Robin Cohen (1)

This is an excellent introduction to the theory of diasporas, a term which has expanded considerably in recent years from its original use in the Jewish Diaspora to describe all kinds of cultural and ethnic dispersions. Cohen starts by defining common features of diaspora, and several different types of diaspora:

* Victim diaspora, e.g. Jews, Africans, Armenians
* Labour diaspora, e.g. indentured Indians
* Imperial diaspora, e.g. British
* Trade diaspora, e.g. Lebanese, Chinese
* Deterritorialised diaspora, e.g. Caribbean peoples, Sindhis, Parsis

Cohen then analyses each type of diaspora in turn, starting with the original Jewish diaspora and showing, very interestingly, that it is not as simple a story as is often assumed. After the destruction of the Temple in 586BC, the key Jewish leaders were taken to Babylon in captivity, and Babylon after that became a codeword for exile and alienation for Jews and subsequently Africans. But Cohen points out that Babylon is where the embryonic Bible took shape, where the Talmud was written, where synagogues were formed. When some Jews began to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple, the main centres of Jewish thought and culture were still in the communities at Alexandria, Antioch, Damascus, Asia Minor and Babylon. When the second Temple was destroyed in AD70, “it was Babylon that remained as the nerve- and brain-centre for Jewish life and thought.”

Cohen’s point is not to minimise Jewish suffering – he describes a lot of the anti-Semitism that Jews had to endure over the centuries in Europe and elsewhere, culminating in the horrors of the Holocaust – but to show that Jewish history, like the history of any people, is complex, a result of mixture and sharing ideas with other cultures. The imagery of the Jewish diaspora was in part shaped by Christians keen to position Jewish exile as a punishment for their part in killing Christ. But the reality is more complex, not a simple tale of victimhood.

The rest of the book follows a similar pattern, as Cohen goes through examples of each type of diaspora, illustrating the characteristics listed above, and also emphasising the complexity that he established in the Jewish case. A common theme is the ambivalent relationship that many diasporic peoples have both to their host country and their homeland. The homeland is often remembered with fondness or longing, and the host country is often seen as intolerant or alienating; but also people may see opportunity in the new country and choose not to return to their homeland even when they are able to do so. The host country, after all, becomes home in a way, and exerts a lot of influence on people even as they retain allegiance to their older, ancestral home.

In the last few chapters, Cohen talks about diasporas in the context of globalisation. In a way, the more simple, nationalistic claims of diasporic groups are becoming increasingly anachronistic in a world where everybody is moving, where national boundaries are becoming less important than they once were. But using Cohen’s more complex analysis, in which diasporas are not isolated victim groups, but cultures formed as much by their contact with host countries as by their attachment to the homeland, it’s easy to see how diasporas fit into a “globalised” world. After all, people who move to another country in search of work rarely lose their attachment to their place of birth. Emigrants worldwide send billions of pounds back to support friends and family at home, and form their own networks in their countries of residence to maintain links with their culture. They also assimilate and absorb some ideas and practices from their hosts. Cohen’s book captured really well for me the fascinating ways in which human cultures are formed, both through historic and contemporary examples. We tend to think in simple, absolute categories of race, ethnicity and religion, but the reality that Cohen describes here is much more adaptive, collaborative, vibrant and, in the end, much more interesting.… (más)