-books-that-explore-what-it-means-to-be-biracial... ).
All in all, just massively and completely disappointed in this book. There is no way I would recommend it to anyone else. "The Savage Kind" leaves a foul taste in its wake, and I wish it didn't exist.… (más)